Wrecks of HK Kormoran and HMAS Sydney found

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
brianeyci
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9815
Joined: 2004-09-26 05:36pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by brianeyci »

Darth Onasi wrote:I figure that in the common mindset of many people, warships are meant to go down in great fleet battles or a tremendous blaze of glory where they take out 2 dozen enemies or something.

A short engagement where a ship is essentially ambushed and sunk isn't enough. Despite the fact that in this case the Sydney took it's attacker with it to the bottom.
The funny part is I always had the complete opposite idea. I thought of ships as paper tigers, sinking to a single shot or a single torpedo. Reading about Yamato convinced me even more that boats were floating coffins (whether true or not.)

I had another thought coming home, and that is the conspiracy theory makes a little more sense with a bit of truth in it. All lies do. Especially what Thanas said about the "Germans machine gunning survivors." The truth is 1. Hitler's orders to take no prisoners on submarines and 2. The fact that nobody on the Sydney survived, that the ship was lost with all hands. So the conspiracy puts 1 and 2 together and... machine gunned Aussies. Looking on Google there's even a guy who cites a bullet found in a washed up body as proof, nevermind the fact the merchant raider machine gunned the deck is not in dispute.

Of course the conspiracy theorists expect all the German sailors to be evil Nazi scum explaining why they haven't broken the silence by now.
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

To contrast Yamato, take a look at Musashi, which sustained an incredible 17 torpedo and 20 bomb hits and 18 near misses before sinking slowly and intact without explosions.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Post by Thanas »

^I must admit that I do not quite get the context of that comment, your grace.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote: Actually, it's true--the magazine explosion happened after the battle. That implies that the crew lost the battle to control the ship's damage. It's not impossible that she could have been saved. Likely the fact that a very large portion of the crew had been killed or wounded as they were not at stations when the Germans began to sweep the decks with autocannon fire was what contributed to her demise; damage control is really all about having lots of skilled people able to respond instantly.
Remember that at this point in time British built warships didn’t have ANY auxiliary power at all; expect maybe some batteries to work the radio. They also didn’t even have decent numbers of flashlights and had generally flawed detailed design (like machinery wing compartments near certain to cause capsizing). That means if Sydney lost electrical power and had a major fire going and flooding she’d be almost certainly doomed.
The Duchess of Zeon wrote:To contrast Yamato, take a look at Musashi, which sustained an incredible 17 torpedo and 20 bomb hits and 18 near misses before sinking slowly and intact without explosions.
It’s not clear she actually took so many torpedo hits, reports from aircraft are near useless and some survivors claimed it could not have been possible to know, at least ten is certain though. But anyway, hit placement was key, the torpedoes evenly hit both sides and mostly hit the bow, many hits wasted themselves damaging already flooded compartments. Yamato meanwhile took almost all torpedo hits on one side, in one case seven striking in rapid succession, and capsized even after counter flooding half of her machinery.

Subdivision on the Yamato class really sucked. They had about 10% more watertight compartments then Nagato on twice the displacement. A single torpedo hit could cause 3,000 tons of flooding even when striking the thickest part of the TDS, which was hopelessly flawed all in its own right.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Thanas wrote:^I must admit that I do not quite get the context of that comment, your grace.
In reference to eyci mentioning that he thought it was normally for ships to be easily killed. Which is manifestly not the case; it's really all across the board. The German battlecruisers at Skaggerak for instance were far more resistant than the British, to the point of being their exact opposites in damage handled.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote: In reference to eyci mentioning that he thought it was normally for ships to be easily killed. Which is manifestly not the case; it's really all across the board. The German battlecruisers at Skaggerak for instance were far more resistant than the British, to the point of being their exact opposites in damage handled.
They did do better, but exact opposites, I think not. If they’d had British ammunition then at least two of them would have blown up too. As it was the British ships that didn’t suffer magazine explosions held up to some non trivial levels of damage, several remained in action with over a dozen heavy hits. Some of the German ships that survived were effectively out of action, like Von Der Tann, which fought much of the battle with one gun in one turret firing under manual power only. The survival of Seydlitz was epic, but only possible because she was able to run herself aground at several points along the short trip home.






Edit: found I still have a listing I made a while back of what sank all of Japanese WW2 cruisers, which shows the diversity of damage that can be fatal and the tendency to overkill anything that stops moving. The Japanese heavy cruisers are for the most part big tough ships, but the light cruiser… ugh even Sydney can clearly outmatch every single one of them. Many sank from one torpedo, but a number also did previously survive single torpedoes.

In some cases I have excluded minor damage taken before the sinking but not repaired, as I judged it not relevant to the ships loss. Note also that more ships then listed suffered explosions of its own torpedoes but I have not always mentioned this, since in many cases the vessel was already clearly lost by the time the warheads detonated.

Fatal Damage Inflicted On Japanese Cruisers

Heavy Cruisers

Kako – 3 Mk10 submarine torpedo hits
Furutaka – 24 x 6in and 8in shells
Kinugasa – 1 x 500lb bomb hit, 1 x 1000lb near miss bomb
Aoba – 1 x 500lb bomb hit, 1 x 2000lb near miss bomb

Myoko – scuttled postwar after being crippled by a single submarine torpedo
Nachi – the ship that wouldn’t die – 9 x aerial torpedoes, 20 x aerial bombs, 16 aerail rockets
Ashigara – 5 x submarine torpedoes
Haguro – 3 x destroyer torpedoes

Takao – scuttled postwar after being crippled by two submarine torpedoes
Atago – 4 x Mk14 submarine torpedoes
Maya – 4 x Mk14 submarine torpedoes
Chokai – crippled by a single 500lb bomb, scuttled during battle off Samar

Mogami – 15-25 8in shell hits + 2 x 500lb bomb hits
Mikuma – 5 x 500lb and 1000lb bomb hits explode ships Long Lance torpedoes, companion at the time Mogami jettisons torpedoes and survived at least seven hits
Suzuya – 1 x near miss disables a shaft, second near miss bomb explodes Long Lance torpedoes
Kumano – no one likes Kumano, 8 x aerial torpedoes and 7 x 500lb bomb

Tone – 1 x 500lb bomb, 2 x 1000lb bomb plus near misses, ship beached with main deck above the waterline, raised and scrapped postwar.
Chikuma – crippled by 1 x Mk13 aerial torpedo, scuttled during battle off Samar

Light Cruisers

Kuma – 2 x submarine torpedo
Tama – damaged but amazingly still mobile after 1 x submarine torpedo hit, she was attacked days later by a second sub and broke in half and sank in minutes after three additional hits
Kitakami – survived war having been near missed to the point of engine damage, but never took a direct hit from anything, scrapped
Ooi – 2 x submarine torpedoes, one a dud, broke in half and sank after some hours
Kiso – 3 x 500lb bomb hit and 1 x 500lb near miss

Nagara – 1 x submarine torpedo
Isuzu - 1 x submarine torpedo reduced speed to 10knts, sank in minutes two hours later after a second sub scored two additional hits
Natori – crippled by 1 x Mk23 submarine torpedoe, fatally damaged by a second Mk18 torpedo an hour later
Yura – reduced to 14knts by two bomb hits from dive bombers, crippled several hours later by three more bomb hits from B-17s and dive bombers, scuttled with torpedoes
Kinu – one bomb hit and six near misses
Abukuma – damaged by one PT boat torpedo, hit by three bombs and numerous near misses the next day she remained underway until the fires spread to her torpedoes, four of them exploding, sank two hours later and after abandonment

Sendai – sunk by several 6in shell hits
Naka – broken in half by one aerial torpedo and one bomb, the ends of the wreck remained afloat until being sunk by a follow up dive bombing attack!
Jintsu – crippled by at least 10 x 6in shells and sunk by one surface torpedo

Yubari – 1 x submarine torpedo

Oyodo – sunk by numerous near miss bombs, but had taken 5 x 500lb bomb hits in previous attacks.

Agano – 2 x Mk14 submarine torpedoes
Noshiro – 1 x 500lb near miss, 2 x aerial torpedoes
Yahagi – sunk by a literal rain of aerial torpedoes and bombs, at least seven and twelve respectively, when accompanying Yamato, she was crippled and doomed by the first aerial torpedo hit
Sakawa – not proof against 21kt nuclear airburst at 500 meters, one of the few ships sunk by Test Able, abet only after a day of slow flooding.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
cosmicalstorm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: 2008-02-14 09:35am

Post by cosmicalstorm »

brianeyci wrote:
The funny part is I always had the complete opposite idea. I thought of ships as paper tigers, sinking to a single shot or a single torpedo. Reading about Yamato convinced me even more that boats were floating coffins (whether true or not.)
I've thought about posting a thread about this on this forum, I've heard the opinion many times over the past few years that every large surface ship is basically a big floating coffin, even the US carriers are supposedly vulnerable to mass-missile attacks and such.

Apparently they ran some big test excersize a couple of years ago, and in it an entire CBG was basically wiped out by a kamikaze-attack using inferior technology.
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Post by MKSheppard »

cosmicalstorm wrote:Apparently they ran some big test excersize a couple of years ago, and in it an entire CBG was basically wiped out by a kamikaze-attack using inferior technology.
Oh god no, the van riper exercise just won't die.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
That NOS Guy
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1867
Joined: 2004-12-30 03:14am
Location: Back in Chinatown, hung over

Post by That NOS Guy »

MKSheppard wrote:
cosmicalstorm wrote:Apparently they ran some big test excersize a couple of years ago, and in it an entire CBG was basically wiped out by a kamikaze-attack using inferior technology.
Not even CBGs can defend against Boston Whalers that are for all intensive purposes magical.
Image
User avatar
Vehrec
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2204
Joined: 2006-04-22 12:29pm
Location: The Ohio State University
Contact:

Post by Vehrec »

MKSheppard wrote:
cosmicalstorm wrote:Apparently they ran some big test excersize a couple of years ago, and in it an entire CBG was basically wiped out by a kamikaze-attack using inferior technology.
Oh god no, the van riper exercise just won't die.
What the heck is the background on this? I don't see how that would happen, and the google is vauge on the details except for the fact that he quits in protest near the end of the exercise in a temper tantrum.
ImageCommander of the MFS Darwinian Selection Method (sexual)
User avatar
cosmicalstorm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: 2008-02-14 09:35am

Post by cosmicalstorm »

MKSheppard wrote:
cosmicalstorm wrote:Apparently they ran some big test excersize a couple of years ago, and in it an entire CBG was basically wiped out by a kamikaze-attack using inferior technology.
Oh god no, the van riper exercise just won't die.
Has it been debated on this forum?
I've searched but I could'nt find a relevant thread about it.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Vehrec wrote: What the heck is the background on this? I don't see how that would happen, and the google is vauge on the details except for the fact that he quits in protest near the end of the exercise in a temper tantrum.
Actually he was kicked out by the military for being a cheating asshole, and then ran to the media to bitch and whine. The military didn’t even judge his stupidity worth responding too, which is why about all you will ever find on news sites is one article from some random guy he convinced to give him an interview, or articles which quote that one original article.

Basically what the moron did was order units already destroyed returned to play, for his side only, and then began materializing forces he never even had out of thin air. The thin air being right alongside warships which were then promptly ruled sunk. Some of the armaments he claimed for these magic assets, like Silkworm missiles on a boston whaler, are physically impossible. Once the higher ups overseeing the game noticed this he was thrown out.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Lonestar
Keeper of the Schwartz
Posts: 13321
Joined: 2003-02-13 03:21pm
Location: The Bay Area

Post by Lonestar »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Actually he was kicked out by the military for being a cheating asshole, and then ran to the media to bitch and whine.
He was also my Scoutmaster, waaaaaaay back in '95 when I lived on Camp Lejeune. :)
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
Post Reply