US Space-Based ABM Sensor Network semi-Operational.

[MKSheppard]

Link

WASHINGTON — A pair of low Earth orbiting demonstration satellites built by Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems for the first time on March 16 detected and tracked a ballistic missile launch through all phases of flight, a Northrop Grumman official said March 22.

So-called birth-to-death tracking of a ballistic missile launch had never been done before from space and is the most significant achievement to date for the Space Tracking and Surveillance System (STSS) spacecraft, said Doug Young, Northrop Grumman’s vice president of missile defense and warning programs.

“It’s the Holy Grail for missile defense,” Young said during a media briefing here.

Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman built three STSS demonstration satellites for the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA). The first satellite, which had a classified mission, was launched in May 2009. After completing its test program, it was transferred Jan. 31 to the control of Air Force Space Command to continue supporting the service’s space situational awareness mission.

The two unclassified STSS satellites, which were used in the March 16 test, launched in September 2009 on a single United Launch Alliance Delta 2 rocket. During an extended on-orbit check-out and calibration phase that concluded in November, the satellites tracked multiple missile launches in the early boost and post-boost phases and demonstrated the ability to relay data from one satellite to the other.

During the test, an ARAV-B short-range target missile was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility at Kauai, Hawaii. An STSS satellite detected the heat signature of the launch with its acquisition sensor, and then its gimbaled tracking sensor locked on to the boosting missile, Young said. The tracking data was successfully relayed to the other satellite, which continued to observe the target as it coasted through space, re-entered the atmosphere and splashed down in the ocean, he said.

Future STSS tests this year will be more sophisticated, Young said. In the coming months, the MDA will attempt to cue the STSS satellites to a missile launch using data from the operational Defense Support Program missile warning satellites, rather than the acquisition sensors on board STSS, he said.

Another test this year will seek to determine if the STSS satellites can produce missile tracking data good enough to cue the launch of ship-based interceptors, a concept known as launch on remote.

Navy Aegis ships have many times demonstrated the ability to launch an interceptor missile once a target missile is detected by the ship’s own radar. The ships are also designed to fire interceptors based on cuing from forward-based sensors, which greatly increases the area that a ship can defend. But this capability has not yet been proven in a missile intercept test.The Navy and MDA plan to conduct the first Aegis launch-on-remote missile intercept test next month, for which a forward-based AN/TPY-2 X-band radar will cue the launch of a Standard Missile (SM)-3 interceptor before the target missile is detected by the ship’s radar, MDA budget documents show.

Similarly, the STSS demonstration satellites later this year will attempt to track a target missile and feed data to the Aegis system to generate a “fire control solution” for an early interceptor launch, Young said. However, an interceptor will not actually be launched in that test, he noted.

Meanwhile, the MDA is pursuing an operational constellation of missile tracking satellites dubbed the Precision Tracking Space System. The agency will rely on the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Md., to develop a prototype system to be launched in 2015. An industry team is expected to be chosen in 2014 to build between nine and 12 operational spacecraft planned to begin launching in 2018.

The MDA aims to spend $1.34 billion on the Precision Tracking Space System between 2012 and 2016, budget documents show.

[SirNitram]

Very, very shiny. Aegis proven kills and satellite aiming, what could top that? Besides a big finger flicking the missile away, naturally.

[someone_else]

Cool, but I wonder who would launch ballistic missiles that need interception nowadays. Any secondary use for this?

[TimothyC]

Very, very shiny. Aegis proven kills and satellite aiming, what could top that? Besides a big finger flicking the missile away, naturally.

A Global Hawk derivative firing a modified AMRAAM to shoot down an ICBM?

[Sea Skimmer]

Cool, but I wonder who would launch ballistic missiles that need interception nowadays.

More people then ever. Tactical ballistic missiles are one of the fastest growing weapons fields right now. As manned aircraft get ever more expensive more and more folks are going to turn to short-medium range missiles as a replacement, and even the US itself is trying to convert some of its long range missiles to be conventional.

Any secondary use for this?

The system is almost certainly capable of detecting and tracking other kinds of missiles, especially the launch boosters of cruise missiles, and even subsonic aircraft, if we want it to do so. This would all be a matter of software. The existing space based IIR based ABM early warning satellites, which have been around since the 1980s and detect launche flashes but don’t track the missiles or warheads in mid flight, could already do a fair bit more. In fact early on before they had good software to filter it out the system would flag the afterburners on jet fighters as being possible missile launches, and also the explosions of bombs on the ground from major air strikes.

Basically we are at the point now that given good enough software we can make optical systems behave a lot like radar does, in terms of detecting and tracking a range of targets over a wide range of space at the same time. The details are all different (active vs. passive ect…), but that’s the idea we are aiming for. Meanwhile we also working very hard to add more resolution to radar systems so that they can make actual images of targets you can look at with the naked eye and figure out what you are seeing and thus become more like optics. The results of both technology fields going together and being mounted on the same aircraft (F-35 with APQ-81 and DAS is the ultimate example right now) is going to be a real game changer, and that is not a term I like to use.

I would hardly call STSS even semi operational though, we need about 30 satellites to get effective global coverage and just 3 of them simply don’t offer a useful capability in combat. It’s fine for training and trials because we can schedule the tests for when the satellites are overhead. The enemy will not be so nice.

[SirNitram]

Very, very shiny. Aegis proven kills and satellite aiming, what could top that? Besides a big finger flicking the missile away, naturally.

A Global Hawk derivative firing a modified AMRAAM to shoot down an ICBM?

Efficient and effective, maybe. But not as fun as sat-assisted targetting. Or as shiny.