Thanas wrote:As for punishing states who elect fascists, I think it leads down a very dark path where bureaucrats from Brussels decide what is accpetable and what not and which deals democracy a fatal blow by outlawing opinions and debate. If someone claims that for example Poland is the greatest nation on earth and that it deservers special consideration, is he a nationalist, fascist or a politician who tries to get the most for his country? The borders are fleeting.
Oh come on. If people from Brussels can't see Nazi symbols right under their nose, yeah, they're probably unqualified to be the judging bureaucrats, I agree. Fatal blow to democracy - is the failure of this parliamentary democracy to provide people with any semblance of a decent life, their states are being run by thugs, liars and security fanatics, but instead leading nations into financial ruin, collapse, civil strife and finally another strongman coming out on top of things. EU transfusions may help to slow this process, but I highly doubt they'll reverse it.
Thanas wrote:But you cannot just start punishing people because they disagree with you.
Europe and America almost destroyed the economy of Tehran because they thought they wanted to have nuclear weapons, a right that a sovereign state has and will always have.
Mange wrote:Also, just because a majority of the population is Russian, doesn't mean that everyone is pro-Russia either (ethnic Russians were part of the Maidan as well, some of which had travelled from the Crimea).
Ethnic Russians who stood side by side with the very fascists and nazis that on their web forums say Russians are the eternal enemy and should be forcibly ukrainized are most likely useful idiots, often they're recruited from football fan groups that are infused with right-wing fascist movements.
Mange wrote:However, it's still part of Ukraine.
Decisions of a government that you say is not democratic cannot be considered authoritarive.
Mange wrote:I can understand why the Crimean Tatars, who formed the majority population on the peninsula before the Russian annexation in 1783 and still was a sizeable minority before the peninsula was ethnically cleansed in 1944, are deadset against any integration with Russia
You want to allow 10% of the population to dictate its will to the others? I like democracy, but this is not it. This is ethnocracy and ethnic dictatorship.
Mange wrote:...the only quotes I've seen from for example Interfax are to the effect that those guilty of seizing the parliament building must be punished (and I think that's different from the meaning of your quotes).
Yatsenuk and UDAR said that they will not tolerate any separatism. Turchinov said that SBU should solve the separatist problem and arrest those who instigate separation, so there's no question about what will happen to people who demonstrate against Crimea's Ukrainian fate. So if it comes to a standoff, who is going to help?
Mange wrote:It's an extremely provocative gesture and if you're questioning the parliament in Kiev, then you must question just how free the MPs in the Crimean parliament are to act and vote when the building is under control of armed men who shows their loyalty to another country. And no countries should interfere militarily.
If the "armed men" are loyal to another country, why their only demand is a referendum on Crimean status? Why not demand the deputees to sign a declaration of independence at gunpoint? And I know that the Parliament in Crimea is at gunpoint. Just like the Rada. Any revolution is worth anything only when it can defend itself. Right now it's uprising versus uprising. We'll see what happens next.
Mange wrote:I can not have an opinion on this, but I'd say that any referendum should be made with the consensus of both the national and regional parliament.
Regional parliament can give it's agreement, the national is not necessary. For the national parliament will never sanction separatism, even if this is the will of the region.
Mange wrote:I am also of the firm opinion that the rights of all minorities must be safeguarded.
I have not heard that Tatars in Kazan, Russia, suffered recently. So even in the worst case (Crimea goes to Russia, not becomes independent) I don't think minorities will suffer. Also, Russians are a minority in the Ukraine, their rights currently are being trampled. Should Europe do anything?