K. A. Pital wrote:Are you being sarcastic here? I see nothing to laugh about, really. Greece has a huge and oversized military burden; the cuts to the military spending were okayed by both Greece, EC and European leaders. The only party that said no was the IMF, because, well, the pensions are not being cut by 400 million EUR - which is what it wants, and a military cut of the same size is not enough. In the light of this, I think Greece should really try to drive a wedge between the "troika" and tell the IMF to go to hell.
FTeik wrote:
Concerning the IWF forbidding spending cuts for the military. This is obviously done in the best interest of the Greek, so they can defend themselves, should the evil Germans decide to size Greek assets by force.
More seriously, why does Greece need the permission of the IWF, if it wants to cut spending on its own. And if that really is the case, I would totally agree, if those responsible get ferrocrete-shoes and dropped into the mediterran. Might also give the fish a change from fugative.
Starglider wrote:
Awful decisions were made in the 2000s and yes the Greek population bears some responsibility for electing crooks, but consider the options and information available. If the supposedly professional EU beurecrats and bankers believed the fake promises and statistics coming out of the Greek government immediately prior to and after joining the euro, how do you expect the electorate to do better? In terms of blame, the Greek electorate has been punnished more than enough for electing those politicians. Of course the politicians, bankers and beurecrats themselves have got away scot free, indeed usually with massive bonuses, bribes, promotions and pensions. And of course any Greeks under 30 had no say in that turn-of-the-millenium politicing.
At this point a majority of Greek population has experienced significant hardship, and a sizable minority has experienced severe hardship, for over half a decade. This is going to continue for the foreseeable future regardless of what option is chosen, the main question being how many decades it will continue and how much worse it's going to get before the turnaround.
There are several practical reasons why (electronically) printing up a half-trillion euros and paying off all the periphery debts might be a bad idea, but at this point there is no ethical case for 'revenge' against the Greek populace, if indeed there ever was. Honestly I would just say print to the moon at this point, northern Europe deserves to take some inflation more than southern Europe deserves to live with odious debt indefinitely. Or rather I would say that if I thought that preserving the eurozone was a good thing.
This isn't about "revenge".
As much as I want to sympathize with the common greek,
when I hear, that five years after the Lagarde-List out of 2,000 suspected tax evaders less than twenty have been investigated,
when I hear, that Germany and France offered to help to establish an efficient revenue-service and were refused,
when I hear, that states like Slovakia, which are still poorer than Greece have to contribute to the bailout,
and so on,
then it is hard to feel sympathy.
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.
"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.