Woman to replace Alexander Hamilton on $10 bill

[whackadoodle]

There really is one choice of woman who reflects the values, the mores - indeed, the zeitgeist of the age as our first woman-on-paper gangbang.

Nah:

Replace Hamilton with Trump on the other side, and I'm totally down with that. Although I've never done cocaine or hookers, I'd definitely snort hooker off of a cocaine's ass with one of those new bills.

[Flagg]

There really is one choice of woman who reflects the values, the mores - indeed, the zeitgeist of the age as our first woman-on-paper gangbang.

Nah:

I'm all for it. After all, no living person can be on US currency, so let's make this happen!

[Flagg]

When the $20 is up for redesign again, I wonder how successful a campaign to show Jackson as a butcher would be. Have the $10 replaced by a woman as is currently being done, then replace the $20 with someone like Frederick Douglas, Martin Luther King, or a president who actually did something good like FDR or Eisenhower.

I'd like to point out that the greatest slave-owner in Georgia at the time of expulsion was a Cherokee. also, the Cherokee Slave Revolt.

The Five Civilized Tribes liked them some African Slavery.

I'd like to point out that you pointing that out seems to be some kind of veiled justification for ethnic cleansing. While slavery = evil, ethnic cleansing as a precursor to genocide = more evil. Plus, I bet the US took all their slaves away and sold them for a hefty profit considering it was, you know, still legal.

[Ziggy Stardust]

Plus, I bet the US took all their slaves away and sold them for a hefty profit considering it was, you know, still legal.

In all "fairness" (in whatever sense it is possible to use that word when talking about this), from what I can find doing a little Googling it actually seems that they did let the Cherokee (or at least the wealthiest ones) bring their slaves with them.

Of course, that same research has also been unable to backup whackadoodle's claim that a Cherokee was the "greatest slave-owner in Georgia at the time". Not that any of this even matters because it's idiotic as fuck for him to even bring it up at all. Hell, there were free black men that owned slaves during the same time period. It should not be at all surprising that individuals living in a society that legalizes (and, indeed, promotes) slavery would become involved with the slave trade in some way.