Projections and Promises

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Projections and Promises

Post by Darth Wong »

An interesting article on Bush's campaign promises, from way back in January 2001 (read: before 9/11 "changed everything"):
CNN wrote:School vouchers: Bush says that low-income parents whose kids attend failing public schools should receive vouchers to transfer their children to private schools if they choose. But almost all Democrats oppose vouchers, as do many moderate Republicans who fear they'll drain money from the public schools.

The president-elect's bargaining power was weakened in November, when voters in California and Michigan rejected pro-voucher ballot initiatives.

Social Security: It was one of Bush's boldest campaign proposals; a fundamental restructuring of Social Security to allow workers to invest part of their payroll tax in the stock market.

With more and more Americans investing in mutual funds and 401(k)s, the idea of private investment accounts may grow more popular over time. But in a Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, the votes aren't there for it today. Only four Democrats supported the idea last year, and three of them have left the Senate.

Missile defense: Talking tough on national defense last year, Bush promised to quickly build and deploy a national missile defense program, and he said he wouldn't be stopped by the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty with Russia barring the deployment of such a system.

"It is important for us to change the ABM Treaty with Russia, either change it or withdraw from it in order to make sure we have an adequate and effective and reliable theater-based antiballistic missile system," Bush told NBC's Meet the Press.

But with the current missile defense system failing to hit the target in two of the three tests the Pentagon has run so far, it will be hard for Bush to win broad support for a crash deployment program.

Tax cuts: Few of Bush's campaign proposals were more controversial than his call for an across-the-board $1.3 trillion tax cut. But with the economy wavering and the federal budget surplus estimates soaring, he's got a good shot at winning approval of a substantial tax reduction this year.

The question will be, which taxes, and whose taxes, are cut? Bush wants an across-the-board cut in income tax rates, including a big cut in the top rate for the wealthiest taxpayers, from 39.6 percent down to 33 percent.

A frequent rallying cry of Bush's on the campaign stump was his belief that "The federal government in peacetime has no business taking more than 33 percent of anyone's paycheck."

But reducing the top rate by so much -- particularly after a decade in which families at the top have done well enough to trade in the Cadillac for the Mercedes -- is a deal-breaker for Democrats.

Bipartisanship: Beyond all of his policy promises, Bush centered his campaign on a sweeping pledge to reach beyond party lines and soothe the partisan hostilities in Washington.

Bush has a strong record of working effectively with Democrats in Texas, but almost everything that's happened since Election Day has been a reminder of how hard it will be to continue that success in Washington. Democrats are already complaining that Bush hasn't shown more bipartisanship in constructing his Cabinet or outlining his agenda.

A coalition of liberal advocacy groups are gearing up to oppose John Ashcroft as attorney general. Environmentalists are waving the red flag over Interior Secretary-nominee Gale Norton. And Linda Chavez's nomination as labor secretary collapsed after it was revealed she housed an illegal immigrant during the early 1990s.

On the other side, conservatives are warning Bush against too many compromises with Democrats.
Interesting; based on this count, he actually did try to fulfill 4 of 5 promises (leaving aside the wisdom or realism of those promises), although the last one basically evapourated into the wind the instant he took power. Of course, it should be noted that this is hardly a comprehensive list of his promises. Some of his other, more amusing promises, including:
  • "Pay down the national debt to the lowest level since the Great Depression as a percentage of the gross domestic product." *coughcough*
  • "Support a bipartisan Commission to Eliminate Pork-Barrel Spending." BWAHAHAHA!
  • "Require emission reductions by electric utilities for carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and other pollutants." This one's just plain hilarious, considering his record of collaboration with energy companies. Good case of making a promise you have no intention of keeping.
Anyway, food for thought. What's scarier? Bush breaking his promises or Bush trying to keep them?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Can we just vote him out on the grounds that he can't pronounce "nuclear" correctly? I don't really need any further justification. He may have tried to keep some promises, but he still let this War on Terrroooor! cloud his vision.
Post Reply