Dubya Snorted Coke In WH -Kitty Kelley

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-09-06 08:48pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:Because they were lies and TV stations are not supposed to air ads they know -or should know- are false.
So that means most car ads have to be pulled?

That's it. I've had it. My ad blocker is now configured to block that fucking "twisted" smiley along with the "evil" one.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-09-06 08:51pm

Durandal wrote:That's it. I've had it. My ad blocker is now configured to block that fucking "twisted" smiley along with the "evil" one.

Why?

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-09-06 08:53pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote: The ones that are demonstrably false, yes.
So are you saying that footage that the SVFT are using of John Kerry
from the 1970s is a blatant fabricaton by the VRWC using advanced
digital editing technicques to put words in John's mouth?

It's the same as when the ad agency for a bad movie gets a hold of a quote from a critic that reads "It's amazing -no, unbelievable how such a bad movie can ever see the light of day." and cuts it down to "It's amazing -no, unbelievable!" for the newspaper ads.

I see you're conceding again, Shep. But let's get back to Kelley's book, shall we?

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-09-06 08:54pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Durandal wrote:That's it. I've had it. My ad blocker is now configured to block that fucking "twisted" smiley along with the "evil" one.
Why?

Because people like you and Ein over-use it (along with that "evil" one, which I hate even more), and it's stupid-looking. God I'm glad I don't have to look at that fucking thing again.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-09-06 08:54pm

Elfdart wrote:I see you're conceding again, Shep. But let's get back to Kelley's book, shall we?[/i]

Thanks for conceeding on Moore's documentaries

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-09-06 08:55pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:Just a few weeks ago, you were pimping a Kerry-bashing article from one of Scaife's newspapers

Who the fuck is Scaife?

Don't play dumb -er, dumber.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-09-06 08:56pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:I see you're conceding again, Shep. But let's get back to Kelley's book, shall we?[/i]
Thanks for conceeding on Moore's documentaries

Moore's documentaries have absolutely nothing to do with this thread. Stop trying to hijack it.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-09-06 08:57pm

Elfdart wrote:Don't play dumb -er, dumber.

No Seriously, what's so evil about the guy?

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-09-06 09:59pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:Don't play dumb -er, dumber.
No Seriously, what's so evil about the guy?

CONFESSION! So you admit you were playing dumber. Jackass.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-09-06 10:10pm

Elfdart wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:Don't play dumb -er, dumber.
No Seriously, what's so evil about the guy?
CONFESSION! So you admit you were playing dumber. Jackass.

No, he's admitting that he doesn't know what the hell you're talking about. That's hardly playing dumb if he honestly doesn't know. I don't know either, and after all this I'm interested to hear. Now explain what you're on about or shut up.

Glocksman · Post by **Glocksman** » 2004-09-06 10:50pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:Just a few weeks ago, you were pimping a Kerry-bashing article from one of Scaife's newspapers

Who the fuck is Scaife?

CNN on Scaife

WASHINGTON (April 27) -- Who is Richard Scaife? He's a 65-year-old billionaire Republican wielding power from the shadows.

According to President Bill Clinton's allies, he's the main money man behind a right-wing anti-Clinton conspiracy, attacking with his money. Former White House counsel Lanny Davis argues, "He's using it to destroy a president of the United States."

If it's a conspiracy, it's a pretty open one. Scaife's tax-exempt foundations disclose their grants on the Web. Among them: $2.4 million over several years to American Spectator to pay for anti-Clinton reporting, even a private eye to dig up dirt. And millions more went to other anti-Clinton groups.

He's the right wing equivalent to George Soros.

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-09-06 11:27pm

Glocksman wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:
Elfdart wrote:Just a few weeks ago, you were pimping a Kerry-bashing article from one of Scaife's newspapers

Who the fuck is Scaife?
CNN on Scaife

WASHINGTON (April 27) -- Who is Richard Scaife? He's a 65-year-old billionaire Republican wielding power from the shadows.

According to President Bill Clinton's allies, he's the main money man behind a right-wing anti-Clinton conspiracy, attacking with his money. Former White House counsel Lanny Davis argues, "He's using it to destroy a president of the United States."

If it's a conspiracy, it's a pretty open one. Scaife's tax-exempt foundations disclose their grants on the Web. Among them: $2.4 million over several years to American Spectator to pay for anti-Clinton reporting, even a private eye to dig up dirt. And millions more went to other anti-Clinton groups.
He's the right wing equivalent to George Soros.

Soros never paid a man to lie in court. Scaife did with convict David Hale.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-09-07 04:08am

Elfdart wrote:CONFESSION! So you admit you were playing dumber. Jackass.

No fuckdart, I don't spend every moment of my waking time
carefully memorizing every denigrating name and KKKonspiracy
theory of the far left's fever swamp.

I do like how you dismiss reputable papers as garbage on the basis
of some conspiracy theory over their owners, et al.

So, does that mean the NYT should be exempt from being regarded
as a serious paper, as it's an Israeli mouthpiece?

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-09-07 11:55am

Durandal wrote:That's it. I've had it. My ad blocker is now configured to block that fucking "twisted" smiley along with the "evil" one.

Please, think of the children. We can't allow their pure fragile minds to be corrupted by the horrors of the "twisted" smiley and the "evil" one, it'll turn them into devil worshiping Satanists.

And we also need to eliminate the

avatar, for the children, please, won't someone please think of the children?

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-09-07 12:00pm

aerius wrote: Please, think of the children. We can't allow their pure fragile minds to be corrupted by the horrors of the "twisted" smiley and the "evil" one, it'll turn them into devil worshiping Satanists.

And we also need to eliminate the avatar, for the children, please, won't someone please think of the children?

BWHAHAHAHAHAH

That man supports anal sex, too! Please, think of the children! Don't alllow
their minds to be warped by that filthy sodomite!