Shinova wrote:On a similar note, how smart is someone if that person got a 142 on the IQ test?
(said person is the same person who said the US is not much different from third-world countries)
100 is the average for the world as a whole. If he actually had a real test (not an internet one) that put him at 142, he would be in the top few percent of the world. However, over the years, various groups I'm in will have an internet IQ test posted, we'll all run off and take it, and 140 is about the average for the group--dumb people tend not to hang out in group like this too long--so it's not like he's above anyone else.
The more important issue is what is his education background. For example, an eighth grader may be smart, but odds are he's not able to analyze economic, political, foreign policy, etc data for form such an analysis, and hence is just wanking off to David Duke or Noam Chomsky or the like. You can probably guess this is true
if he didn't provide any reason for such a statement. You can also probably guess if he gave his IQ as backing to his claim. That is unprovable and irrelevant to the point at hand--it would just be designed to intimidate and impress.
Moving on...
From an old social studies course, I remember the three world classification as
1st world=developed democracies,
2nd world=commies,
3rd world= everyone else (typically underdeveloped dictatorships).
1st and 3rd world are differentiated from each other by wealth and political systems. The 2nd world is a general label for all communist countries regardless of any other concerns. As such, North Korea, likely the poorest most repressed hell hole outside of Hell itself, would be a 2nd world country.