Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by The Original Nex »

Only the transcript is available currently. This was recorded today at the White House.

Transcript courtesy of Politico.
INTERVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT

BY HISHAM MELHEM, AL ARABIYA

Map Room

5:46 P.M. EST

Q Mr. President, thank you for this opportunity, we really appreciate it.


THE PRESIDENT: Thank you so much.


Q Sir, you just met with your personal envoy to the Middle East, Senator Mitchell. Obviously, his first task is to consolidate the cease-fire. But beyond that you've been saying that you want to pursue actively and aggressively peacemaking between the Palestinians and the Israelis. Tell us a little bit about how do you see your personal role, because, you know, if the President of the United States is not involved, nothing happens -- as the history of peacemaking shows. Will you be proposing ideas, pitching proposals, parameters, as one of your predecessors did? Or just urging the parties to come up with their own resolutions, as your immediate predecessor did?


THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think the most important thing is for the United States to get engaged right away. And George Mitchell is somebody of enormous stature. He is one of the few people who have international experience brokering peace deals.

And so what I told him is start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating -- in the past on some of these issues -- and we don't always know all the factors that are involved. So let's listen. He's going to be speaking to all the major parties involved. And he will then report back to me. From there we will formulate a specific response.

Ultimately, we cannot tell either the Israelis or the Palestinians what's best for them. They're going to have to make some decisions. But I do believe that the moment is ripe for both sides to realize that the path that they are on is one that is not going to result in prosperity and security for their people. And that instead, it's time to return to the negotiating table.

And it's going to be difficult, it's going to take time. I don't want to prejudge many of these issues, and I want to make sure that expectations are not raised so that we think that this is going to be resolved in a few months. But if we start the steady progress on these issues, I'm absolutely confident that the United States -- working in tandem with the European Union, with Russia, with all the Arab states in the region -- I'm absolutely certain that we can make significant progress.


Q You've been saying essentially that we should not look at these issues -- like the Palestinian-Israeli track and separation from the border region -- you've been talking about a kind of holistic approach to the region. Are we expecting a different paradigm in the sense that in the past one of the critiques -- at least from the Arab side, the Muslim side -- is that everything the Americans always tested with the Israelis, if it works. Now there is an Arab peace plan, there is a regional aspect to it. And you've indicated that. Would there be any shift, a paradigm shift?


THE PRESIDENT: Well, here's what I think is important. Look at the proposal that was put forth by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia --


Q Right.


THE PRESIDENT: I might not agree with every aspect of the proposal, but it took great courage --


Q Absolutely.


THE PRESIDENT: -- to put forward something that is as significant as that. I think that there are ideas across the region of how we might pursue peace.

I do think that it is impossible for us to think only in terms of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and not think in terms of what's happening with Syria or Iran or Lebanon or Afghanistan and Pakistan. These things are interrelated. And what I've said, and I think Hillary Clinton has expressed this in her confirmation, is that if we are looking at the region as a whole and communicating a message to the Arab world and the Muslim world, that we are ready to initiate a new partnership based on mutual respect and mutual interest, then I think that we can make significant progress.

Now, Israel is a strong ally of the United States. They will not stop being a strong ally of the United States. And I will continue to believe that Israel's security is paramount. But I also believe that there are Israelis who recognize that it is important to achieve peace. They will be willing to make sacrifices if the time is appropriate and if there is serious partnership on the other side.

And so what we want to do is to listen, set aside some of the preconceptions that have existed and have built up over the last several years. And I think if we do that, then there's a possibility at least of achieving some breakthroughs.


Q I want to ask you about the broader Muslim world, but let me -- one final thing about the Palestinian-Israeli theater. There are many Palestinians and Israelis who are very frustrated now with the current conditions and they are losing hope, they are disillusioned, and they believe that time is running out on the two-state solution because -- mainly because of the settlement activities in Palestinian-occupied territories. Will it still be possible to see a Palestinian state -- and you know the contours of it -- within the first Obama administration?


THE PRESIDENT: I think it is possible for us to see a Palestinian state -- I'm not going to put a time frame on it -- that is contiguous, that allows freedom of movement for its people, that allows for trade with other countries, that allows the creation of businesses and commerce so that people have a better life.

And, look, I think anybody who has studied the region recognizes that the situation for the ordinary Palestinian in many cases has not improved. And the bottom line in all these talks and all these conversations is, is a child in the Palestinian Territories going to be better off? Do they have a future for themselves? And is the child in Israel going to feel confident about his or her safety and security? And if we can keep our focus on making their lives better and look forward, and not simply think about all the conflicts and tragedies of the past, then I think that we have an opportunity to make real progress.

But it is not going to be easy, and that's why we've got George Mitchell going there. This is somebody with extraordinary patience as well as extraordinary skill, and that's what's going to be necessary.


Q Absolutely. Let me take a broader look at the whole region. You are planning to address the Muslim world in your first 100 days from a Muslim capital. And everybody is speculating about the capital. (Laughter.) If you have anything further, that would be great.

How concerned are you -- because, let me tell you, honestly, when I see certain things about America -- in some parts, I don't want to exaggerate -- there is a demonization of America.


THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely.


Q It's become like a new religion, and like a new religion it has new converts -- like a new religion has its own high priests.


THE PRESIDENT: Right.


Q It's only a religious text.


THE PRESIDENT: Right.


Q And in the last -- since 9/11 and because of Iraq, that alienation is wider between the Americans and -- and in generations past, the United States was held high. It was the only Western power with no colonial legacy.


THE PRESIDENT: Right.


Q How concerned are you and -- because people sense that you have a different political discourse. And I think, judging by (inaudible) and Zawahiri and Osama bin Laden and all these, you know -- a chorus --


THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I noticed this. They seem nervous.


Q They seem very nervous, exactly. Now, tell me why they should be more nervous?


THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think that when you look at the rhetoric that they've been using against me before I even took office --


Q I know, I know.


THE PRESIDENT: -- what that tells me is that their ideas are bankrupt. There's no actions that they've taken that say a child in the Muslim world is getting a better education because of them, or has better health care because of them.

In my inauguration speech, I spoke about: You will be judged on what you've built, not what you've destroyed. And what they've been doing is destroying things. And over time, I think the Muslim world has recognized that that path is leading no place, except more death and destruction.

Now, my job is to communicate the fact that the United States has a stake in the well-being of the Muslim world, that the language we use has to be a language of respect. I have Muslim members of my family. I have lived in Muslim countries.


Q The largest one.


THE PRESIDENT: The largest one, Indonesia. And so what I want to communicate is the fact that in all my travels throughout the Muslim world, what I've come to understand is that regardless of your faith -- and America is a country of Muslims, Jews, Christians, non-believers -- regardless of your faith, people all have certain common hopes and common dreams.

And my job is to communicate to the American people that the Muslim world is filled with extraordinary people who simply want to live their lives and see their children live better lives. My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect. But if you look at the track record, as you say, America was not born as a colonial power, and that the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there's no reason why we can't restore that. And that I think is going to be an important task.

But ultimately, people are going to judge me not by my words but by my actions and my administration's actions. And I think that what you will see over the next several years is that I'm not going to agree with everything that some Muslim leader may say, or what's on a television station in the Arab world -- but I think that what you'll see is somebody who is listening, who is respectful, and who is trying to promote the interests not just of the United States, but also ordinary people who right now are suffering from poverty and a lack of opportunity. I want to make sure that I'm speaking to them, as well.


Q Tell me, time is running out, any decision on from where you will be visiting the Muslim world?


THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm not going to break the news right here.


Q Afghanistan?


THE PRESIDENT: But maybe next time. But it is something that is going to be important. I want people to recognize, though, that we are going to be making a series of initiatives. Sending George Mitchell to the Middle East is fulfilling my campaign promise that we're not going to wait until the end of my administration to deal with Palestinian and Israeli peace, we're going to start now. It may take a long time to do, but we're going to do it now. We're going to follow through on our commitment for me to address the Muslim world from a Muslim capital. We are going to follow through on many of my commitments to do a more effective job of reaching out, listening, as well as speaking to the Muslim world.

And you're going to see me following through with dealing with a drawdown of troops in Iraq, so that Iraqis can start taking more responsibility. And finally, I think you've already seen a commitment, in terms of closing Guantanamo, and making clear that even as we are decisive in going after terrorist organizations that would kill innocent civilians, that we're going to do so on our terms, and we're going to do so respecting the rule of law that I think makes America great.


Q President Bush framed the war on terror conceptually in a way that was very broad, "war on terror," and used sometimes certain terminology that the many people -- Islamic fascism. You've always framed it in a different way, specifically against one group called al Qaeda and their collaborators. And is this one way of --


THE PRESIDENT: I think that you're making a very important point. And that is that the language we use matters. And what we need to understand is, is that there are extremist organizations -- whether Muslim or any other faith in the past -- that will use faith as a justification for violence. We cannot paint with a broad brush a faith as a consequence of the violence that is done in that faith's name.

And so you will I think see our administration be very clear in distinguishing between organizations like al Qaeda -- that espouse violence, espouse terror and act on it -- and people who may disagree with my administration and certain actions, or may have a particular viewpoint in terms of how their countries should develop. We can have legitimate disagreements but still be respectful. I cannot respect terrorist organizations that would kill innocent civilians and we will hunt them down.

But to the broader Muslim world what we are going to be offering is a hand of friendship.


Q Can I end with a question on Iran and Iraq then quickly?


THE PRESIDENT: It's up to the team --


MR. GIBBS: You have 30 seconds. (Laughter.)


Q Will the United States ever live with a nuclear Iran? And if not, how far are you going in the direction of preventing it?


THE PRESIDENT: You know, I said during the campaign that it is very important for us to make sure that we are using all the tools of U.S. power, including diplomacy, in our relationship with Iran.

Now, the Iranian people are a great people, and Persian civilization is a great civilization. Iran has acted in ways that's not conducive to peace and prosperity in the region: their threats against Israel; their pursuit of a nuclear weapon which could potentially set off an arms race in the region that would make everybody less safe; their support of terrorist organizations in the past -- none of these things have been helpful.

But I do think that it is important for us to be willing to talk to Iran, to express very clearly where our differences are, but where there are potential avenues for progress. And we will over the next several months be laying out our general framework and approach. And as I said during my inauguration speech, if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us.


Q Shall we leave Iraq next interview, or just --


MR. GIBBS: Yes, let's -- we're past, and I got to get him back to dinner with his wife.


Q Sir, I really appreciate it.


THE PRESIDENT: Thank you so much.


Q Thanks a lot.


THE PRESIDENT: I appreciate it.


Q Thank you.


THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

END 6:03 P.M. EST
This will be broadcast to the Muslim world. Things like this do more harm to Al-qaeda than a bombing campaign ever could.
User avatar
hongi
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1952
Joined: 2006-10-15 02:14am
Location: Sydney

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by hongi »

Q Will the United States ever live with a nuclear Iran? And if not, how far are you going in the direction of preventing it?
That's a blinder of a question, one that Obama side-stepped.
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Has George W. Bush ever articulated anything even one fourths as coherent and compelling as that?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by FSTargetDrone »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:Has George W. Bush ever articulated anything even one fourths as coherent and compelling as that?
And I wonder if Bush has ever said "non-believers" in any public statement during his terms?
Obama wrote:And so what I want to communicate is the fact that in all my travels throughout the Muslim world, what I've come to understand is that regardless of your faith -- and America is a country of Muslims, Jews, Christians, non-believers -- regardless of your faith, people all have certain common hopes and common dreams.
I believe this is the second time Obama has said "non-believers" in his presidency, the first time during the inaugural.
Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Ender »

FSTargetDrone wrote:
Shroom Man 777 wrote:Has George W. Bush ever articulated anything even one fourths as coherent and compelling as that?
And I wonder if Bush has ever said "non-believers" in any public statement during his terms?
HW Bush declared that atheists were not Americans. Does that count?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by FSTargetDrone »

Ender wrote:HW Bush declared that atheists were not Americans. Does that count?
Heh. I suspect George the Lesser would have been advised by some functionary to never utter "non-believers," a nice, inoffensive, neutral term that doubtless would go over poorly with his base.
Image
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22466
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Mr Bean »

Shroom Man 777 wrote:Has George W. Bush ever articulated anything even one fourths as coherent and compelling as that?
Outside of Stuart's Armageddon??
No

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Justforfun000
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2503
Joined: 2002-08-19 01:44pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Justforfun000 »

That was excellent. Honestly, everytime I read an interview or hear a speech by that man I nearly tear up with blissful happiness that he's actually the President now. We...(well the States but Canadians still think of the US as family..)finally have a truly intelligent and well spoken leader that won't do more harm than good everytime he opens his mouth.

I was a little concerned about his sidestepping of the Iran question too. Although on the optimistic side of things, this very subtle yet possible permissive musing on the subject might stop Iran from immediate rhetoric that would poison the well before they've begun. Maybe this was actually somewhat calculated....With Obama you could never be sure. He's truly a bright cookie... :mrgreen:

I was doing some very light skimming on nuclear power and just the barest glimmer of understanding of the energy potential makes it a very tough issue. I never realized HOW much power is available in comparison to typical means. As quoted in some of the literature:

The amount of free energy contained in nuclear fuel is millions of times the amount of free energy contained in a similar mass of chemical fuel such as gasoline, making nuclear fission a very tempting source of energy;

Since this is the case it's a difficult argument to tell countries "Well WE can use this wonderfully rich technology for purely peaceful purposes of energy supply, but YOU?? NEVER. You're too untrustworthy and might build a bomb."

That's a really tough stance to morally hold forever even if it could be true. It's also so difficult to keep this attitude when places like Pakistan and India have such weapons. If it was only the States and Russia in the main, I could see it being a little easier to dictate...

What are the options here? Is there any reasonable way to allow countries to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes and yet be able to monitor them so they cannot divert it to any nefarious purposes? I'm simply too uninformed about the subject to grasp all the ramifications here..
You have to realize that most Christian "moral values" behaviour is not really about "protecting" anyone; it's about their desire to send a continual stream of messages of condemnation towards people whose existence offends them. - Darth Wong alias Mike Wong

"There is nothing wrong with being ignorant. However, there is something very wrong with not choosing to exchange ignorance for knowledge when the opportunity presents itself."
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Mr Bean wrote:
Shroom Man 777 wrote:Has George W. Bush ever articulated anything even one fourths as coherent and compelling as that?
Outside of Stuart's Armageddon??
No
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: That was great. [tip of the hat]
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Kanastrous »

Justforfun000 wrote: What are the options here? Is there any reasonable way to allow countries to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes and yet be able to monitor them so they cannot divert it to any nefarious purposes? I'm simply too uninformed about the subject to grasp all the ramifications here..
Let them have the powerplants but not the infrastructure for making or reprocessing the fuel; keep the outside-the-vessel parts of the fuel cycle under outside control.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7956
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by ray245 »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Mr Bean wrote:
Shroom Man 777 wrote:Has George W. Bush ever articulated anything even one fourths as coherent and compelling as that?
Outside of Stuart's Armageddon??
No
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: That was great. [tip of the hat]
Which reminds me, how will an Obama presidency looks like if he is elected in Stuart's story?
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Kanastrous »

Very short.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Ted C »

Justforfun000 wrote:What are the options here? Is there any reasonable way to allow countries to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes and yet be able to monitor them so they cannot divert it to any nefarious purposes? I'm simply too uninformed about the subject to grasp all the ramifications here..
Well, there are CANDU style reactors that don't require enriched fuel, so that's a start. No enrichment means no weapons-grade uranium. Plutonium is a by product of CANDU reactors, but I think that would require enrichment to become weapons-grade, so I don't think it's an issue. Bottom line: if you're really interested in peaceful atomic energy, you don't need a bunch of centrifuges.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Ted C wrote:
Justforfun000 wrote:What are the options here? Is there any reasonable way to allow countries to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes and yet be able to monitor them so they cannot divert it to any nefarious purposes? I'm simply too uninformed about the subject to grasp all the ramifications here..
Well, there are CANDU style reactors that don't require enriched fuel, so that's a start. No enrichment means no weapons-grade uranium. Plutonium is a by product of CANDU reactors, but I think that would require enrichment to become weapons-grade, so I don't think it's an issue. Bottom line: if you're really interested in peaceful atomic energy, you don't need a bunch of centrifuges.
Right, but how many countries will really subordinate their economic and energy sovereignty of the "Grown Ups" club just based on their say-so? This is an extreme amount of dependence on other nations.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Kanastrous »

Beats being embargoed, undermined, or bombed by the Grown-Ups Club.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
The Grim Squeaker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10319
Joined: 2005-06-01 01:44am
Location: A different time-space Continuum
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by The Grim Squeaker »

Kanastrous wrote:Beats being embargoed, undermined, or bombed by the Grown-Ups Club.
Like happened to North Korea after they declared that they had nuclear arms? Oh, wait, the world didn't do shit after that point.
Yup, there's no reason for any nation to assume that going "We have nukes now, so fuck off" won't result in an immediate forceful global response :roll:
Photography
Genius is always allowed some leeway, once the hammer has been pried from its hands and the blood has been cleaned up.
To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
Lord of the Abyss
Village Idiot
Posts: 4046
Joined: 2005-06-15 12:21am
Location: The Abyss

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Lord of the Abyss »

Kanastrous wrote:Beats being embargoed, undermined, or bombed by the Grown-Ups Club.
Except that with Iraq we've demonstrated that we'll do that anyway.
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Kanastrous »

DEATH wrote:
Kanastrous wrote:Beats being embargoed, undermined, or bombed by the Grown-Ups Club.
Like happened to North Korea after they declared that they had nuclear arms? Oh, wait, the world didn't do shit after that point.
I'm sure you know all about the reasons that North Korea wasn't particularly amenable to being moved by threats of force. Even if anyone had been willing to offer some.
Lord of the Abyss wrote: Except that with Iraq we've demonstrated that we'll do that anyway.
I think that Iraq will be recognized for the aberration that it was. At least, I *hope* that it eventually will be.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by General Zod »

DEATH wrote:
Kanastrous wrote:Beats being embargoed, undermined, or bombed by the Grown-Ups Club.
Like happened to North Korea after they declared that they had nuclear arms? Oh, wait, the world didn't do shit after that point.
Yup, there's no reason for any nation to assume that going "We have nukes now, so fuck off" won't result in an immediate forceful global response :roll:
North Korea also had China covering its ass if anyone attacked and giving it the hairy eyeball to keep it in line. Most of the ME powers have no such benefit.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Lord of the Abyss
Village Idiot
Posts: 4046
Joined: 2005-06-15 12:21am
Location: The Abyss

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Lord of the Abyss »

Kanastrous wrote:
Lord of the Abyss wrote: Except that with Iraq we've demonstrated that we'll do that anyway.
I think that Iraq will be recognized for the aberration that it was. At least, I *hope* that it eventually will be.
America acting as the Global Bully is hardly an "aberration". And we've been Iran's enemies for a long time.
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
Pelranius
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3539
Joined: 2006-10-24 11:35am
Location: Around and about the Beltway

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Pelranius »

General Zod wrote:
DEATH wrote:
Kanastrous wrote:Beats being embargoed, undermined, or bombed by the Grown-Ups Club.
Like happened to North Korea after they declared that they had nuclear arms? Oh, wait, the world didn't do shit after that point.
Yup, there's no reason for any nation to assume that going "We have nukes now, so fuck off" won't result in an immediate forceful global response :roll:
North Korea also had China covering its ass if anyone attacked and giving it the hairy eyeball to keep it in line. Most of the ME powers have no such benefit.
Actually, the Chinese moved the 38th Group Army to the North Korean border right after the 2006 nuke test. Guess what that means?
Turns out that a five way cross over between It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, the Ali G Show, Fargo, Idiocracy and Veep is a lot less funny when you're actually living in it.
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Kanastrous »

They don't want North Korean refugees crossing their border, if/when the balloon goes up?
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
Duckie
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3980
Joined: 2003-08-28 08:16pm

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Duckie »

Speaking of Bush not being as articulate, who can imagine Bush giving an interview to a network called, of all things, al-'Arabiyyah?
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Obama's Al-Arabiya Interview

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Lord of the Abyss wrote:
Kanastrous wrote:
Lord of the Abyss wrote: Except that with Iraq we've demonstrated that we'll do that anyway.
I think that Iraq will be recognized for the aberration that it was. At least, I *hope* that it eventually will be.
America acting as the Global Bully is hardly an "aberration". And we've been Iran's enemies for a long time.
America could just play it smart and give the Iraqis chemical weapons to kill Iranians with, and turn a blind eye while people scream of war crimes happening in this hypothetical Iraq-Iran war, and then a few decades later Iraq can be re-invaded when its American-supported dictators become inconvenient, and the premise of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction can be used as justification. Except we won't talk about the gassed Iranians, just those Kurds. :mrgreen:

We can't afford to let those Iranians have nuclear weapons. They will destabilize the Middle East.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
Post Reply