While DNA evidence is frequently taken, in the US all too often is not processed. Testing is expensive, and budgets tight, so evidence labs in the US have shelves and shelves of such things waiting, waiting, waiting to be tested. In some cases victims have paid for their evidence to be processed rather than waiting for years, or possibly never. Evidence is taken, but there is no requirement to process it.Shroom Man 777 wrote:Aha. I see. But this case was fairly recent. So how can the DNA evidence be not tested when the case was ongoing? Why did it have to take a re-examination, after the poor man was already behind bars for years, for accurate conclusions? That just sucks. What the hell were they doing, then, when the case was still ongoing and when the evidence was first processed?
Frankly, for a false accusation of that nature the women (in my opinion) should serve the same sentence handed down to the falsely accused. And the conviction should be be completely purged from the man's record (which, believe is or not, is NOT automatic in the US).