The meaning is obvious from context - he is talking about people getting help from others and having access to infrastructure before the one sentence that can - in isolation - be misinterpreted, and he is talking about infrastructure making success possible after that one sentence.Simon_Jester wrote:I don't think it is. People can misinterpret that by accident, not just on purpose. Sure, the meaning from context is clear to you. That's because you already think that you know what he was going to say.
Someone with different expectations who reads the same words sees it the other way around. The text itself is ambiguous.
The text itself - in context - is not ambiguous.
Thats exactly what I mean. Parts of the media deliberately distort what was said, rip things out of context, and thereby make it possible for (somewhat) reasonable people to be mislead. The MSM is absolutely horrid at fighting these attempts at distortions and misrepresenations being thrown about (mostly by Republicans, but with some stuff from Democrats too). In fact, the US MSM does not even see it as its role to fight that type of thing.PainRack wrote:Dude. You're assuming that people actually saw the speech he gave, instead of the distorted one Fox and other news media created, and then which the other parts of the mainstream news media addressed.
The MSM can be as factually accurate as they want to, but still present a picture of the truth that is misrepresented by people.
The Republicans are trying to find out just how far they can go with that type of thing - and I'm very interested in seeing just exactly how much they can get away with.