https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-a ... ror-2019-7
To be honest, some of what Antifa, or certain members of it, have done could certainly be called terrorism. I don't condone that. But I think we all know Trump's motives here have nothing to do with concern for the law, and everything to do with branding his political opponents terrorists, and potentially giving him a pretext for mass arrests of Left-wing activists. Especially since as noted in the article, ANTIFA isn't really a single organization so much as a philosophy/loose affiliation, and there are a lot of people who identify with it, or have in the past, who have not committed violent acts. If we were going to be consistent about this, we would have to likewise label anyone who has identified themselves as a member of the Alt. Right a terrorist.President Donald Trump took aim at the radical left-wing movement Antifa on Twitter Saturday, writing that the organization was being considered for dedication as a terror organization.
Trump waved off the group as a collection of "gutless Radical Left Wack Jobs" who had enacted violence on "only non-fighters."
"Consideration is being given to declaring ANTIFA, the gutless Radical Left Wack Jobs who go around hitting (only non-fighters) people over the heads with baseball bats, a major Organization of Terror (along with MS-13 & others)," Trump wrote. "Would make it easier for police to do their job!"
—Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 27, 2019
Antifa, short for "anti-fascist," describes a loose, leaderless network of activists that seek to combat right-wing authoritarianism and white supremacy — sometimes through aggressive or even violent means. It has existed for decades but gained prominence after Trump's 2016 election and has been a popular target for right-wing commentators.
Trump's tweets came days after Republican Sens. Bill Cassidy and Ted Cruz introduced a resolution that would label Antifa members "domestic terrorists."
"Antifa are terrorists, violent masked bullies who 'fight fascism' with actual fascism, protected by Liberal privilege," Cassidy said in a statement. "Bullies get their way until someone says no. Elected officials must have courage, not cowardice, to prevent terror."
Read more: After conservative blogger Andy Ngo tweeted that he was 'attacked by antifa,' a GoFundMe for his recovery raised over $100,000
Conservative blogger Andy Ngo drummed up fresh criticism against the group late last month when he was assaulted by suspected Antifa members. He was ultimately one of eight people injured in clashes after dueling demonstrations between Antifa members and far-right organizations, including the Proud Boys, turned violent.
Ngo tweeted that he was "attacked by antifa," which was captured in a video taken by Oregonian reporter Jim Ryan, which has been viewed almost 8 million times on Twitter. In the video, Ngo is punched and has silly string, eggs, cups, and other unidentified liquids thrown at and sprayed on him.
Though many conservatives have condemned the group, some civil-liberties advocates have said that a formal terror label wouldn't be appropriate.
"It is dangerous and overly broad to use labels that are disconnected [from] actual individual conduct," Hina Shamsi, director of the national security project at the American Civil Liberties Union, told The Washington Post about a possible designation. "And as we've seen how 'terrorism' has been used already in this country, any such scheme raises significant due process, equal protection and First Amendment constitutional concerns."
Kat Tenbarge contributed reporting.
I don't necessarily expect that the bill will pass the House, but there's a trap there- if the Democratic House blocks it, then the Democratic Party can be collectively branded as supporters of Left-wing terrorism going into the election.
I also wonder about the international effects. For example, if there are people living in Canada who identify themselves as Antifa members, will the Trump Regime demand their extradition as terrorists? Or (getting into some of the more radical, worst case scenarios), could he use War on Terror precedent to target them via drone strikes or extraordinary rendition?