Saudi Arabia announces mass execution, including protesters

[Thanas]

BBC

Amnesty International has expressed alarm at reports that the authorities in Saudi Arabia are planning to execute dozens of people in a single day.

The newspaper Okaz said 55 people were awaiting execution for "terrorist crimes", while a now-deleted report by al-Riyadh said 52 would die soon.

They are thought to include Shia who took part in anti-government protests.

Amnesty said that given the spike in executions this year, it had no option but to take the reports very seriously.

The group believes at least 151 people have been put to death in Saudi Arabia so far this year - the highest recorded figure since 1995.

In 2014, the total number of executions carried out was reported to be 90.
'Unfair trials'

The Saudi newspaper reports said those facing execution in the coming days included "al-Qaeda terrorists" and people from the Awamiya area.

The alleged al-Qaeda militants were accused of attempting to overthrow the government and carry out attacks using small arms, explosives and surface-to-air missiles, Okaz reported.

The Awamiya residents were meanwhile convicted of sedition, attacks on security personnel and interference in neighbouring Bahrain, it said.

Awamiya is a town in the Qatif region of oil-rich Eastern Province.

Since 2011, it has been the centre of protests by Saudi Arabia's Shia minority, which has long complained of marginalisation at the hands of the Sunni monarchy.

Among those at imminent risk of execution were six Shia activists from Awamiya "who were clearly convicted in unfair trials", according to Amnesty.

"It is clear that the Saudi Arabian authorities are using the guise of counter-terrorism to settle political scores," said James Lynch, Amnesty's Middle East and North Africa deputy director.

"Three of those six activists were sentenced for 'crimes' committed while they were children and have said that they were tortured to confess."

The three juvenile offenders are Ali al-Nimr - whose case sparked a global outcry earlier this year - Abdullah al-Zaher and Hussein al-Marhoon.

On Tuesday, the mothers of five of the six activists wrote to King Salman, imploring him to grant clemency, after learning that their sons had been subjected to a "random" medical examination. They believed it was a sign of impending execution.

Four of the five have been kept in solitary confinement, in a wing housing death row inmates, since being moved to al-Hair prison in Riyadh in early October.

"These executions must not go ahead and Saudi Arabia must lift the veil of secrecy around its death penalty cases, as part of a fundamental overhaul of its criminal justice system," Mr Lynch warned.

Last month, the UK foreign secretary said he did not expect Ali al-Nimr - the nephew of a prominent Shia cleric also sentenced to death - to be executed.

Saudi Arabia argues that death sentences are carried out in line with Sharia and with the strictest fair trial standards and safeguards in place.

Uh huh, very fair trials indeed

[wautd]

Ah "terrorist crimes"... Like being an atheist.

A real shame only Sweden had so far the balls to put some sanctions on this terrorist regime. It's infinantly worse than the Apartheidsregime but I guess sitting on a lot of oil goes a long way

[Channel72]

Yeah... Shiite Al Qaeda terrorists... that's so believable.

The ironic thing about the Iraq invasion, is that it had yet another unintended consequence which most people don't really appreciate yet: it's really helped spread and empower Shia Islam, and therefore Iran, despite the fact that we're supposed to be propping up the Saudis here. The new Iraqi government is Shia, and more or less serving the interests of the Iranians. I think the Saudis are getting a bit scared - which is why they actually invaded Yemen. (I like how we didn't go to war over that, unlike when Saddam invaded Kuwait...)

Although we can't have any American politicians actually admit this, it would probably be better for everyone if the Iranians were the dominant force in the region, rather than the Saudis. I mean seriously, they're way less crazy. The new Iranian president is even an advocate of improved women's rights - and they'd be a great ally against Sunni extremism.

Sadly, we can't just slap the Saudis with sanctions, because you know, gas prices, etc. etc. Let's all pray to Elon Musk to save us from this political conundrum.

[cosmicalstorm]

I am half waiting for Saudi to come crashing down, mass executions might be the first part of that drama. I do wish fluffy bunnies and rainbows could be the Saudi destiny but they have boiled a witch brew of hate and anti meritocracy so I see anarchy or some kind of civil war as a plausible outcome.
Then we will be forced to develop alternative energy sources like: Russia, solar, shale and fusion

Ah "terrorist crimes"... Like being an atheist.

A real shame only Sweden had so far the balls to put some sanctions on this terrorist regime. It's infinantly worse than the Apartheidsregime but I guess sitting on a lot of oil goes a long way

Swedens ended up apologizing and sneaking our "feminist foreign policy" away tail between the legs after the

---

Saudis shot back.

[K. A. Pital]

I'm not even sure the US imports that much oil from the Saudis nowadays. Does it? The perverse relationship seems more of an arms-dealing one than driven purely by oil deals.

[Thanas]

Seems more like inertia at this point for the US and possibly concern for European Oil Supplies.