The problem with the sink-or-swim approach is that nobody has any idea what to do with the kids who sink. There are multiple approaches to how to teach English as a seond language, though. From what I've seen, it seems it's best to try to get them into regular classes as soon as possible. With little kids and an intense ESL program, you can have them speaking fluently in less than a year. Older kids are trickier, because once they lose childrens' language acquisition skills, it's just as hard to teach them English as it is to teach Anglo teenagers Spanish.Tsyroc wrote:I haven't kept up on this and the results of the different types of teaching seem to go back and forth as to which is best. I just thought that the last I had heard that the ESL version eventually works better although in the begining it's tougher.Xero Cool Down wrote: From what I've heard on the news ESL students usually do much worse in school if they are stuck in English only classes because they can't understand what the teacher is saying, which is not to say that they shouldn't be taught proper English as soon as possible so that they can be in English speaking class.
I most certainly can be wrong on this since, like I said, I haven't kept up on it, and it's been a few years since it was making big news down here.
In the case of Ebonics, you won't have the problem of older kids entering the system with no Standard English skills the way you do with new arrivals from Mexico. And it's easier to go between dialects than it is between languages. If their idea is to teach Ebonics speaking kids Standard English as a second language, then recognizing Ebonics is a good idea. The word "affirm" is what bothers me. It smells of mollycoddling them instead of telling them, "The people who will hire you for a job and read your college applications don't speak the way you do. You have to learn to speak like they do so they'll listen."