The Duchess of Zeon wrote:ray245 wrote:
How the hell would a Pirates attack Perth when they have more to lose than more to gain? You seriously expect the Navy to be sleeping when one of their major port is being attacked?
Yeah, and then they have hostages and clear out again...
..No, I admit it was rhetorical hyperbole only, and intended only as rhetorical hyperbole, a point to drive home. They'll never attack Perth, but once again, first-world westerners get the best of it. Random coastal villages in India and Indonesia, though? Yes, that will be happening at this rate, and what can anyone do about it, if we don't attack the pirates directly in their lairs in Somalia with heavy firepower? Notice, I don't expect to permanently suppress piracy doing this just once, either--I think bombardments of the Somali coast will simply become a regular feature of naval life if such a policy is implemented.
Well, given the fact that Singapore is pretty near the straits of Malacca and no pirates would ever think of attacking any major coastal areas in our nation, I would say the chances of pirates attacking villages depends on how secure and how well guarded the coastal regions can be and the size of the naval force the nation can afford.
Even then, there is a stark contrast between piracy in the Straits of Malacca and in Somalia. When the regional navies steps up their patrol, the amount of pirate attacks drop by a sizable margin. Moreover, the very fact that Pirates in my region has yet to do something as ridiculous and stupid as attacking a major port in my region basically means that you don't necessary have to resort to bombing all the coastal region and start a firefight with the pirates in order to deter them. An active presence of naval forces alone can deter the pirates well enough.
Bear in mind that an active naval presence in that region was only heavily increased recently, and the fact that an increased naval presence has worked out pretty well in the straits of Malacca in the past few years. Also, from what I gather from the IMB website, the number of successful hijackings has dropped due to the increased naval presence.
A shipping company and most of its crews members as well as their families do not enjoy the idea of a firefight, which basically means you have to go against a person's wishes for personal safety for the sake of blowing pirates up. Should we respect the wishes of the shipping companies and its crew members to have a higher chance of safety due to the fact that they avoided a firefight and paid a ransom?
Also, you would open a lot of legal issues in regards to attacking the pirate bases in places like Somalia. If you argued that it is OK to infringe on a nation sovereignty in regards to piracy issues, then that basically means any navy would have a right to bomb places in Indonesia as well, without the approval of the Indonesian Government.
Hell, with the additional fact that the bases of operation for the pirates are not military based, but rather as a village community with innocents around, how the hell do you avoid the sticky situation of the death of innocents?
Like I said before, as a relative of a person who works actively in the shipping industry, it is not in my personal interest to see him getting killed due to a fire-fight and the navy and policy makers not respecting his desire for his personal safety.
Also, it is funny that see that as a foreign government, you would care more about the people living in another country than a person from your own country.
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.