Accurate: free from error or defect; consistent with a standard, rule, or model; precise; exact.
Valid: Logic. (of an argument) so constructed that if the premises are jointly asserted, the conclusion cannot be denied without contradiction.
Personally I leave room for doubt, I can dispute that a rule is absolutely true without declaring it absolutely false and there is no truth to it at all. The statment altered this is "more accurate."
Scientology is not guilty of a doctrine of Multiply at All Costs, as many major Judeo/Christian/Islamic oranizations do.
What error? I started out by saying it was a broad based categorization that was true despite evident contradictions. Its not "virtually" impossible to make a generalized social statement, you just have to avoid sweeping up too many variables.OK, now you're just being a pedantic twat. It's normal to make generalized statements about social groups without necessarily meaning "100%". In fact, it is virtually impossible to make any generalized social statement if that's the standard. You're just pretending otherwise because you refuse to admit error.