We have now corralled the poorest elements of society into the worst housing in the worst areas for the best part of 20 years - it is not surprising we have created an underclass. I appreciate there are other reasons for this as well, but it certainly hasn't helped.
And before Starglider gets his knickers in a twist, I have voted Labour twice (Ken Livingstone for Mayor both times) in my 23 years as a registered voter - and will certainly not be doing so in the next election. Who I do actually vote for is another question entirely, not one I have an answer to as yet.
Is there actually a point to this or are you simply regurgitating populist press rhetoric? Since when have politicians been anything other than careerist? And why should they not be - it is hardly seen as a fault in any other profession to have ambition.Big Orange wrote:One of the main problems is that the post-Thatcher politicians are too much like careerist on the gravy train than actual administrators with proper qualifications and experience in broader matters; ironically Thatcher was a chemist.
This whole "experience in broader matters" stuff - talk me through why it matters. Does being a chemist give you a unique insight into Law and Order? Employment? Housing?