Just for Stas Bush: Ukrainians: Revoke famine denier's prize

[MKSheppard]

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20030329-70525054.htm

Ukrainians: Revoke famine denier's Pulitzer

Natalia A. Feduschak
THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published March 29, 2003

Ukrainian officials and Ukrainian-Americans have begun a campaign to revoke the Pulitzer Prize awarded to a New York Times writer who reported that a man-made famine that killed millions in the 1930s never happened.

"It has become a world action," said Tama Gallo, executive director of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, a New York-based group that began the effort to have the prestigious prize awarded to Walter Duranty in 1932 withdrawn.

Mr. Duranty, who was the Times' Moscow correspondent from 1921 to 1934, won the Pulitzer for a 1931 series of reports about Soviet dictator Josef Stalin's five-year plans to reform the economy.

His stories appeared in the Times before the Ukrainian famine of 1932-1933, which left 5 million to 10 million dead.

Western historians now generally agree that the famine was the result of Stalin's industrialization effort and an attempt to break the will of the independence-minded Ukrainian people.

To ensure cities were fed, the Soviet dictator set impossibly high grain quotas for Soviet Ukraine's collectivized farmers and removed every other source of food available to them.

Police were sent to the Ukrainian countryside to monitor compliance. Anyone found hiding grain was fatally shot, according to eyewitnesses.

Ukrainian-Americans have sporadically attempted to have Mr. Duranty's prize withdrawn.

With the 70-year anniversary of the famine being commemorated in an independent Ukraine, the movement has gained new momentum. In unprecedented hearings recently in parliament, demands were made that the prize be revoked.

The government in Kiev is expected to ask the United Nations to recognize the famine as an act of genocide against the Ukrainian people.

In his 1932-1933 dispatches, Mr. Duranty denied that a famine was occurring in Soviet Ukraine, although he has been quoted in several books as privately telling friends he had never seen such misery.

Sig Gissler, administrator for the Pulitzer Prizes, said he understands the concern regarding Mr. Duranty, who died in 1957, but past Pulitzer boards have not deemed it necessary to revoke his prize.

"I do think there is a tendency to merge the prize, which is from reporting in 1931, with events in 1932-33," he said.

Mr. Gissler said he could not speculate whether future boards would return to the question of withdrawing the prize.

The New York Times itself has criticized Mr. Duranty's reporting. In displays and materials devoted to its Pulitzer Prizes, the Times notes that writers at the paper and elsewhere have discredited his coverage.

Still, the Times has not asked that the prize be revoked.

"The Pulitzer Board has reviewed the Duranty prize several times over the years, and the board has never seen fit to revoke it," said Catherine Mathis, vice president of corporate communications for the New York Times Co. "In that situation, the Times has not seen merit in trying to undo history."

[Joe]

I don't see why this guy's reward should be revoked; if we were dealing with a reporter who deliberately lied like Duranty did and underplayed the Holocaust in order to advance his agenda his reward would have been taken away years ago. The Times has never even apologized for his lies.

[K. A. Pital]

I don't see anything factual: e.g. documents, statistics, administrative logs. WTF you post this article is for?
I don't deny famine, MKSheppard. So please, bother to read my posts. I said so many times that indirect consequences of Soviet policy could have resulted in many deaths. You chose to ignore it and (without giving any factual evidence) post an article about a reporter denying famine.
This has absolutely no connection with my words. Please, next time, if you wish to attack me, at least try to understand the position which you are attacking.

[The Duchess of Zeon]

I said so many times that indirect consequences of Soviet policy could have resulted in many deaths. You chose to ignore it and (without giving any factual evidence) post an article about a reporter denying famine.

If the Soviet government was aware the policy could cause deaths, they are culpable for them.

[K. A. Pital]

If the Soviet government was aware the policy could cause deaths, they are culpable for them.

Yes, I agreem they are. I don't defend the Soviet government, if you didn't get that from my post.

[NecronLord]

HoS

[Vympel]

HoS

Why?