Ohio Voter Reg: Case dead? Summon the DOJ!

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Ohio Voter Reg: Case dead? Summon the DOJ!

Post by SirNitram »

You might remember me posting this. Link In it, we see the SCOTUS kill the case by refusing to overturn the lower court's ruling. In a sane world, it'd be over.

In a sane world, however, we'd not have the modern GOP.

Link
The White House has asked the Department of Justice to look into whether 200,000 new Ohio voters must reconfirm their registration information before Nov. 4, taking up an issue that Republicans and Democrats in the battleground state have been fighting over in court for weeks.

The voter names are in dispute because their registration information conflicts with other official data.

The action comes a week after the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a case brought by the Ohio Republican Party over the same issue. Republicans have argued that the mismatched information could signal fraudulent registrations, but Democrats have countered that eligible voters could be knocked off the rolls over discrepancies as minor as a transposed number in an address or birth date.

President Bush yesterday asked Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey to review concerns over the voters raised by House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio).

Boehner wrote to Bush yesterday, saying, "I strongly urge you to direct Attorney General Mukasey and the Department of Justice to act." Boehner said in his letter that if the voters remain on the rolls without added checks, "there is a significant risk if not a certainty, that unlawful votes will be cast and counted."

In a news release, Boehner said that a letter he had sent Monday to Mukasey on the matter did not receive a reply. Boehner has asked Mukasey to order Ohio's Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner to make it easier for county elections officials to access the state list of mismatched voters. Brunner has argued that would require reprogramming election computers and would create chaos in the days before the election.

White House press secretary Dana Perino characterized Bush's referral of the matter to Justice as a routine step that would be taken for any such request from a congressional leader.

Voting rights advocates, however, immediately raised concerns. "This is taking the politicization of this to a new level, and the last thing we need is for the elections officials and voters of Ohio to be put in a chaotic situation in the last days before the election," said Jon Greenbaum of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

The voters' registrations have been at the heart of a dispute between the Ohio Republican Party and Brunner.

Information for the new voters does not match state driver's license or Social Security records. Federal law demands that states have a computerized database to check the records, but leaves it to states to determine what constitutes a match and what to do with mismatches. Voters who have not resolved discrepancies by Nov. 4 could be forced to cast provisional ballots, which are counted only if their registration information can be cleared up.

Brunner this week directed local elections boards not to eliminate voters solely on a mismatch, and yesterday issued orders urging boards not to force voters to use provisional ballots over minor issues.

"The statewide voter database was never intended to be a litmus test for voter eligibility," said Jeff Ortega, a spokesman for Brunner. "Every Ohioan must provide ID to prove their identity before their vote is counted. Ohioans can be completely confident in our preparations for a successful November election."

Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) said he was "disappointed that the president chose to interject partisan politics into the election. My confidence in Secretary Brunner's work remains unchanged."

Intervention on election matters has been a troubling issue at the Department of Justice and figured in the controversy over the firing of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006.
Anything, apparently, to remove these dastardly proles from thinking they have the right to influence politics.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Ohio Voter Reg: Case dead? Summon the DOJ!

Post by The Romulan Republic »

How can this happen? I thought Supreme Court decisions were final. I hope the Republicans will be suprised to find that its rulings are more than just a tool to get into power.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
TimothyC
Of Sector 2814
Posts: 3793
Joined: 2005-03-23 05:31pm

Re: Ohio Voter Reg: Case dead? Summon the DOJ!

Post by TimothyC »

SirNitram wrote:You might remember me posting this. Link In it, we see the SCOTUS kill the case by refusing to overturn the lower court's ruling. In a sane world, it'd be over.
The SCOTUS ruling was that the State GOP didn't have the legal right to make the case, not that the case was otherwise flawed.
"I believe in the future. It is wonderful because it stands on what has been achieved." - Sergei Korolev
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Re: Ohio Voter Reg: Case dead? Summon the DOJ!

Post by SirNitram »

MariusRoi wrote:
SirNitram wrote:You might remember me posting this. Link In it, we see the SCOTUS kill the case by refusing to overturn the lower court's ruling. In a sane world, it'd be over.
The SCOTUS ruling was that the State GOP didn't have the legal right to make the case, not that the case was otherwise flawed.
Yes, they decreed no standing to the people putting it up, thus refusing to overturn the lower courts ruling. Do you feel special for nitpicking?
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Re: Ohio Voter Reg: Case dead? Summon the DOJ!

Post by CmdrWilkens »

SirNitram wrote:
MariusRoi wrote:
SirNitram wrote:You might remember me posting this. Link In it, we see the SCOTUS kill the case by refusing to overturn the lower court's ruling. In a sane world, it'd be over.
The SCOTUS ruling was that the State GOP didn't have the legal right to make the case, not that the case was otherwise flawed.
Yes, they decreed no standing to the people putting it up, thus refusing to overturn the lower courts ruling. Do you feel special for nitpicking?
It doesn't change the truth of the matter. The Supreme Court made NO ruling as to the validity of the case. The only ruling they made was that the state Republican Party had no standing to bring the lawsuit. Even if all 9 judges thought that the lower court ruled incorrectly (in terms of deciding against the state GOP) their decision actually invalidates all rulings by basically amking the entire case go away. Since the GOP never had standing to sue the lower court should not have ruled on the matter. Since precedent can only be taken from decisions made on valid cases the lower court's ruling now has no weight of precedent.

In other words its not a nitpick any mroe so than any other dint of legal manuevering is a nitpick. It may be small but the consequences are noticeably different. Had the Supreme Court refused to hear the case period then the lower court ruling would stand, instead by declaring the GOP without standing they essentially made the whole case go away after the fact. This leaves an opening for another gorup which DOES have standing, perhaps the DOJ would be such a group, to bring suit against the Secretary of State of Ohio.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
Post Reply