Nice little non-answer. Come back when you've got something resembling an argument.Zuul wrote:Yes. That is precisely why I said "the government is not bound by law" and not something else.Patrick Degan wrote: You're telling me that the government is not bound by law?
Never said that.That several very obvious attempts to "control stupid parts of peoples' lives" have not faced court challenge and have been shot down on the basis of that law? That the "rich elite" you refer to rules as a monolithic bloc?
What of them?Where did the New Deal come from if it's the case that the government has always been under the control of a rich elite enforcing their hegemony? What about the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, and Title IX?
Because he's popular. And wealthy enough to break into the system at a time when the zeitgeist allows for it. How many other presidential hopefuls in the last 50 years or so have been black or women that have got this far? If there's no elite that are prepared to enforce hegemony on everyone, they should've cropped up as soon as blacks got equal rights and political ambition(which they should've had anyway, had they not been systematically repressed by... well, who were they repressed by, since the elites don't exist and don't influence society?).And why is Barack Obama managing to make so much electoral headway despite the opposition of this supposedly controllling elite enforcing its hegemony?
A non-elite, non-bourgeois ideal situation. Or do you think other countries having bourgeois systems suddenly means that America is absent one?As compared to where?
Nor would it. The overwhelming white male constitution of all points of authority and success does that. Or are you claiming that is merely a thing of the past?Handwaving away the fact of progress in American society over the past 220 years does not prove your argument, or FerrariF1's.
Yeah, because it was a red herring.Cuuuuute —you just cherry-pick one part of that paragraph
That's because some elites are better than others, something I already outlined.and conveniently leave off the entire bit about how Social Security privatisation —a central part of the conservative agenda supported by Murdoch and pushed by the Stupid Chimp— got defeated handily despite the supposed control of the government by the elite you refer to.
Because it was sufficiently unpopular with enough of the elite.Then why did Social Security privatisation fail?
Because they were voted out. Do you think my argument precludes that? Do you think I'm arguing that the republican elite are infallible and sit in darkened rooms plotting conspiracies? If so, you have read the wrong thing into what I'm saying.Why did the GOP lose control of Congress in 2006?
Why were they for it in the first place?Why have the American people turned against the Iraq War?
Because he's popular and has a shitload of money.Why is Barack Obama, a first-time presidential candidate and junior senator, in position to actually get the nomination for the Democratic Party despite the media circus directed against him?
Who do you vote for if it's McCain Vs. Hillary
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Patrick Degan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 14847
- Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
- Location: Orleanian in exile
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)