N.Korea admits to Nuclear Weapons

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Post by Crown »

This isn't too suprising. Fact is had the Clinton administration not got the nuke deal that it did with NK back in the day, today they would have 50-60 nukes (PBS documentary). So while NK admits that it has nukes now, it would only have a handful at best.

Not the best scenario, but puts things into perspective. Bush's administration never had a policy towards NK, they had an attitude. Well the roosters are coming home to roost y'all.

EDIT:: Just noticed the source, I would also like to see if I can find another source...
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
Justin
Redshirt
Posts: 34
Joined: 2003-04-07 11:00am
Location: Florida

Post by Justin »

Fact is, the Clinton administration caved in to pressure and bought the North Koreans (bribed) off. Bush finds that highly immoral (as do I). Fact is, it's much easier to let the dammed North Koreans starve themselves. And if you Canadiens and Australians find that so immoral why don't you guys pony up the money and buy Kim off this time? You want peace? Well do something about it. Fact is, the Koreans want money, so why don't your goverments give it to them? I got news you. Bush was isolationist before 9/11 and he would love nothing better than to go back to it. Fact is, we were leaving the Korean penninsula before this started, and if Kim wasn't a total idiot we would be well on our way out (which is what the crazy paranoid little fucker wanted in the first place, so he could roll over South Korea) and if that's so horrible why dosn't Canada, the EU, or Australia sign a mutual defence pact with South Korea, or even better, send a couple of divisions worth of troops over there to guard the DMZ?
Can anybody answer this question?
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

lukexcom wrote:
Same thing here. It looks good, although there are a few copy-paste jobs from FAS, from what I can tell by scanning.
The thing that annoys me about both FAS and globalsecurity.org is the difference in quality between US systems and such and the other countries. It's Soviet systems coverage is especially poor, all except for the naval section, which is good because it has ship lists and numbers.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Ted
BANNED
Posts: 3522
Joined: 2002-09-04 12:42pm

Post by Ted »

Justin wrote:Can anybody answer this question?
Maybe it is because your government CAUSED the whole problem as it is now?

You government by placing that idiot MacArthur in control, who got the Chinese involved.
Justin
Redshirt
Posts: 34
Joined: 2003-04-07 11:00am
Location: Florida

Post by Justin »

And how exactly did he he get the Chinese involved? The Korean war was a U.N. war, although, as usual, the U.S. contributed the most blood (dead Americans) and treasure (low intrest loans and lucrative trade deals afterward to get South Koreans economy back afloat). And if you want to take over, and think you can do a better job, that's fine by us. Good Luck. Are you going to write to your head of state or local goverment represenitive and urge them to take over in Korea? And would they do it if you did?:roll: If not, I suggest that you Butt Out. :D
Justin
Redshirt
Posts: 34
Joined: 2003-04-07 11:00am
Location: Florida

Post by Justin »

And I noticed although you were ready to whine about the situation, you did not mention any kind of solution.

" The problem of leadership is inevitably:Who will play God?"
User avatar
acesand8s
Padawan Learner
Posts: 307
Joined: 2003-04-14 11:48pm
Location: Rhode Island

Post by acesand8s »

And how exactly did he he get the Chinese involved?
MacArthur smashed the North Korean Army with the Inchon landings, then invaded the north. The Chinese feared, correctly, that the US would unite the Koreas under a democracy and sent a few hundred thousand troops to defend N. Korea. Or was that a retorical question?
Maybe it is because your government CAUSED the whole problem as it is now?

You government by placing that idiot MacArthur in control, who got the Chinese involved.
Yeah, but without MacArthur and the Inchon landing, NK probably would have beaten the last pocket of South Korean/UN resistance and we would have a united Korea...communist of course. That doesn't help the situation much.
The_Nice_Guy
Jedi Knight
Posts: 566
Joined: 2002-12-16 02:09pm
Location: Tinny Red Dot

Post by The_Nice_Guy »

I always thought the Yalu river line was a poor excuse for the Chinese. And the end result was the death of an entire generation of chinese men in Korea.

[sarcasm]Great going, Mao![/sarcasm]

The Nice Guy
The Laughing Man
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Justin wrote:And if you Canadiens


Fuck off Motherfucker. There hasn't been one Canadian to post here before me.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

phongn wrote:
Aren't there some rumors that Moscow may be getting hit-to-kill warheads?
Such rumors can be found in my 1980 copy of Soviet Military power, it doesnt seem to have ever happened.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Ignorant twit
with no dick
Posts: 148
Joined: 2003-03-27 09:31pm

Post by Ignorant twit »

Maybe it is because your government CAUSED the whole problem as it is now?
Snort, only if you count our calculation not to take the war to mainland China as a cause. Who knows maybe if we let McArthur bomb the Chinese we could have kicked the "volunteer's" ass and had a united democratic Korea.

Honestly North Korea invaded, we kicked their asses out. What were supposed to do ... stop at the original border? Yeah we tried that too, it was called Vietnam. Notice how well THAT strategy worked.

The simple fact of the matter is China was BS'ing about the Yula and any claims of defense. Notice how their offensive did not stop at defending the Yula, nor even at holding the 38th parrallel. China had a few million former KMT soldiers and surprise, surprise ... 2/3rds of em elected not to be repatriated. China wanted a communist Korea, if they could only get the 38th parrallel ... then that is what they'd take. If they could burn KMT lives to get more ... why not?
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

The_Nice_Guy wrote:I always thought the Yalu river line was a poor excuse for the Chinese. And the end result was the death of an entire generation of chinese men in Korea.

[sarcasm]Great going, Mao![/sarcasm]

The Nice Guy
Communist states cant tolerate an alternative to there system existing. While in the west the Russian was checked by US nuclear strength, in the east the Chinese thought they could just sweep the US out of a country it didn't care that much about and then return to building there own state.

However like so many nations, they underestimated the US resolve and strength
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Post Reply