It's okay. I agree with you totally. I think that there are useless degrees, or rather, degrees with such a narrow range of usefulness they might as well be useless. For example, my school offers BAs in Physics and Chemistry. It's exactly what you would think: a pitiful shadow of a real degree. Similarly, I can't help but feel wary about interdisciplinary and other build-a-degree programs, because, although they are a good idea in theory, in practice, how can an employer tell what the degree provided in way of skills to the prospective employee? Engineering, primary education and business degrees, and language to a lesser extent, as far as I'm aware, are some of the few bachelor's that have a large market associated with them. Even then, there is the shadow of the MBA for business graduates. Even secondary education requires that you work towards a master's if you come in with a bachelors. There are jobs available for people with bachelor's degrees, mainly lab technicians and research assistants for Biochem as in your, but in many cases the market is small enough that a recession will mean that even average numbers of graduates will oversaturate the market. In cases like English, where there are many, many more students than in any given science specialization...SancheztheWhaler wrote:Your point is well taken, and I was thinking along those lines during my earlier post. Someone who graduates with a Biochemistry Bachelors degree will have essentially no job prospects in that field (most public and private sector Biochem-related jobs require at least a Masters, preferably a Doctoral degree). So someone graduating with that degree and no further education has a "useless" degree.
More specifically, however, I am referring to the large numbers of college students graduating with Arts and Humanities (i.e., Liberal Arts) Degrees, with ridiculous debtloads (over $100k in some cases), who have no real job skills, and face the prospect of not being able to pay off their student loans any time soon. I know medical school loans can be insane, but at least a doctor or lawyer can pull down $100k, $200k, or more each year to (relatively) quickly pay off their $150K in student loans. A Philosophy major, on the other hand, is much less likely to be able to pay off their $150K in student loan debt, given that the jobs they're likely to be offered are either in education or some sort of menial office job, neither of which pays all that much.
EDIT - for what it's worth, I have no issue with someone receiving a Philosophy degree and paying or working their way through school. It's the people incurring ridiculous debt without any forethought and with no way of paying it off that irk me.
Looking at the College of Arts and Letters at my university, they contain the theater, art/art history, English, linguistics, languages, philosophy, religious studies, and the gen-ed writing departments. The usefulness of any of these is of course up to debate, but it is one of the smaller colleges in terms of departments and special programs.
I find it interesting that one of the preeminent philosophers at my university, Robert T. Pennock, himself received his BSc in the biological sciences. This has helped him, as he has published a number of works attacking creationism, but he was able to go from a biology degree to philosophy. In any case, it seems we primarily agree. As someone who is currently in college and trying to pay for it as much himself, I must say that I find the idea of people coasting through on debt irritating, not the least because they harm the ability of others to receive student loans (including myself, if necessary).