Flagg wrote:SVPD wrote:I should point out for the benefit of those that don't get it, that comparing this to a domestic violence incident is spurious, at best. Husbands and wives or other family relationships should not be hitting each other regardless. In this situation, however, the officer was attempting to issue a citation for jaywalking and evidently "tensions escalated". (I have a hard time imagining that the laws in Washington allow you to make a custodial arrest for jaywalking, so I imagine where the paper says "tensions escalated" they really mean "the women started doing other things we won't mention to avoid messing up our neat little attempt to make the cop punching one of them into a nig deal.")
I'll assume you made an accidentally racist typo there and ignore that bit.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Heh, it appears I did. I actually couldn't find it at first.
I do agree that the media in the area is definitely pushing a "Seattle cops are out of control and police brutality is rampant" angle on this. Every time the story has run they bring up an incident from a few weeks ago where a cop was clearly guilty of brutality on a man in handcuffs that was racially motivated (though for some reason they keep saying that calling him a "fucking Mexican" is a slur) so it's pretty transparent.
That's precisely the problem with the media. They've got a story from a few weeks ago that would push public outrage and they see an opportunity to keep it in the forefront with this one, so screw the facts. It's not a "big conspiracy"; it's the media being a buisness and trying to make a profit, just like they do on.. geez, practically everything else.
s to the comments about police procedure, no, the problem isn't police procedure. If anything it's jaywalking laws. For that, the public has elected representatives who can change them. However, there is nothing wrong with jaywalking laws, and no reason they should be changed jsut because some people think they'r too inconvenient to obey.
Frankly, I wouldn't write someone a ticket for jaywalking unless they caused or almost caused an accident, but that doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the laws as they stand. If you want to be a scofflaw and ignore them, go ahead. If it ends in a ticket, that doesn't mean you got a bullshit ticket; it means you gambled and lost.
The real problem here though, isn't the teenagers, the cop, or even the media. IT's the "community leaders" trying to make hay with it. I particularly like the one who says she "doesn't condone being disrespectful to the police" but then says she can't support th epolcie using violence. Talk about selective memory of what happened. Shoving someone is assault, not just "disrespect", and using violence in order to control violent people is part of the job of the police. Excessive violence is a problem sure, but there was no excessive force in this case. Not a single one of the people complaining had anything other than vague ranting about being sick and tired, or a version of the incident that doesn't fit with the video.
I'm glad the police commander had the balls to come right out and say "this video justifies the officer's actions and that sort of behavior will be met with force." and the assistant chief, thankfully, came right out and said "we don't want officers avoiding appropriate action and then getting hurt out of concern over how it will look on video."
Shit like this is why I'm kind of glad it isn't legal to go around punching people in the crotch. You'd be able to track my movement from orbit from the sheer mass of idiots I'd leave lying on the ground clutching their privates in my wake. -- Mr. Coffee