Not they won't, Two might, but not 10.
And it isn't just ten rifles, it's also the hundreds of round of ammo
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
Not they won't, Two might, but not 10.
Then helping him derail threads? You could also do a better job constructing arguments so they are less vulnerable to nitpickery.Flagg wrote: ↑2017-10-02 04:40pmYou only crawl out of the sewer to troll, so I don’t concern myself with your opinion of me. Frankly, you are funny as hell. Just like everyone else I laugh at you and every pathetic attempt at baiting me and others.Patroklos wrote: ↑2017-10-02 04:10pm If I bother to notice you at all Flagg it's to feel sad for you. You are so very sad.
Which doesn't excuse you from providing evidence for claims you have made (and no you did not do so in your response to Simon, you simply said another option was plausible). Do you have evidence that the weapons used were from a legal source?
Just rip off the bandage Flagg, then you can go back to dancing on the backs of the fallen as you are so fond of doing.
I, like almost everyone was speculating. The only sure fire argument I made was that any attempt at legislation to prevent another incident like this would be met with the hew and cry of the gun lobby.Alyrium Denryle wrote: ↑2017-10-02 04:47pmThen helping him derail threads? You could also do a better job constructing arguments so they are less vulnerable to nitpickery.Flagg wrote: ↑2017-10-02 04:40pmYou only crawl out of the sewer to troll, so I don’t concern myself with your opinion of me. Frankly, you are funny as hell. Just like everyone else I laugh at you and every pathetic attempt at baiting me and others.Patroklos wrote: ↑2017-10-02 04:10pm If I bother to notice you at all Flagg it's to feel sad for you. You are so very sad.
Which doesn't excuse you from providing evidence for claims you have made (and no you did not do so in your response to Simon, you simply said another option was plausible). Do you have evidence that the weapons used were from a legal source?
Just rip off the bandage Flagg, then you can go back to dancing on the backs of the fallen as you are so fond of doing.
I dunno, those old military issue green duffel bags are pretty roomy. If you're taking the magazine out and sticking them in, you *might* be able to fit four or five of the skinnier models in, jam the magazines in between the guns. AKs in particular aren't all that thick compared to AR-types thanks to being mostly flat and slab-sided. I had a duffel bag back in college that was around 40"long x 12"+ wide when fully packed and closed. That's (I think) probably big enough to fit multiple AKs and a few magazines.
Yeah, 10 rifles and at least one handgun were found in the hotel room, that's been consistent in the reports. He brought at least 11 guns to the massacre.
The measures are in place. It's illegal for civilians to own fully automatic weapons unless they have an FFL, which requires a fairly large sum of money, getting fingerprinted, being in a federal registry, have to report the tax stamp every year, and be subject to inspection at any given time. If this man had all of those, than it's a tragedy where the system failed. If he didn't have even one of them it means any measure wouldn't have stopped him anyway, since it's not like criminals respect laws.
He'd been staying in a really expensive suite for the last few days; square footage of like 1,000+ ft2; so nobody's going to notice that Mr. big shot high roller is rolling in with a decent amount of luggage; and if he did use ARMALYTES, you can remove the upper from the lower to reduce OAL to fit into suitcases.
We don’t actually know that he used fully automatic weapons, that’s conjecture at this point, or have you missed the rest of the back and forth on that measure in this thread? And since the gun lobby is flat out against any new legislation and is trying to roll back the legislation that exists (currently they are trying to roll back restrictions on suppressors aka “silencers”) I feel quite comfortable on my high ground and not at all like an idiot.Highlord Laan wrote: ↑2017-10-02 05:42pmThe measures are in place. It's illegal for civilians to own fully automatic weapons unless they have an FFL, which requires a fairly large sum of money, getting fingerprinted, being in a federal registry, have to report the tax stamp every year, and be subject to inspection at any given time. If this man had all of those, than it's a tragedy where the system failed. If he didn't have even one of them it means any measure wouldn't have stopped him anyway, since it's not like criminals respect laws.
But feel free to bitch and moan and pretend to be on a soapbox atop a hill of moral high ground if it makes you feel any better, you fucking idiot.
It doesn't really matter, as the size difference between 7.62x39 and 5.56 are not that great; and you can always remove the rear stock of a AK pattern rifle to reduce OAL for shipment -- it's just messier than with an ARMALYTE.
And to add: If the system failed then it’s clear that no private citizen should own fully automatic weapons. At least it is to me, someone who isn’t willing to see 58 (at last count) killed and over 400 (at last count) injured by one guy so that a few hundred (or thousand) people across the country can have toys to play with. And before you bring up the Oklahoma City Bombing, ammonium nitrate became tracked and regulated in an attempt to prevent it from happening again.Flagg wrote: ↑2017-10-02 06:19pmWe don’t actually know that he used fully automatic weapons, that’s conjecture at this point, or have you missed the rest of the back and forth on that measure in this thread? And since the gun lobby is flat out against any new legislation and is trying to roll back the legislation that exists (currently they are trying to roll back restrictions on suppressors aka “silencers”) I feel quite comfortable on my high ground and not at all like an idiot.Highlord Laan wrote: ↑2017-10-02 05:42pmThe measures are in place. It's illegal for civilians to own fully automatic weapons unless they have an FFL, which requires a fairly large sum of money, getting fingerprinted, being in a federal registry, have to report the tax stamp every year, and be subject to inspection at any given time. If this man had all of those, than it's a tragedy where the system failed. If he didn't have even one of them it means any measure wouldn't have stopped him anyway, since it's not like criminals respect laws.
But feel free to bitch and moan and pretend to be on a soapbox atop a hill of moral high ground if it makes you feel any better, you fucking idiot.
The case that decided the National Firearms Act basically said that if it's non military use, it can be regulated and controlled tightly, since it's not suitable for milita use.
While an interesting notion, would this permit fire fast enough to approximate the sound of an automatic?MKSheppard wrote: ↑2017-10-02 06:12pm This guy basically used common weapons as a poor-man's machine-gun; or if you will, indirect fire artillery.[snip]
The conjecture is based on several concert video recordings, where the gunfire heard is uninterrupted, constant, and consistent. This doesn't mean it was absolutely automatic weapon fire, but the current evidence at hand is leaning that way.Flagg wrote: ↑2017-10-02 06:19pm We don’t actually know that he used fully automatic weapons, that’s conjecture at this point, or have you missed the rest of the back and forth on that measure in this thread? And since the gun lobby is flat out against any new legislation and is trying to roll back the legislation that exists (currently they are trying to roll back restrictions on suppressors aka “silencers”) I feel quite comfortable on my high ground and not at all like an idiot.
Yeah, and I know it’s very strictly regulated out the ass and I doubt that this guy legally obtained a fully automatic weapon assuming fully automatic weapon(s) were used since we are still at the speculation stage.MKSheppard wrote: ↑2017-10-02 06:53pmThe case that decided the National Firearms Act basically said that if it's non military use, it can be regulated and controlled tightly, since it's not suitable for milita use.
Yes, I figured their were some "Indian wars" massacres that surpassed it.
The Pulse nightclub shooting last year was close, something like 50 people killed and a hundred or more injured. I expect many of the injuries in this case though came from stampeding and falls given the size of the crowd.The Romulan Republic wrote: ↑2017-10-02 07:48pmYes, I figured their were some "Indian wars" massacres that surpassed it.
But still, horrific, and unprecedented in modern history. The only things I can think of that really come close to this are major bombings/terrorist attacks, and even then, only Oklahoma City and 9/11 are on a comparable or greater scale.
Edit: Well, their were a few mass shootings with death tolls in the dozens that I can recall. But none with likely fully automatic weapons or several hundred injuries.
There probably were a bunch of injuries from that. Going by a statement from one of the performers at the concert, a lot of the injuries may have also been caused by shrapnel from bullets splintering.Elheru Aran wrote: ↑2017-10-02 07:51pmThe Pulse nightclub shooting last year was close, something like 50 people killed and a hundred or more injured. I expect many of the injuries in this case though came from stampeding and falls given the size of the crowd.
I’ve been a proponent of the 2nd amendment my entire life.
Until the events of last night. I cannot express how wrong I was. We actually have members of our crew with CHL licenses, and legal firearms on the bus.
They were useless.
We couldn’t touch them for fear police might think that we were part of the massacre and shoot us. A small group (or one man) laid waste to a city with dedicated, fearless police officers desperately trying to help, because of access to an insane amount of fire power.
Enough is enough.
Writing my parents and the love of my life a goodbye note last night and a living will because I felt like I wasn’t going to live through the night was enough for me to realize that this is completely and totally out of hand. These rounds were powerful enough that my crew guys just standing in close proximity of a victim shot by this fucking coward received shrapnel wounds.
We need gun control RIGHT. NOW.
My biggest regret is that I stubbornly didn’t realize it until my brothers on the road and myself were threatened by it.
We are unbelievably fortunate to not be among the victims killed or seriously wounded by this maniac.