Outrage as Estonian SS Veterans parade through Tallinn

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Axis Kast
Vympel's Bitch
Posts: 3893
Joined: 2003-03-02 10:45am
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Contact:

Post by Axis Kast »

Are you seriously asking me to substantiate that the SS wasn't the only combat organization in Estonia during the Second World War not under Soviet command, Plekhanov? :roll:
During WWII some 70,000 Estonians fought on the German side in regular units (excluding the irregular Omakaitse). From these 20,000 volunteered and 50,000 were drafted or mobilized. All in all over 20,000 fell. The Germans spoke about the common fight against the common enemy, but kept the country occupied. Germans, despite their frequent arrogance, acknowledged that the training level and combat performance of Estonian reservists were excellent. As most Estonian officers had been arrested or killed by Russians, the surviving ones themselves said that they were only third-grade. But in the German forces they held the ranks equal or above of Estonian Army and fought well.
This mentions nothing of the SS.

http://www.geocities.com/kumbayaaa/esto ... viets.html
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Post by Plekhanov »

I certainly am asking for evidence you might think details of anti-soviet Estonian forces is common knowledge, maybe it is, but I think you'll find a few unforgivably ignorant types on this board including myself who wouldn’t mind actually seeing your statements substantiated.

It’s true your source “mentions nothing of the SS” that might be because “it mentions” very little about anything, it doesn’t say that the forces listed weren’t SS for example.
Axis Kast
Vympel's Bitch
Posts: 3893
Joined: 2003-03-02 10:45am
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Contact:

Post by Axis Kast »

I seriously doubt that all 70,000 Estonians mobilized as part of the "regular army" establishment did their service as part of SS units.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Alyrium Denryle wrote:I think he is asking if THESE PARTICULAR S.S. Vets participated in the Holocaust.
Thank you for successfully decyphering my oh-so-confusing post.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

I can't believe it hasn't been raised yet that there is a legitimate difference between the Waffen SS and the SS. The Waffen SS were front-line soldiers, they had very little opportunities to participate in the Holocaust. To my knowledge, no Waffen SS units administered any camps. Some Waffen SS units did have a reputation for brutality on the front, however. Let those veterans march, if their hands are clean.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

I believe that was the point I was trying to make, although rather more eloquently put.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
pellaeons_scion
Jedi Knight
Posts: 601
Joined: 2002-09-25 10:07pm
Location: one shoebox among a whole host of shoeboxes

Post by pellaeons_scion »

I think I was trying to in my own peculiar way. In particular with the idea that the SS was one single entity but was broken up into many different organisations, one being the Deaths Head regiments (TotenkopfVerbande) who were responsible for guarding the infamous camps
If apathy could be converted to energy, Australia would have an Unlimited power source.
User avatar
pellaeons_scion
Jedi Knight
Posts: 601
Joined: 2002-09-25 10:07pm
Location: one shoebox among a whole host of shoeboxes

Post by pellaeons_scion »

was=wasnt
damn lack of edit button
If apathy could be converted to energy, Australia would have an Unlimited power source.
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Post by Plekhanov »

Axis Kast wrote:I seriously doubt that all 70,000 Estonians mobilized as part of the "regular army" establishment did their service as part of SS units.
You are probably right a little digging came up with a figure of around 15,000 for the eventual strength of the Estonian SS that’s a lot of troops for your source not to mention.

According to this source a link from Thinkmarble’s post it would seem that most Estonian war criminals belonged to “the Estonian Police”, the “Estonian Political Police” and "the self-defense forces” particularly the irregular "Omakaitse". There were concentration camps in Estonia but they weren’t guarded by the Estonian SS but by the Police (though some Police units were later merged with the SS).

According to this history at least the Estonian SS seems to have been mainly a front line unit though one, which took part in “Punitive raids” something it would seem most units in that part of the war did.
As for the creation of the Estonian national SS Unit, the initiative here belongs to H. Mдe, head of the "Estonian autonomy", who in his speech on August 26, 1942 called for the creation of the Estonian SS legion. In a few days K. Litzman, General Commissar of Estonia, publicized A. Hitler’s decree on the creation of the "Voluntary Estonian SS legion" belonging to the German SS troops, subordinate to SS Reichsfьhrer H.Himmler (РГВА. Ф 451, Оп.7 Д.123. Л.299).

However the formation of the Legion only started on February 8, 1943 and before that the German authorities and local collaborationists conducted the preparations. Meanwhile, a "Society of the Estonian SS Legion’s friends" was established to recruit and give primary training to the volunteers.

All arrangements, recruiting and supply were placed under the jurisdiction of a special created "General inspection of the SS Estonian legion" headed by Gruppenfьhrer J. Soodla. German occupational authorities suggested that the 15% base of the Legion should consist of manpower of the Estonian East Police battalions (Thomas N. Partisan Warfare 1941-1945. Osprey Publ. Ltd. London, 1983, p.19.)

According to the SS Statute, the Estonian SS legion was manned on a voluntary basis, and the volunteers had to meet the SS requirements for health and ideology. Enlisted personnel who already had their officer and petty officers ranks received the corresponding SS ranks after a probation period. The enlisted men were directed to the Debica training center (Poland), where after a 3-month training took an oath to the Nazi Germany. By March 31, 1943, the Legion had 37 officers, 175 noncoms and 62 privates of the "Ostland" special battalion.

The legionnaires trained at Debica formed 3 battalions, later merged into the first Estonian volunteer grenadier SS regiment. In March 1943 after the oath the 1st battalion of the regiment was sent to the front line near Kursk and incorporated into the 5th panzer-grenadier SS division "Viking" under the name of the Estonian volunteer battalion "Narva" (up to the summer 1944) (Панкратов И.А. Битые любимцы фюрера // Военно-исторический журнал. 2003. №4, с.34.)

Given that, following the Stalingrad defeat of fascists in the winter of 1942/1943, the inflow of volunteers to the Estonian SS legion drastically decreased, late March 1943 saw the mobilization of all the former Estonian officers, November 3-10, 1943 saw the mobilization of all those liable for military service born in 1925. As a result of the mobilization activities, by May 1943, the Estonian SS legion had been significantly reinforced, thus allowing to deploy a regiment to the 3rd Estonian volunteer brigade under the command of Standartenfьhrer F. Ausberger. Its formation completed by October 23, 1943, it first operated against partisans in the territory of the BSSR (Thomas N. Partisan Warfare 1941-1945. Osprey Publ. Ltd. London, 1983, p. 21-229), and was subsequently sent to the front, to the region of Nevel and Sebezh.

German command’s archive records of the period reveal that the 3rd Estonian volunteer SS brigade, along with other subunits of the German army, was conducting Heinrich and Fritz punitive operations to wipe out the Soviet partisans in the region of Polotsk-Nevel-Idriza-Sebezh in October-December 1943 (ЦГА Литовской ССР, ф. Р-1399, оп. 1, ед.х.61, личное дело №1950). According to the very same archive, police battalions 288, 286, 313 and other Estonian police battalions, which belonged to the Estonian SS brigade, also took part in the Fritz punitive expedition. They took part in the fight against partisans, shootings of civilians, looting, destruction of the whole villages in Belarus and mass deportation of civilians to Germany (Там же, ф.240, оп. 1 д.7, личное дело 52-55)1. Punitive raids of the 3rd Estonian SS brigade continued until late December 1943222 (ЦА ФСБ Ф.25 Оп. 1. Д. 152. Л.2582).

In early 1944, it was decided to strengthen the Estonian SS troops by incorporating the Wehrmacht battalions and most battle-worthy police units, which would have made it possible to set up a full-fledged division. Ultimately, the two regiments of the Estonian brigade (№№ 45 and 46 grenadier voluntary SS regiments) were joined by a third one (№47), formed on the basis of 658, 659 and 660 Estonian voluntary Wehrmacht battalions. On 24 January 1944, the newly-formed division was named the 20th Estonian voluntary SS division (since May 26, 1944, the 20th grenadier division of the SS troops is the Estonian № 1). In April, the Narva battalion, renamed 20th fusilier SS battalion, was incorporated into it. Additionally, the unit included an artillery regiment and a field engineer battalion, as well as an anti-aircraft company, an anti-tank company and a communications one. The aggregate strength of the division totaled 15 thousand soldiers and officers.

In August 1944, the 20th Estonian SS division was reinforced by the Estonians who previously fled from German mobilization to Finland and formed a separate 200th regiment in the Finish army (1.7 thousand men), which fought against the Soviet troops on the Mannerheim line. Following Finland’s withdrawal from the war against the USSR, the regiment was sent to Estonia and disbanded, its military personnel distributed among the units and sub-units of the division. Estonians also served in the 11th Nordland motorized SS division along with volunteers from the Scandinavian countries.

In September 1944, the 20th SS division took part in the fight against the Red Army units, including the Estonian rifle corps in the region of Rakvere, where it suffered heavy casualties. In September 1944, its remains were sent to the training camp in the German town of Neuhammer, where, in October 1944, the 20th Estonian SS division, consisting of three Estland grenadier SS regiments, was formed anew from the isolated units of the defeated brigade, members of the 13 Estonian police battalions and "Omakaitse" detachments. Until January 1945, units of the division took part in the fighting in the Eastern Prussia. On 13 January 1945, the whole of the division was sent to the front, to the region of the German town of Vittenberg, where, along with other fascist units, it was surrounded by the Red Army units. F. Augsberger, commander of the division, was killed in action, and it was headed by lieutenant colonel A. Rebane.

Fighting its way out, the division broke out from the encirclement and retreated to the territory of Czechoslovakia, where it stayed until the utter crushing defeat of the German fascist troops. On May 11, 1945, near the town of Melnik, not far away from Prague, the bulk of the military personnel was taken prisoner by the Red Army units (Ready J. Lee. The Forgotten Axis. Germany’s Partners and Foreign Volunteers in World War II. Jefferson, North Carolina and London, 1987. p. 491), though some of the Estonian soldiers and officers (including 3 thousand men from the training and reserve regiment of the division) retreated to the West and surrendered to the English-American troops.
You seem particularly concerned about the Estonian Jewish population according to the source I linked to earlier
Immediately after Germany occupied the Estonia's territory mass murders of civilians, especially Russians and Jews began. On October 25, 1941 W. Staheecker, SS-Brigadenfьhrer, reported to R. Heydrich, Head of the RMSO, as follows: "Owing to a comparatively small number of Jews in Estonia it seemed impossible to provoke pogroms... Many Jews of 4 500 ones, who had lived in Estonia in the beginning of the offensive in the East had ran away together with the receding units of the Red Army. About 2 000 of them remained. In Tallin alone about 1 000 Jews lived. Practically, all the male Jews over 16 years were arrested. All of them were executed by the self-defense units controlled by the "Einsatzgruppen 1A" (Мартинсон Э. Слуги свастики. Таллин, 1962., с.74.).

On September 26-29, 1941 the Estonian "self-defense forces" executed 440 detained Jews (474 - according to other data) Hilberg R. Tater, Opfer, Zuschauer. Die Vernichtung der Juden 1933-145. Frankfurt/Main. 1992. s. 115.. The Germans partially transferred the property of those executed to the "self-defense forces".
It would seem these atrocities took place before the formation of the Estonian SS


Something didn’t seem quite right about your posts in this thread Kast and I’ve just realised what it is you seem to have discovered morality.
Axis Kast wrote:
CaptainChewbacca wrote: If this was the first celebration, I'd agree with you, but this has happened 11 times in the last 13 years, it seems to me that these guys are the closest the Estonians have to military heroes in recent memory, and they celebrate them.
And it was wrong all eleven of those years. The SS men, moreover, are far from the only Estonian veterans.
In this post for example you describe something as “wrong” by which I assume you mean morally wrong.

And here:
Axis Kast wrote:The way it is being made to sound, Estonians had two choices: join the SS, or succumb to the Soviets. That's ridiculous. The SS was far from the only formation out of Estonia to combat the Red Army.
You seem to be saying that Estonians who chose to join the SS made a choice which was morally wrong. I’m confused though because in the past you’ve repeatedly stated your belief that Real Politick was all that mattered and in matters of statecraft and war morality simply doesn’t enter into the equation.

That being the case why shouldn’t Estonians have joined the SS if they thought that they could to more for their country in that unit than in any other? And why shouldn’t their country then honour the veterans for their service?
Axis Kast
Vympel's Bitch
Posts: 3893
Joined: 2003-03-02 10:45am
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Contact:

Post by Axis Kast »

You seem to be saying that Estonians who chose to join the SS made a choice which was morally wrong.
Depending on the circumstances of their enlistment, that could very well be the case. I was, however, referring to the Estonian state's decision to honor SS veterans in particular.
I’m confused though because in the past you’ve repeatedly stated your belief that Real Politick was all that mattered and in matters of statecraft and war morality simply doesn’t enter into the equation.
A decision to hold memorial ceremonies in one's own territory does not fall under the definition of foreign policy.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Vympel wrote:I can't believe it hasn't been raised yet that there is a legitimate difference between the Waffen SS and the SS. The Waffen SS were front-line soldiers, they had very little opportunities to participate in the Holocaust. To my knowledge, no Waffen SS units administered any camps. Some Waffen SS units did have a reputation for brutality on the front, however.
Much more then once the response to an SS unit being attacked near a village by partisans was to level the village and massacre its inhabitants. Murdering POW's when it was the most convenient option was also common.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Post by Plekhanov »

Axis Kast wrote:
You seem to be saying that Estonians who chose to join the SS made a choice which was morally wrong.
Depending on the circumstances of their enlistment, that could very well be the case. I was, however, referring to the Estonian state's decision to honor SS veterans in particular.
Were you really? Because you really didn’t make that concern clear, this post of yours:
Axis Kast wrote:The way it is being made to sound, Estonians had two choices: join the SS, or succumb to the Soviets. That's ridiculous. The SS was far from the only formation out of Estonia to combat the Red Army.
Which I quoted my previous post doesn’t seem to mention present day state memorials. Nor does this one:
Axis Kast wrote:
As I understand it, the Germans came in and said "Would you like to join the separate Estonian SS and fight the communists who want to conquer your country, or do you want to sit and do nothing?"
The Estonians had a regular Army, too. It certainly participated in the Second World War.

The SS was a special unit with a special mission. It wasn't "just another fighting force."
or this one:
Axis Kast wrote:Are you seriously asking me to substantiate that the SS wasn't the only combat organization in Estonia during the Second World War not under Soviet command, Plekhanov? :roll:
It seems to me that in these posts you were morally judging the decision to join the Estonian SS when there may well have had other alternatives available. There’s no mention of present day memorials you only seem concerned with the decision to sign up during the war when even I (moralising bore that I am) concede that moral concerns might well have come a poor second to the needs of my country (if I’d been an Estonian) yet this is amazingly the only situation I’ve ever heard you make a moral judgement about.
I’m confused though because in the past you’ve repeatedly stated your belief that Real Politick was all that mattered and in matters of statecraft and war morality simply doesn’t enter into the equation.
A decision to hold memorial ceremonies in one's own territory does not fall under the definition of foreign policy.
But the veterans initial decision to join the Estonian SS was made in a desperate situation where they were concerned for the survival of their country in many ways it was effectively a decision of foreign policy (and therefore in your world totally free from moral concerns) isn’t it a little unfair not mark their sacrifices because our present day prissy moral sensibilities are offended by what they found it necessary to do in impossible circumstances?

Just where exactly or even approximately in your world of Real Politick do people become morally culpable for their actions?
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Legitimate Vets

Post by Aaron »

I don't see a problem here. These people are legitimate veterans of WWII like any other. If they were members of the Waffen SS then chances are that they never engaged in any atrocities. It was the "special" groups of the SS that ran the death camps and hunted down Jews in captured territory that deserve our contempt. Not these men, they are legitimate veterans and deserve to celibrate their service as much as I do.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

Frank Hipper wrote:I can understand, but not sympathise with, their point of view. Joining the SS gave them an opportunity to fight the Soviets.
Of course the ignored the fact that Hitler had first sold them out under Molatov/Rippenthorp....
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Re: Legitimate Vets

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

Cpl Kendall wrote:I don't see a problem here. These people are legitimate veterans of WWII like any other. If they were members of the Waffen SS then chances are that they never engaged in any atrocities. It was the "special" groups of the SS that ran the death camps and hunted down Jews in captured territory that deserve our contempt. Not these men, they are legitimate veterans and deserve to celibrate their service as much as I do.
yes but estonian, and romanian Waffen SS were known for being more fanatic then their german counterparts....

kinda like french police were worse then Heinrich's own....
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Legitimate Vets

Post by Aaron »

The Yosemite Bear wrote: yes but estonian, and romanian Waffen SS were known for being more fanatic then their german counterparts....

kinda like french police were worse then Heinrich's own....
So did these guys actively oppress the Jews in Estonia or are they just being lumped in with the rest of the "special" SS units? Just because they were in the SS doesn't mean that they actually committed any atrocities. In fact I don't think any Waffen SS committed any atrocites against Jews, their job was to fight the enemies of Germany on the battlefield, just like the army, these guys just really believed in the Reich.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Post by Plekhanov »

Aside from the fact that the Soviet occupation killed more people in less time than the German one.
Baltic Times wrote: According to the report, during the first Soviet occupation from 1940 to 1941, Estonia lost about 48,000 people. The three years of German occupation resulted in the death of about 32,000 citizens of various nationalities, including 929 Jews and 243 Gypsies who were either killed in concentration camps or in battle. During the second Soviet occupation, which lasted from 1944 to 1994, Estonia lost nearly 121,000 people. In all, the country lost about 180,000 people, or nearly 18 percent of the population.
I think the fact that Estonia (like many of the small republics in that area) had a long and I suspect unpleasant history of domination by Imperial Russia which it escaped in 1918 made many Estonians likely to side with anybody who wasn’t Russian even if that meant the Nazis who had previously sold them out.

Thinking about having to choose between Hitler and Stalin kind of puts present day 3rd party guys (such as myself) complaints about the 2 party system into perspective, I bitch about having to choose between the “lesser of 2 evils” those evils being Labour and the Tories which rather pales in comparison to the choices facing Estonians during the war.
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by Lagmonster »

My grandfather, a German and a veteran, once told me that he'd dealt with more than a handful of people who immediately assumed that anyone who picked up a gun in WWII and wasn't on the allies' side is obviously a Jew-killing sociopath. I'm sure we can comprehend the problem with making assumptions like that.
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
Post Reply