The Executive Branch is under no obligation to enforce laws made by Congress or decisions of the Court. Andrew Jackson proved that less than 50 years in.Bakustra wrote:Don't Ask Don't Tell was enacted into law by Congress, so him refusing to enforce it is a) a dangerous precedent and b) a major talking point for the midterm elections and the 2012 elections.
Repeal of DADT up for vote in the Senate
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Gil Hamilton
- Tipsy Space Birdie
- Posts: 12962
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
- Contact:
Re: Repeal of DADT up for vote in the Senate
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert
"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
Re: Repeal of DADT up for vote in the Senate
Oh man, filibusters.
Its a shame political reform is so difficult, because you guys need some.
Its a shame political reform is so difficult, because you guys need some.
Re: Repeal of DADT up for vote in the Senate
Jackson proved that the Supreme Court has no ability to compel its legal decisions nor Congress its statutes beyond the assumed respect for legality the Founders thought presidents would have. Of course, there's little they could have done; if someone is hostile towards the rule of law and gains power, they can destroy the government quite effectively. Thankfully, all Jackson did was commit a little mass murder and relocation, but his is not an example to be emulated, but a cautionary tale.Gil Hamilton wrote:The Executive Branch is under no obligation to enforce laws made by Congress or decisions of the Court. Andrew Jackson proved that less than 50 years in.Bakustra wrote:Don't Ask Don't Tell was enacted into law by Congress, so him refusing to enforce it is a) a dangerous precedent and b) a major talking point for the midterm elections and the 2012 elections.
Let's ignore the considerations of history and move to practicality. How often is that done today? If the executive could refuse to enforce laws whenever it wanted to, then things would become even more politicized, as shit like healthcare gets shut down with the next Republican president or whatever. If you really think that DADT is worth risking the concept of rule of law over, well, that is your prerogative.
Truer words have seldom been spoken.Stark wrote:Oh man, filibusters.
Its a shame political reform is so difficult, because you guys need some.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
-
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 6464
- Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
- Location: SoCal
Re: Repeal of DADT up for vote in the Senate
Yeah, Conservatives already come as close as possible to saying (without saying it) that this administration makes up its own law as it goes along, anyway.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011