Upset about election coverage

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply

Does the Media Push it's Bias onto Society?

Yes
18
90%
No
2
10%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
Kodiak
Jedi Master
Posts: 1400
Joined: 2005-07-08 02:19pm
Location: The City in the Country

Upset about election coverage

Post by Kodiak »

I write about pop culture for a magazine that deals with American entertainment. Does a presidential campaign belong in a column like that, for a magazine like this? Two months ago, I would have said no. But then came Oprah Winfrey's decision to actively campaign for Barack Obama. And the writers' strike. And the completely wrong polls preceding the New Hampshire Democratic primary, and the news media's subsequent caution in quoting polls since then.

The tipping point came somewhere in Georgia, on my annual drive from Maine to Florida; I was listening to a country station. The DJ spun Alan Jackson's new single, ''Small Town Southern Man,'' and when it was over he said it belonged to a new musical genre: Huckabilly. Sitting there in my car as I-95 unrolled in front of me, I thought: Something's going on here.

Indeed there is. The presidency has gone pop-cult. And to a large extent I blame the WGA.

Are TV viewers' habits changing because of the writers' strike? Many reporters who cover entertainment — some at this very periodical — think they are, and that if the strike doesn't end soon, the changes will accelerate. One change they've noted is the ever larger number of TV watchers who are tuning in to coverage of the campaign (which already feels four centuries old). The switch is partly because scripted TV episodes are in increasingly short supply, but it's also because...damn, people are just interested. If anything has come clear in the last few months, it's that citizens are tired of the Bush & Cheney Show. They want someone new. Almost anybody, it seems.

Programmers at cable nets like CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News may have been born at night, but it wasn't last night, and they're not stupid. They've jumped on the bandwagon and produced a constant din of political palaver. Most is generated by the motormouths my friend The Longhair calls ''the White Guys in Ties Brigade.'' But it's not all Pat Buchanan and Chris Matthews; there are also real stars! OMG!!

2008 has become the political equivalent of Celebrity Match Game. Huckabee fans include Ted ''I Never Saw a Gun I Didn't Like'' Nugent and Chuck Norris, he of the scary teeth. Hillary Clinton's got Barbra Streisand. John Edwards is running on empty with Jackson Browne. Rudy Giuliani has got...er, Bo Derek? Romney is trailing the field, celeb-wise, but still trying with Donny Osmond. And even Fred Thompson had a pet celeb: Pat Sajak! (I was hoping my guy Obama would get Sajak, but disappointment is a part of politics.)

Yet glitz alone isn't enough; as some wise fellow (it might have been Yoda) once pointed out, ''One monkey don't stop no show.'' This is hard to believe, but surveys suggest over half the American electorate doesn't seem to care who Wilford Brimley supports (answer: John McCain). Even Oprah's no guarantee: While I'm sure she's helped, she couldn't bring the funk in New Hampshire and Nevada.

Not a problem, though. The response of the media covering the races has been to dumb them down to a giddy but politically inane reality show: Call it The Great Presidency Race or American Political Idol. They even had Dennis Kucinich to play the part of Sanjaya Malakar. Isn't that wonderful for them.

Or call it White House Survivor, with Tim Russert subbing for Jeff Probst. Every primary brings a new immunity challenge, and the winners get a dose of that mystic thing called ''momentum.'' One by one the field is winnowed down until our new champ can be crowned in November. Do the candidates' programs and promises count? A little, but what really plays is Hillary misting up and Mike Huckabee plucking his bass guitar. Is it beyond belief that come November we might hear, ''Election Night '08! Brought to you by Budweiser — please vote responsibly''? Probably it is. But if American Political Idol continues to grow in popularity, it might be only a matter of time. Think of the possibilities! Slo-mo replays of the latest candidate meltdown, brought to you by Chevrolet!

I don't like this. Maybe I'm an old fogy, but turning the election process into a game show makes me depressed about the present and nervous about the future. One possibly good sign: Hip TV watchers have grown increasingly foxy about the polling process. The age of innocence is over; voters once willing to come clean and say they voted for Mike Huckabee because Nugent's ''Cat Scratch Fever'' loincloth is still the high point of their rock lives are harder and harder to find.

Can I be blunt? I think a lot of voters now lie right through their teeth when speaking to pollsters. And that might be the most optimistic trend in an election year where the coverage has never been dumber or more dubious. Because, dig, American voters seem to have realized that once they go into the voting booth and pull the curtain closed, they're on their own. No cameras, no celebs, no immunity challenges. Only them and the lever. Which I think is the way it's supposed to be. Of course, that's just my opinion.

We welcome yours.
article here

Perhaps this qualifies to go into the "Venting" thread, and if so the mods can move it there.

I find it infuriating that the "News" media seems to have already weighed in on much of the election and is waiting for the American people to catch up. In flipping through news, I find the overwhelming opinion that McCain is poised to take the primaries only then to see that in nearly every poll he and Romney are only separated by margins which can be the fault of statistics. Nowhere is there ANY coverage of Ron Paul and his campaign, or Mike Huckabee's for that matter (other than words between he and Romney).

On the democratic side, the only people I hear talking about race and gender are the news persons when they attempt to manufacture conflict. Not the candidates, not people I talk to, and not even other posters I see on msg boards. Why is the media trying to make news into scandal?

Does the media still have a responsibility to report news to the American people about what's going on, or has the media become a "special interest group" that simply picks whichever candidate will make their jobs easier? Has society sunk to such a level that we can no longer be interested in news unless someone's suffering humiliation, bigotry, or a victim? I really hope that the WGA strike ends soon so my news can get back to normal.
Image PRFYNAFBTFCP
Captain of the MFS Frigate of Pizazz +2 vs. Douchebags - Est vicis pro nonnullus suscito vir

"Are you an idiot? What demand do you think there is for aircraft carriers that aren't government?" - Captain Chewbacca

"I keep my eighteen wives in wonderfully appointed villas by bringing the underwear of god to the heathens. They will come to know God through well protected goodies." - Gandalf

"There is no such thing as being too righteous to understand." - Darth Wong
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Umm, what makes you or the writer of this article think this is anything new? Hell, Bill Clinton's campaign was defined by a blowjob, as if that was the most important thing that happened during 8 years of his presidency. Why? Because the media knows that sells papers.

But blaming the media is too easy, for the media only sells us what we want. Ultimately, the blame lies with us, the public, for wanting this bullshit, and supporting this kind of shit programming.

The fact is that the ordinary person is nowhere near qualified to understand most of the issues that will face a president. So they try to skim through all of the information about a president until they find something they can understand, like "does he hate gays as much as I do" or "did he cheat on his wife" or "does he talk like a good down-home small-town boy or one of those evil big-city slickers with them fancy dictionaries". And the media is simply responding to that kind of lowest-common-denominator voter mentality.

The media does not "push its bias onto society"; it simply reflects society's lowest common denominator.
Last edited by Darth Wong on 2008-02-04 05:14pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Post by Stravo »

To go along with Mike's point on the blame being our fault as well, news channels and other media sources are always quick to point out that historically, whenever they have done "serious" news pieces those never ever sell as well as the sensational or dumbed down stuff. We obviously eat up the very shot we complain about. So I'd say for us to be bitching about it is as hypocritical as bitching about high gas prices and then wondering why we're so involved in the Middle East.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
User avatar
Kodiak
Jedi Master
Posts: 1400
Joined: 2005-07-08 02:19pm
Location: The City in the Country

Post by Kodiak »

Darth Wong wrote: The media does not "push its bias onto society"; it simply reflects society's lowest common denominator.
So, you're saying that the media puts out BS and nonsense because that's what the American people understand? I fear you are correct. Then my question is, where can one actually find NEW about what the candidates believe? I've been to several of their websites, but it seems like what I need are some of those handy little pamphlets that I get before state elections that explain all the issues. Is there a "News for Not-Dummies" website out there?
Image PRFYNAFBTFCP
Captain of the MFS Frigate of Pizazz +2 vs. Douchebags - Est vicis pro nonnullus suscito vir

"Are you an idiot? What demand do you think there is for aircraft carriers that aren't government?" - Captain Chewbacca

"I keep my eighteen wives in wonderfully appointed villas by bringing the underwear of god to the heathens. They will come to know God through well protected goodies." - Gandalf

"There is no such thing as being too righteous to understand." - Darth Wong
User avatar
Keevan_Colton
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10355
Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
Contact:

Post by Keevan_Colton »

Kodiak wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: The media does not "push its bias onto society"; it simply reflects society's lowest common denominator.
So, you're saying that the media puts out BS and nonsense because that's what the American people understand? I fear you are correct. Then my question is, where can one actually find NEW about what the candidates believe? I've been to several of their websites, but it seems like what I need are some of those handy little pamphlets that I get before state elections that explain all the issues. Is there a "News for Not-Dummies" website out there?
http://www.bbc.co.uk
"Prodesse Non Nocere."
"It's all about popularity really, if your invisible friend that tells you to invade places is called Napoleon, you're a loony, if he's called Jesus then you're the president."
"I'd drive more people insane, but I'd have to double back and pick them up first..."
"All it takes for bullshit to thrive is for rational men to do nothing." - Kevin Farrell, B.A. Journalism.
BOTM - EBC - Horseman - G&C - Vampire
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Post by Glocksman »

Kodiak wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: The media does not "push its bias onto society"; it simply reflects society's lowest common denominator.
So, you're saying that the media puts out BS and nonsense because that's what the American people understand? I fear you are correct. Then my question is, where can one actually find NEW about what the candidates believe? I've been to several of their websites, but it seems like what I need are some of those handy little pamphlets that I get before state elections that explain all the issues. Is there a "News for Not-Dummies" website out there?
Going along with Mike and Stravo, that kind of information is fairly easy to find on the web and in print media, but you do have to look.
Real Clear Politics is a good starting point on the web for in-depth coverage of the issues.

TV news's strength is covering 'breaking' stories, not hours long in depth examination of an issue because of the 'lowest common denominator' factor Mike mentioned and the need for ratings.
Though there are CSPAN and CSPAN2 for the serious political junkies among us.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
Post Reply