Gasoline inventories sink dangerously low

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
J
Kaye Elle Emenopey
Posts: 5837
Joined: 2002-12-14 02:23pm

Gasoline inventories sink dangerously low

Post by J »

The short summary: The US gasoline inventory situation is becoming critical, and there already spot shortages and emergency import measures in place in some areas.

Link
Peak Oil Crisis: Minimum Operating Levels Redux
Written by Tom Whipple
Thursday, 06 September 2007


Last spring, when U.S. gasoline stockpiles were falling like a brick, there was much concern about shortages during the summer driving season. The average price for gasoline in the U.S. rose to $3.22 per gallon and in some parts of the country over $4. Our aged refineries were huffing and puffing to increase gasoline output enough to meet demand which was approaching record highs.

But then something wonderful happened. Great ships appeared on the horizon, attracted by the record high U.S. gasoline prices, and soon there was enough gasoline so that we could all have a mobile summer. Those of us who worry about the possibility of oil and gasoline shortages forgot about U.S. stockpiles for awhile and went back to puzzling over OPEC pronouncements, Venezuela, Nigeria, Mexico and a dozen other topics that affect our oil supplies.

Late in May, however, before the gasoline bearing tankers started arriving in larger numbers, I wrote a column about the minimum operating level (MOL) for gasoline in the U.S. You may recall that the MOL is the amount of gasoline we have in inventory that is in transit and not readily available. It may be in a pipeline coming up from Louisiana, on a barge being towed along the coast or still at the refinery waiting to be shipped.

You may even recall that the U.S. Department of Energy used to publish a number for the minimum operating level, but then stopped on the grounds they were not sure exactly what the correct number was. There certainly was no need to scare people by suggesting we were getting close to the bottom of our national gasoline tank. Last May, however, an inveterate researcher discovered the number in a musty old DOE publication from 2004 and it turned out to be 185 million barrels.

Now this number is probably not exactly right. Others have placed it at 170 million, but the size is not really relevant; it is the general magnitude that counts. Why bring this up again? Well last May there was much excitement when the government reported that our national gasoline inventory had shrunk from 228 million barrels in January to 195 million in late May.

Now for the disturbing news: during June our national gasoline stockpile climbed to about 205 million barrels and held there through July. Then as prices fell throughout the summer, fewer and fewer great gasoline ships visited our shores and our stockpiles started dropping again. The last report from nearly two weeks ago places our gasoline inventory at 192.6 million barrels.

This may sound like a lot unless you that know as a nation we are burning in excess of 9.6 million barrels a day. If our minimum operating level really is somewhere in the vicinity of 185 million barrels, then we have about 18 hours of reserves left should there be a serious supply interruption – like from a hurricane.

Even if the MOL is 170 million barrels or less, we only have a few days of useable reserves left and these are not evenly distributed across the country.

Currently gasoline stocks in the Midwest are down to 45 million barrels – some 10 million less than last winter’s high and shortages have already developed in states that are at the end of the distribution pipelines. There have been spot shortages in North and South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa and Minnesota. North Dakota has been given permission to import gasoline from Canada that does not meet U.S. environmental standards. Nebraskan tanker drivers have been allowed to extend their driving hours so they can range further afield in search of supplies

So what is going to happen? The summer driving season is now over. Normally U.S. gasoline consumption drops by about 2 million barrels per week after Labor Day. This is the good news, and if there were no other considerations, a two million or so barrel per week drop in consumption might to enough to prevent spot shortages from spreading.

Consumption, however, is only half of the story. Wholesale gasoline prices currently are about 40 cents a gallon less than they were last May and do not reflect how tight the supply situation really is. In more normal times, with so little gasoline in stock and giant hurricanes forecast to come hurtling out of the Atlantic for another two months, one would expect to see gasoline traders in a bidding frenzy. But these are not normal times. A credit crisis is engulfing us. While some see a minor “re-pricing of assets”, others see a recession that will drive down world demand for oil.

The returns from the summer driving season won’t be in for another week. Surveys of traders forecast that our national gasoline stockpile dropped by another million or so barrels last week. If they are wrong and the drop is reported as being two or more million barrels we are starting to get into dangerous territory. If stockpiles continue dropping in September we are going to be testing just where the minimum operating level is --- the hard way.

Gasoline prices are temporarily lost in the angst of the credit crisis. But this too will end. Sometime in the next few months, some event is likely to set off a spike in gasoline prices. Be it a hurricane, terrorist attack, adverse geopolitical crisis or some credit crisis development, the realization will dawn that we are extremely short of gasoline and have little hope of remedying the situation over the short term. Then the troubles will begin.

Don’t overlook the possibility that someday soon there will be a run on the gas stations. A tank of gas is so important in America today that at the first reports of an impending gasoline shortage many of us will rush to fill our tanks. If we all did this at once, the national reserve would be drained by something on the order of 50 million barrels. A lot of us are sure to be disappointed because there simply is not enough gasoline in the system for this to happen.
From the latest DOE oil inventory report, the gasoline stockpiles have dropped again, and they're sitting at 191.1 million barrels as of the end of August 31. This number will almost certainly fall again once all the Labour Day driving is accounted for.

So we're looking at around 6 million barrels above the minimum operable levels for the system, that's only a bit more than half a day's worth of gasoline. This is, as I recall, just as low as the stock levels seen after the double-whammy caused by hurricanes Katrina and Rita two years ago.
This post is a 100% natural organic product.
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects


I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins


When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Post by MKSheppard »

Answer's obvious, kill all the god damn NIMBYs and build more refineries.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

MKSheppard wrote:Answer's obvious, kill all the god damn NIMBYs and build more refineries.
Cute theory, but what's not swamp or city is already wall-to-wall refineries here in Cajun Country. Honestly, this shit quite frankly scares me, and I'm living in an area known for easy access to petroleum and low gas prices.
Image Image
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Post by MKSheppard »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Cute theory, but what's not swamp or city is already wall-to-wall refineries here in Cajun Country.
And how many have been built since the 1960s-1970s?
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
J
Kaye Elle Emenopey
Posts: 5837
Joined: 2002-12-14 02:23pm

Post by J »

MKSheppard wrote:Answer's obvious, kill all the god damn NIMBYs and build more refineries.
Sure, but where's the oil going to come from? Crude oil stockpiles have fallen by nearly 25 million barrels in two months, going from near record highs to just a bit above average.
This post is a 100% natural organic product.
The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects


I'm not sure why people choose 'To Love is to Bury' as their wedding song...It's about a murder-suicide
- Margo Timmins


When it becomes serious, you have to lie
- Jean-Claude Juncker
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Not a lot. A global refinery glut is not what we're in. The costs of building them along with BANANAs (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) and the inkling these companies have that new ones wouldn't be running too long as crude runs low add to the fact that we're processing the expensive shit, rather than the cheap nice stuff. Unlike everything else in economics, with oil you get the good quality stuff easy and for pennies, while later on you have to deal with the heavy, sour crud that costs more to extract, is harder to process and doesn't even contain all that much energy.

I've been following the discussions and observations of the US gasoline network over on another board for some months now, and I had expected the STHTF as the driving season started. Fortunately, big imports from the UK and some others help to drive the machine, at the expense of me paying even more for my petroleum. Even nearing $4 in some areas, demand stayed high, which is unprecedented given in the '70s such price rises immediately cut demand.

Want to have a good few million barrels extra a year? Bring the CAFE standard up to at least 35 MPG or 8 litres/100 km and you can scrap all those damn SUVs.

By the way, 11 September is a bit of a crunch day in my calendar. OPEC has their annual meeting then. They're expected to keep output as it is, but everyone demands they sort this shit out and open the taps (faucets to you people). If they don't, which it's looking like, I believe the markets may get a little uneasy when they figure this is the shape of things to come and the swing producer we all know and love as The Kingdon, looks after its own and doesn't go splashing oil all over the place at their future's expense.
User avatar
Ma Deuce
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4359
Joined: 2004-02-02 03:22pm
Location: Whitby, Ontario

Post by Ma Deuce »

Want to have a good few million barrels extra a year? Bring the CAFE standard up to at least 35 MPG or 8 litres/100 km and you can scrap all those damn SUVs.
Why not just scrap CAFE and replace it with excise taxes on gasoline like everyone else does? CAFE doesn't work and never did.
Image
The M2HB: The Greatest Machinegun Ever Made.
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist


"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke

"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Ma Deuce wrote:
Want to have a good few million barrels extra a year? Bring the CAFE standard up to at least 35 MPG or 8 litres/100 km and you can scrap all those damn SUVs.
Why not just scrap CAFE and replace it with excise taxes on gasoline like everyone else does? CAFE doesn't work and never did.

A 55 mpg CAFE + a five dollar additional tax on each gallon of gasoline would do nicely for starters, actually... Also ban any vehicle that makes less than 18 mpg and doesn't require a CDL to operate, unless it is owned by someone in the agricultural sector.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

How important is it - politically - in America to keep petrol prices low? The idea that in this day and age the US doesn't have petrol taxes seems bizarre, particularly since they have the cheapest petrol prices I've ever heard of.
User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12797
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.

Post by Flagg »

Stark wrote:How important is it - politically - in America to keep petrol prices low? The idea that in this day and age the US doesn't have petrol taxes seems bizarre, particularly since they have the cheapest petrol prices I've ever heard of.
Looking at the state of our mass transit system... Pretty fucking important.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan

You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to
Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan

He who can,
does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

I said poltically, not practically. Raising the fuel prices an unspecified amount with taxes doesn't automatically throw millions of people into public transport.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Politically, it'd be like a worshipper of the donkey party having the secretary suck cock in the Oval Office. For the slow, that's classes as "suicide".
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Stark »

No shit. That's why I said 'how important'. If the situation is this bad, it's time to think about reducing use by jacking prices. If the US is anything like AU, even a few cents here and there would start to reduce usage, without some ridiculous 'oh noes everyone on teh trainz' overreaction.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Stark wrote:No shit. That's why I said 'how important'. If the situation is this bad, it's time to think about reducing use by jacking prices. If the US is anything like AU, even a few cents here and there would start to reduce usage, without some ridiculous 'oh noes everyone on teh trainz' overreaction.
'Cept, the price has gone up by dollars in well under a decade and demand has increased. A good rule of thumb is for every 15% rise in price, 1% drop in demand occurs (or should do). Another rule is, don't compare the US to any other country on Earth. It don't work, yo.
User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12797
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.

Post by Flagg »

Stark wrote:I said poltically, not practically. Raising the fuel prices an unspecified amount with taxes doesn't automatically throw millions of people into public transport.
I meant politically. Practically it would mean people have to buy more fuel efficient vehicles and plan trips better. Politically, the person enacting such things might as well rape a puppy on national TV while carving a pentagram into the left asscheek of a 9 year old boy.
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan

You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to
Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan

He who can,
does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Stark wrote:So your 'rule of thumb' says doubling price reduces usage by 6%? :lol:
Sounds about right to me, at least over historical price intervals. Do you have any experience or data to back up your inane animated gif's?
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Stark wrote:So your 'rule of thumb' says doubling price reduces usage by 6%? :lol:
No. It is a fact. The trend so far has proven it. Even if the price hit $8 a gallon, what are the people going to do? Not drive? Yeah right, I'm sure their perfectly optimal suburban living arrangements will allow that. They will pay the price, even if it means less holidays, eating out infrequently or buying less non-essential crap like iPods and Levis.

They have no other choice, and if they can't pay? The US economy goes into recession and likely depression. We have already seen that the hardest hit are the average wage earners, while everyone else just grumbles, but carries on regardless. Do you really think it's hitting them that hard if first quarter sales of SUVs in the US went up 7% this year? It's not like it's expensive for them, paying the cheapest gas prices in the Western world. Oh boo hoo, they may end up paying what I'm paying now within a decade. Forgive me if I don't break down inconsolably.
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Post by Starglider »

Stark wrote:So your 'rule of thumb' says doubling price reduces usage by 6%? :lol:
That's what 'inelastic demand' means.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28846
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

Stark wrote:How important is it - politically - in America to keep petrol prices low? The idea that in this day and age the US doesn't have petrol taxes seems bizarre, particularly since they have the cheapest petrol prices I've ever heard of.
We DO have taxes on petrol, they're just a hell of a lot lower than everyone else's taxes on same.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Post by CmdrWilkens »

Broomstick wrote:
Stark wrote:How important is it - politically - in America to keep petrol prices low? The idea that in this day and age the US doesn't have petrol taxes seems bizarre, particularly since they have the cheapest petrol prices I've ever heard of.
We DO have taxes on petrol, they're just a hell of a lot lower than everyone else's taxes on same.
According to the Energy Information Agency the Federal tax on unleaded is $.184/gal and the average state tax is $.213 per gallon ranging from a low of $.075 in Georgia to a high of $.34 in Washington state. So incredibly low but they are still there.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Post by McC »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote: A 55 mpg CAFE + a five dollar additional tax on each gallon of gasoline would do nicely for starters, actually... Also ban any vehicle that makes less than 18 mpg and doesn't require a CDL to operate, unless it is owned by someone in the agricultural sector.
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't a 55 MPG CAFE pretty much impossible right now? Only the newest of the new cars can obtain such high gas mileage as far as I know, and even then they tend to be non-traditional vehicles (hybrids and the like).

Further, banning vehicles that run at less than 18 MPG would ban most vehicles on the road today. While this may be a lovely notion, it's hideously impractical. The average mileage of U.S. vehicles is 17 MPG (I can't find an official source to corroborate this, however). Considering the sheer number of vehicles that need to fall below the average for it to be so low, you've suddenly declared that a lot of people cannot drive, and must purchase new vehicles. While, again, this may be a lovely notion -- it'll never, ever happen.

Another specter is that of the commute duration. An engine/vehicle capable of 55 MPG without using electrical hybridization of some kind, is still capable of getting completely lousy mileage if the commute has a great deal of stopping involved.
DailyFuelEconomy wrote:From 1990 to 2000, the average commute time grew from 22.4 minutes to 25.5 minutes, an increase of a little over 12%. It also appears that the number of people who wish they [only] had to commute 25 minutes...has also drastically increased, as the number of people with an hour or longer commute grew over 50% from 1990 to 2000.
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
aerius
Charismatic Cult Leader
Posts: 14804
Joined: 2002-08-18 07:27pm

Post by aerius »

McC wrote:Forgive my ignorance, but isn't a 55 MPG CAFE pretty much impossible right now? Only the newest of the new cars can obtain such high gas mileage as far as I know, and even then they tend to be non-traditional vehicles (hybrids and the like).
Lots of cars in Europe can meet a 55 MPG target, hell the Big 3's European brands already make them. Same thing with Japanese companies, a lot of the cars for their domestic market will do 55 MPG or better. All we gotta do is retool our manufacturing plants to make the damn things.
Further, banning vehicles that run at less than 18 MPG would ban most vehicles on the road today. While this may be a lovely notion, it's hideously impractical. The average mileage of U.S. vehicles is 17 MPG (I can't find an official source to corroborate this, however). Considering the sheer number of vehicles that need to fall below the average for it to be so low, you've suddenly declared that a lot of people cannot drive, and must purchase new vehicles. While, again, this may be a lovely notion -- it'll never, ever happen.
It'll take damn near every SUV and pickup truck off the roads, along with a fair number of luxury & sports cars. Practically every family car I can think of, even Mike's old Grand Marquis land yacht will meet an 18 MPG minimum.

You're right that it'll probably never happen though, at least until the big crunch comes and gasoline starts selling for $10-20 a gallon, by which time it'll be too late.
Another specter is that of the commute duration. An engine/vehicle capable of 55 MPG without using electrical hybridization of some kind, is still capable of getting completely lousy mileage if the commute has a great deal of stopping involved.
True, though you can kinda get around that by using diesels with an automatic engine shutoff. Diesels through their lack of a throttle and abundant torque are more efficient than gasoline engines in city driving, and an automatic engine shutoff can improve that even more. Still not as good as a hybrid, but a lot better than gasoline.
Image
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me. :)
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either. :P
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Post by McC »

aerius wrote:Lots of cars in Europe can meet a 55 MPG target, hell the Big 3's European brands already make them. Same thing with Japanese companies, a lot of the cars for their domestic market will do 55 MPG or better. All we gotta do is retool our manufacturing plants to make the damn things.
So it's just a manufacturing standard, rather than a technological one?

Why is there a disconnect between manufacturing standards for U.S. car distribution and European/Japanese distribution? :? Isn't that more expensive for the car companies? Or have I misunderstood?
It'll take damn near every SUV and pickup truck off the roads, along with a fair number of luxury & sports cars. Practically every family car I can think of, even Mike's old Grand Marquis land yacht will meet an 18 MPG minimum.

You're right that it'll probably never happen though, at least until the big crunch comes and gasoline starts selling for $10-20 a gallon, by which time it'll be too late.
Right, so, not going to happen. ;)

On a personal note, and please forgive the rant, it always bugs me when the Peak Oil and similar threads come up, because people are all too happy to doomsay and provide completely unrealistic "solutions," without actually trying to suggest how things could feasibly get better. "Ban all cars under 18 MPG" may solve the problem, but you can't implement it without huge public outcry (not to mention the issue of actually enforcing it), so why even bother suggesting it? (Obviously, you didn't suggest it; nor am I attempting to attack Duchess -- it's just sort of a generalized question)
True, though you can kinda get around that by using diesels with an automatic engine shutoff. Diesels through their lack of a throttle and abundant torque are more efficient than gasoline engines in city driving, and an automatic engine shutoff can improve that even more. Still not as good as a hybrid, but a lot better than gasoline.
Doesn't the on/off of the engine introduce a lot more engine wear? This is something I've often wondered about, stuck in traffic -- does it make more sense to just shut off my car at a stop light, and turn it on when the light turns green, or would that be bad for the health of the car parts in the long term?
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

aerius wrote:It'll take damn near every SUV and pickup truck off the roads, along with a fair number of luxury & sports cars. Practically every family car I can think of, even Mike's old Grand Marquis land yacht will meet an 18 MPG minimum.
Two things to note here:

1) Historically, CAFE standards have applied to new car sales. They are not retroactively applied to old cars. So sharply increased CAFE standards would not take existing cars off the road.

2) I got rid of the land yacht last year. I drive a 4-cylinder Subaru now.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Post Reply