What do you mean 'dominos', Orange?
Portugal, Spain, and Italy are democracies; there are viable channels for the public to compel the government to stop doing something it dislikes without having to go to such lengths. The problems they face are different, and the fact that they aren't putting up with thirty-year dictators will change the reaction. I don't think this kind of thing
can cross the Med; the phenomenon has a lot to do with the fact that the north and south shores of the Med are different.
Phantasee wrote:I attended a lecture by Jonas Haertle from the UN about the Global Compact and the PRiME program (our school signed on). He mentioned that democracy is not necessarily the expected outcome of these revolutions. Democracy needs institutions and nurturing. Basically, as long as people's needs and demands are met, the form of government doesn't matter as much. He pointed to China as an example of an autocratic regime that is improving the standard of living and quality of life for its people without being a democracy. So while it is possible for a democratic form of government to be an outcome, we should not necessarily expect it over any other form. At the end of the day, if the people of Egypt are satisfied that their needs have been met, they will be satisfied with whatever form of government is in power.
What matters, I think, is that the government actually keeps it in their heads that they need to
do something to maintain the well-being of the people. That civilization isn't something that "just happens," and that they can't keep it happening by sitting on top and skimming off a few percent to hand to their cronies.
The Chinese autocrats understand this; the old Soviets did too, though the modern Russian oligarchic-pseudodemocracy generally doesn't. Around the world, some dictators get it, others don't. Nearly all democratic governments do... but democracy isn't a prerequisite for that.
The danger is, as Stas points out, that if Mubarak is allowed to get off the hook this way, step down from power peaceably and transfer it to another person who is, basically, King Mubarak II... it defeats the purpose of the demonstrations, and yet may appease said demonstrators enough that they give the new guy a five or ten-year honeymoon to run Egypt into the ground before doing anything about it.