Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Bilbo
Jedi Master
Posts: 1064
Joined: 2008-10-26 11:13am

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Bilbo »

Kanastrous wrote:
Bilbo wrote:
The "Mexican Nationals" in question are all scumballs he caught illegally crossing our border and trespassing on his land. That makes them scum. So yes every time a Mexican National crosses our border illegally his name becomes synonymous with illegal alien scum.
You know, I really, really despise illegal migration into the US, as well as the deleterious effects it has on our medical care, public welfare, education and law-enforcement systems, not to mention the wage-depressing effect on our labor market.

But I can't see despising or hating the individuals who are trying to get in. They're mainly poor people who have been elaborately fucked over by their own rulership for about 200 years, and who are trying to find a low-paying job so as to send some extra money home to where there are nothing but barely-paying jobs, if that.

I don't propose relaxing or ceasing enforcement of the law, but at the same time I think that sentiments like 'illegal alien scum' are counter-productive and really kind of unfair.

Do some digging. Look at how much of the illegal drug trade is carried across the border by these poor souls just looking for jobs. Then also look up some crime figures and see how much crime in this country is by the very same poor souls looking for work.
I KILL YOU!!!
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Stark »

So, how many illegals per week would need to cross the border just to support Beverly Hills party favours? Are each of them moving a key by themselves? :)
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Kanastrous »

Bilbo wrote:Do some digging. Look at how much of the illegal drug trade is carried across the border by these poor souls just looking for jobs. Then also look up some crime figures and see how much crime in this country is by the very same poor souls looking for work.
I think we're probably in agreement regarding the need for proper border security and law enforcement.

It's the layer of vitriol on top that strikes me as unnecessary.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Surlethe »

What the hell is with the right-wing ideological fascination with keeping the border closed, anyway? It reeks of racism and cultural snobbishness; I was talking with my uncle(!) about this, and he seriously averred that Mexican immigration is on the whole a bad thing because "they will bring their corrupt way of life to America". I think it's the right-wing belief that America is a city on a hill, a beacon to the rest of the world; as a corollary, if we let the rest of the world in to our country, they'll put out our light.

In any case, the immigration debate would benefit from a good dose of basic economics. Shortages & surpluses are price phenomena: if there's illegal immigration, it's the result of a quota that doesn't meet demand. It seems clear that the people coming to the US are going to be better-off than in their original country; and they bring labor, decreasing prices and making people in the US better-off. Open immigration is a win-win situation.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Glocksman »

Surlethe wrote:What the hell is with the right-wing ideological fascination with keeping the border closed, anyway? It reeks of racism and cultural snobbishness; I was talking with my uncle(!) about this, and he seriously averred that Mexican immigration is on the whole a bad thing because "they will bring their corrupt way of life to America". I think it's the right-wing belief that America is a city on a hill, a beacon to the rest of the world; as a corollary, if we let the rest of the world in to our country, they'll put out our light.

In any case, the immigration debate would benefit from a good dose of basic economics. Shortages & surpluses are price phenomena: if there's illegal immigration, it's the result of a quota that doesn't meet demand. It seems clear that the people coming to the US are going to be better-off than in their original country; and they bring labor, decreasing prices and making people in the US better-off. Open immigration is a win-win situation.
Other than those whose wages are decreased by illegal immigration labor, of course.
Pardon me if I resist downward pressure on my wages by encouraging the deportation of illegals and the effective sealing of the border.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Kanastrous »

Less competition for attention in the emergency room is a benefit, too. Fewer unlicensed and uninsured drivers on the road another plus.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Alyeska »

I have no idea why people keep fixating on the "illegal aliens" and "civil rights". Just because they are illegal aliens doesn't mean they forfeit civil rights. Civil rights are considered fundamental rights in most situations. Even if they are illegal, you don't just violate someones rights. By using that wording, the news article is trying to paint a biased picture.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Somehow it seems to be contrary to the very interest your naming (human rights and quality of life) to impose what would inevitably be a incompetence-fraught, civil rights-violating enterprise by trying to deport tens of millions of resident illegals, complete with families of their own. What needs to happen is to increase the quotas of legal immigration for Latin Americans based on demand, and be able to screen and assimilate and manage immigration on an above-the-table basis. Furthermore, wages and working class quality of life is at risk not primarily due to illegals, but due to decades of extreme anti-labor ideology and no-limits on business-elite-friendly policies. It strikes me as tragic and absurd that considering our infrastructure overall has a fucking D that the Society of Civil Engineers say needs 2.2 trillion over 5 years, an unsustainable economic model based on bogus finance, a depreciation and contempt for American manufacturing and industry, an unsustainable energy and transportation system - and we're worried about enough work for American workers, immigrant or native? I'm sorry, look at the wealth inequalities and systemic mismanagement in this country. Its a case of elite primarily white business and political elites playing you off against other workers. While the immigration should be managed and Mexican-U.S. development gaps should be ameliorated by bilateral relations and economic relationships, I cannot see how a hard-nativist position is really merited in this case. Did we fix things for the American worker by slamming the door shut and passing draconian nativist policies in the 1930s? No. We finally rolled back the economic injustice of the Gilded Age with some of a sensible, worker and public-friendly national economic policy. Such is the case now. The American worker should not be adversarial with the Mexican immigrant necessarily. Rather in many cases they are the common victim and known enemy of business elites, and like the white slave-owning class in the South before them, they acutely understand the importance of divide and conquer.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Kanastrous »

^ all of those laudable goals are predicated upon having actual control over the border first.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
bozazz
Youngling
Posts: 97
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:55pm

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by bozazz »

Surlethe wrote:What the hell is with the right-wing ideological fascination with keeping the border closed, anyway? It reeks of racism and cultural snobbishness; I was talking with my uncle(!) about this, and he seriously averred that Mexican immigration is on the whole a bad thing because "they will bring their corrupt way of life to America". I think it's the right-wing belief that America is a city on a hill, a beacon to the rest of the world; as a corollary, if we let the rest of the world in to our country, they'll put out our light.

In any case, the immigration debate would benefit from a good dose of basic economics. Shortages & surpluses are price phenomena: if there's illegal immigration, it's the result of a quota that doesn't meet demand. It seems clear that the people coming to the US are going to be better-off than in their original country; and they bring labor, decreasing prices and making people in the US better-off. Open immigration is a win-win situation.
Sometimes it feels to me as if it is a race issue especially in areas where immigrant populations are large. For instance I live in Calgary, Canada where it's harder for illegal aliens to arrive than it is to the United States. After all most of the people who slip across the US/Mexico borders stay in the US and don't go further north. And in Calgary we have a booming immigrant population and unfortunately an increase in high profile gang shootings that have made us Asians standout as targets.

The only illegal aliens we have to deal with in Canada are people who get in through cargo containers and those who don't leave when their visa expires. So generally you'd think the right-wingers here in Canada would have less to gripe about since we don't have as big a problem with illegal immigrations as the USA. But not really. Since immigrants generally come here by legal means the criticism against immigrants in general is that they are destroying the local culture (Christmas, Easter, etc). And recently "Go home and stop shooting up the city." And my favorite one that was yelled at me and my parents "Why don't you speak English instead of that gooboly gook or go back home!"

If it was only a matter of it just being illegal immigration then I don't think those racist asshats would have had a problem. Now mind you I don't think that's the general sentiment among the population and a much better immigration control should reduce tensions among people who aren't generally racist but don't like illegal immigrants. Unfortunately the people who do seem to cry the loudest about immigrants, from my experience, have been racist. Canada IS my home...
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Kanastrous wrote:^ all of those laudable goals are predicated upon having actual control over the border first.
I already suggested how to fix it. Create an amnesty program, only deport those who are criminals here or in Mexico or other levels of problems. Increase dramatically the quota for Latin American countries based on demand. Create real guest worker programs. Really assimilate the new wave of legal immigrants and amnesty immigrants. Concurrently, fully fund border control (with auxiliary help if necessary) and work to curb abuse. The lower demand for illegal immigration should help them meet in the middle. Heavily criminalize and regulate the knowing employment of (new) unregistered and illegal workers. Make it clear a page has turned into a new era. And work with Mexico and the rest of Central America to develop and provide jobs for its citizens.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Glocksman »

Furthermore, wages and working class quality of life is at risk not primarily due to illegals, but due to decades of extreme anti-labor ideology and no-limits on business-elite-friendly policies.
Exactly.
Which is why I favor a combination of border and employer crackdowns.
If you make employers afraid of being assraped in a Federal pen because the people involved knowingly ignored the legal status of their employees, then you'd see a lot less HR people winking at questionable documents.

Border enforcement prevents people like the rancher in the OP from being between a rock and a hard place while throwing illegal alien employers in the slam attacks the demand side of illegal immigration.

As for those already here, couple an effective border sealing program with amnesty for 'clean' illegals and immediate deportation of those with US or foreign criminal records, and you have a program that I could get behind.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Surlethe »

Glocksman wrote:
Surlethe wrote:In any case, the immigration debate would benefit from a good dose of basic economics. Shortages & surpluses are price phenomena: if there's illegal immigration, it's the result of a quota that doesn't meet demand. It seems clear that the people coming to the US are going to be better-off than in their original country; and they bring labor, decreasing prices and making people in the US better-off. Open immigration is a win-win situation.
Other than those whose wages are decreased by illegal immigration labor, of course.
Pardon me if I resist downward pressure on my wages by encouraging the deportation of illegals and the effective sealing of the border.
With all due respect, I sympathize but disagree with your encouragement of the sealing of the border. The benefits to American society of open borders (greater population base, greater tax base, larger workforce, greater diversity, and, yes, cheaper labor) added to the benefits to immigrants (better-paying jobs than at home, social safety net, relatively less corruption(?), and ideally social and economic mobility) outweigh, I think, the downward pressure on wages that members of the working class will experience.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Rye »

Bilbo wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Bilbo wrote:So a guy detains and then hands over to the border patrol illegal aliens he finds crossing his private property on the Mexcan border. So now a group of Mexican nationals (aka illegal alien scum) are sueing him for violating his civil rights.
"Illegal alien scum"? All Mexican nationals are interchangeable with illegal alien scum?
The "Mexican Nationals" in question are all scumballs he caught illegally crossing our border and trespassing on his land. That makes them scum. So yes every time a Mexican National crosses our border illegally his name becomes synonymous with illegal alien scum.
Of course, most Americans are legal "alien scum" that are only there due to an armed genocidal invasion from foreign nations. ;)
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Glocksman »

Zuul wrote: Of course, most Americans are legal "alien scum" that are only there due to an armed genocidal invasion from foreign nations. ;)
So let the indigenous pursue reparations claims against Great Britain, Spain, France, and the Netherlands. :P
All kidding aside, I see your point but why should the USA in 2008 refuse to enforce its borders?
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by MKSheppard »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:I already suggested how to fix it. Create an amnesty program, only deport those who are criminals here or in Mexico or other levels of problems.
We did that. In 1986. Another right wing site.
Increase dramatically the quota for Latin American countries based on demand.
I've got a better idea! Let's just dig a series of anti-tank ditches 100 yards wide, and about 40 feet deep, lined with 6 inch reinforced concrete at key sections along the border to impede rapid vehicular movement; and aggressively destroy "aid stations" put there by illegal alien supporters. Replace them with rescue beacons which signal the border patrol.

Do a series of highly publicized raids across the country; and make the charges stick. "Oh hi there mr Illegal alien; you get a five year prison term out in Alaska making rocks into smaller ones!" What's that? Your boss knew about it? He gets a job next to you!

And then open up the quotas for legimitate countries. We do not need more peons from Central America. What we need are people who can do more than just manual labor. Like say, unlimited immigration from Europe, Japan, Russia, and perhaps some countries that are borderline first/second world like China and Brazil.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Glocksman »

Glocksman wrote:
Zuul wrote: Of course, most Americans are legal "alien scum" that are only there due to an armed genocidal invasion from foreign nations. ;)
So let the indigenous pursue reparations claims against Great Britain, Spain, France, and the Netherlands. :P
All kidding aside, I see your point but why should the USA in 2009 refuse to enforce its borders?
Bah. I meant to make 2008 read 2009.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Glocksman »

"Oh hi there mr Illegal alien; you get a five year prison term out in Alaska making rocks into smaller ones!" What's that? Your boss knew about it? He gets a job next to you!
Shep, that should read 'What's that? Your boss knew about it? He gets a job next to you for triple your sentence.'

Start seriously attacking the demand side for illegal immigration and watch it drop off.
Keep slapping them on the wrist and nothing will change.

Self interest aside I have more in common with the illegal from Chiapas or Chihuahua state than I do with some bastard on Wall Street.

Much more bullshit and I'll be ready to load my Mosin-Nagant and become a Bolshevik. :P
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

MKSheppard wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:I already suggested how to fix it. Create an amnesty program, only deport those who are criminals here or in Mexico or other levels of problems.
We did that. In 1986. Another right wing site.
Increase dramatically the quota for Latin American countries based on demand.
I've got a better idea! Let's just dig a series of anti-tank ditches 100 yards wide, and about 40 feet deep, lined with 6 inch reinforced concrete at key sections along the border to impede rapid vehicular movement; and aggressively destroy "aid stations" put there by illegal alien supporters. Replace them with rescue beacons which signal the border patrol.

Do a series of highly publicized raids across the country; and make the charges stick. "Oh hi there mr Illegal alien; you get a five year prison term out in Alaska making rocks into smaller ones!" What's that? Your boss knew about it? He gets a job next to you!

And then open up the quotas for legimitate countries. We do not need more peons from Central America. What we need are people who can do more than just manual labor. Like say, unlimited immigration from Europe, Japan, Russia, and perhaps some countries that are borderline first/second world like China and Brazil.
Apparently you don't care about living in a civilized country. Which is fine. Most others disagree, so I am going to disregard your opinion. I am glad that I live in a country that at least keeps its gulags small and specialized and rarely puts people (proportionally) in them. The problem with the 1986 Act was it was poorly implemented and poorly enforced, as they admit (specifically it wasn't coupled with the carrot of expanded legal immigration and guest worker programs and it was not effectively combined with much increased border security and criminal liabilities for employers or sufficient aid and development in Mexico). What does that mean? This is like deciding to slash the entire Armed Forces because procurement has become an across-the-board patronage-ridden idiotic boondoggle. My solution is still the conceptually best one, with your scenario being inconsistent with American human rights standards. Furthermore, you miss the fact I would change the overall immigration quotas to allow many more Mexican immigrants across legally, where they can be controlled, scrutinized, etc. Surely some would still illegally cross, but with enough incentive to do it lawfully, it would be much more successful to control the border without recourse to your ridiculous Eastern Bloc reversed-direction border-security.

And of course your "suggestion" does not come with any economic analysis proving it'd be less economically costly than my proposal or even more successful in the long-run than existing enforcement. And of course it ignores moral culpability for knowingly increasing the likelihood that illegal immigrants would be killed. Border patrol is tasked with enforcing the law. People suspected of breaking the law should not be carelessly put at risk of personal harm or death.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Guardsman Bass »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:I already suggested how to fix it. Create an amnesty program, only deport those who are criminals here or in Mexico or other levels of problems.
We did that. In 1986. Another right wing site.
Increase dramatically the quota for Latin American countries based on demand.
I've got a better idea! Let's just dig a series of anti-tank ditches 100 yards wide, and about 40 feet deep, lined with 6 inch reinforced concrete at key sections along the border to impede rapid vehicular movement; and aggressively destroy "aid stations" put there by illegal alien supporters. Replace them with rescue beacons which signal the border patrol.

Do a series of highly publicized raids across the country; and make the charges stick. "Oh hi there mr Illegal alien; you get a five year prison term out in Alaska making rocks into smaller ones!" What's that? Your boss knew about it? He gets a job next to you!

And then open up the quotas for legimitate countries. We do not need more peons from Central America. What we need are people who can do more than just manual labor. Like say, unlimited immigration from Europe, Japan, Russia, and perhaps some countries that are borderline first/second world like China and Brazil.
Apparently you don't care about living in a civilized country. Which is fine. Most others disagree, so I am going to disregard your opinion. I am glad that I live in a country that at least keeps its gulags small and specialized and rarely puts people (proportionally) in them. The problem with the 1986 Act was it was poorly implemented and poorly enforced, as they admit (specifically it wasn't coupled with the carrot of expanded legal immigration and guest worker programs and it was not effectively combined with much increased border security and criminal liabilities for employers or sufficient aid and development in Mexico). What does that mean? This is like deciding to slash the entire Armed Forces because procurement has become an across-the-board patronage-ridden idiotic boondoggle. My solution is still the conceptually best one, with your scenario being inconsistent with American human rights standards. Furthermore, you miss the fact I would change the overall immigration quotas to allow many more Mexican immigrants across legally, where they can be controlled, scrutinized, etc. Surely some would still illegally cross, but with enough incentive to do it lawfully, it would be much more successful to control the border without recourse to your ridiculous Eastern Bloc reversed-direction border-security.
The thing about your proposal is that it would entail bringing in a lot more legal Latin American immigrants in order to eliminate illegal Latin American immigration (although guest worker programs would ameliorate this a bit, and perhaps re-establish circularity like what existed back in 1967-1985). Shep was supporting limitations on the number of hispanics brought in, period. Racist, probably, but there are some concerns - as Shep mentioned, they tend to be poor (and not infrequently low-skilled, which means that they compete with native low-skilled workers), which means that you would see a rise in demand for various services like food stamps and so forth after creating greatly increased legalization and guest worker programs (right now, illegal immigrants don't generally have access to federal aid programs).

One thing about a guest worker program - it needs to be set up so that the guest workers can move around between jobs. The last such program, the bracero program, has a very bad name because responsibility for distributing the guest worker passes and bringing the workers in lay with the employers, who were often abusive. You almost need something more than a federally sponsored international temp agency.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

I'm not saying we should expect nothing of them, but everyone is assuming they have basically zero upward mobility. I doubt this. Based on statistics gathered by looking at the demographics on top of the table, we could draw up decent policy toward giving them incentives to return to the U.S. and build civic responsibility. And nothing's to say that if they commit a crime while being integrated they might not be then ejected and barred from return. But the vast majority would love to have some way to come here and not risk their lives doing so, and have to live in fear of being expelled or abused once here. And of course I would commit us to serious bilateral economic relationships in exchange for serious economic assistance and development assistance for Mexico (remember, they are a major oil exporter to us, so they have assets in our relationship too). And of course, as Glocksman notes, they come here because THEY KNOW THERE ARE JOBS FOR THEM. If we had less employer abuse (and Shep's article admitted last time they totally dropped the ball on enforcement on the demand side, which is quintessential), then the demand to immigrate would drop precipitously. Illegal immigration is already estimated down because of the collapse of our economy, so that proves immigration is elastic based on available jobs for illegal immigrants. Control the supply side and limit the demand, and the problem will be managed.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Count Chocula
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1821
Joined: 2008-08-19 01:34pm
Location: You've asked me for my sacrifice, and I am winter born

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Count Chocula »

Surlethe wrote:Open immigration is a win-win situation.
I'm not singling out Surlethe, but using the quote as a jumping-off point.

One thing that makes Mexican/South American illegal immigration deleterious to America is the lack of integration. Unlike other great immigration waves, like those from Ireland, Germany, China during railroad construction, Cuba when Castro took power, etc. The vast majority of immigrants to the US, at least until the 1970s, were legal immigrants who had every opportunity to assimilate and become Americans.

For the past twenty years Mexican immigrants in particular have not integrated into their communities. On the whole, these are individuals who, in their millions, violated American law to come into the US, further violate American law to work, often work without documentation or falsify it (i.e. using false or stolen SSNs to get a job), and hide in the shadows when they're not waiting for a job at an intersection or a Home Depot parking lot. They also often bring the cultural norms they used south of the border with them: litter, vandalism, sleeping 12 to a 2-bedroom apartment, machismo, and so on. Much of the money they do earn goes to Mexico, which is not a net US benefit; last time I read the figures, about $40 billion of Mexico's economy was attributed to money wired 'home' from illegals living in the US. Note that I'm talking only about those who come here and get jobs, and not MS13 gangsters or other criminals; the murders, assaults and other outrages committed by Mexican illegals in the US is another thread of itself.

Because illegal aliens are here illegally, and KNOW they're here illegally, they avoid mainstream interaction as much as possible. That keeps them isolated from the wider American culture. They largely continue the habits learned growing up in a corrupt, impoverished, chauvinistic, socialistic, oligarchical culture, which habits are antithetical to American ideals and behavior. Once they're here for a while, the mindset with some seems to be "well I got away with sneaking in, let's see what else I can get away with." In the real world, this means that illegal immigrant neighborhoods have more crime, more poverty, more police calls, more trash, and a much, much lower standard of living than American communities next door to them. A one-hour drive through and around Phoenix, AZ or Riverside, CA will show you just how stark the differences are.

Then there's the economic cost. No valid SSN means no insurance coverage, which translates into higher hospital bills for American citizens for treatment of people who in many cases can't even speak English. No legitimate residency of aliens means they will work for less than an American worker can afford to do: some, not all, but some, businesses take advantage of that fact and hire illegal aliens until they're caught (like Tyson Foods); wages for Americans are depressed. No conformity with American standards of cleanliness, hygiene or respect for property translates into - to put it bluntly - shitty neighborhoods where illegals live that drive down property values in adjacent neighborhoods. No shared cultural values means that illegals perform careless, thoughtless, violent acts that are ignored in their home countries but are crimes here in America, where the standards are a bit higher; more costs for law enforcement, the courts, penal system, etc.

Net-net, it's a big loss for Americans, and not a great deal for the illegals. Back to the topic, I have nothing but sympathy for the rancher and his family who have put up with shit for ten years, and nothing but scorn for the head-up-his-ass judge who decided there was enough 'evidence' to send this case to trial.
Image
The only people who were safe were the legion; after one of their AT-ATs got painted dayglo pink with scarlet go faster stripes, they identified the perpetrators and exacted revenge. - Eleventh Century Remnant

Lord Monckton is my heeerrooo

"Yeah, well, fuck them. I never said I liked the Moros." - Shroom Man 777
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Guardsman Bass »

The employers tend to be one of the two problems upon which almost every piece of immigration reform founders (the other being the hard-core nativists). They've been doing the "cheap Mexican labor" deal since the late 19th century, when the Chinese Exclusion Act and Gentleman's Agreement cut off the flow of Chinese and Japanese immigrants (it's an interesting bit of alternative history to consider what might have happened had the above not occurred. The US might have a significantly higher Asian-origin population). If you crack down on them, even if you bring in a considerable amount in terms of guest workers, a lot of industries and businesses (particularly agriculture) will suffer. Personally, I consider that acceptable, since it would really help to deal with one of law enforcement's major issues (the others being the War on Drugs, etc), but it is a cost we will probably end up taking, and the employers won't be quiet about (one of the things they brought up the last time, back when IRCA came into effect, was "Do you want your food grown in the US or Mexico?"
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Posner
Youngling
Posts: 137
Joined: 2008-09-16 06:00pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Posner »

Aratech wrote:
I think I'll have a chat with my Property Law and Torts professors over this, see what grounds they may have for a suit under some obscure law I've not yet learned.
Gunner. :)
In Soviet Union, God created Man - Yakov Smirnoff
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: Trespassing illegals sue property owner - Huhh?

Post by Guardsman Bass »

Count Chocula wrote:
Surlethe wrote:Open immigration is a win-win situation.
I'm not singling out Surlethe, but using the quote as a jumping-off point.

One thing that makes Mexican/South American illegal immigration deleterious to America is the lack of integration. Unlike other great immigration waves, like those from Ireland, Germany, China during railroad construction, Cuba when Castro took power, etc. The vast majority of immigrants to the US, at least until the 1970s, were legal immigrants who had every opportunity to assimilate and become Americans.
They were legal, but integration didn't go as smoothly as you think it did - there were enclaves of German-speaking areas in Wisconsin and other areas of the Midwest, for example, that held out for decades.
For the past twenty years Mexican immigrants in particular have not integrated into their communities. On the whole, these are individuals who, in their millions, violated American law to come into the US, further violate American law to work, often work without documentation or falsify it (i.e. using false or stolen SSNs to get a job), and hide in the shadows when they're not waiting for a job at an intersection or a Home Depot parking lot. They also often bring the cultural norms they used south of the border with them: litter, vandalism, sleeping 12 to a 2-bedroom apartment, machismo, and so on. Much of the money they do earn goes to Mexico, which is not a net US benefit; last time I read the figures, about $40 billion of Mexico's economy was attributed to money wired 'home' from illegals living in the US. Note that I'm talking only about those who come here and get jobs, and not MS13 gangsters or other criminals; the murders, assaults and other outrages committed by Mexican illegals in the US is another thread of itself.
The "not integrated" argument is bullshit. Just take a look at third-generation hispanics, only 4-5% of whom are able to speak Spanish on average, for example - they're as American anyone else. Moreover, not every illegal immigrant is coming here to permanently settle - in fact, in past times, the movement was usually circular; they'd come north, work a while, then go back with the money. It was like this from 1967-1985, when 28 million Mexican migrants came to the US - and 23.5 million of them went home.

As for the remittances, they generally go into investing in Mexico and Mexican infrastructure (the Mexican government actually has a "matching" program if the money goes to infrastructure, if I recall correctly). You know, the type of things that generate economic growth in Mexico and help to reduce northward migration.
Because illegal aliens are here illegally, and KNOW they're here illegally, they avoid mainstream interaction as much as possible. That keeps them isolated from the wider American culture. They largely continue the habits learned growing up in a corrupt, impoverished, chauvinistic, socialistic, oligarchical culture, which habits are antithetical to American ideals and behavior. Once they're here for a while, the mindset with some seems to be "well I got away with sneaking in, let's see what else I can get away with." In the real world, this means that illegal immigrant neighborhoods have more crime, more poverty, more police calls, more trash, and a much, much lower standard of living than American communities next door to them. A one-hour drive through and around Phoenix, AZ or Riverside, CA will show you just how stark the differences are.
Do you have any proof that this extends beyond the first generation, on average, or that illegal immigrant slums are worse than, say, slums in other parts of the US where the inhabitants are native (like certain inner city areas)?
Then there's the economic cost. No valid SSN means no insurance coverage, which translates into higher hospital bills for American citizens for treatment of people who in many cases can't even speak English. No legitimate residency of aliens means they will work for less than an American worker can afford to do: some, not all, but some, businesses take advantage of that fact and hire illegal aliens until they're caught (like Tyson Foods); wages for Americans are depressed. No conformity with American standards of cleanliness, hygiene or respect for property translates into - to put it bluntly - shitty neighborhoods where illegals live that drive down property values in adjacent neighborhoods. No shared cultural values means that illegals perform careless, thoughtless, violent acts that are ignored in their home countries but are crimes here in America, where the standards are a bit higher; more costs for law enforcement, the courts, penal system, etc.
I'm waiting for proof on this. The claim that illegal immigrants are responsible for a great deal of crime is a common claim of anti-immigration advocates, but where are the crime statistics and studies?
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
Post Reply