Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Big Orange »

Yet another reason in a huge list of reasons why I'm not voting for the Tories despite New L(ie)bours fuck ups:
The morning Gordon made David choke on his porridge

The Tory leader's getting angry and he's turning up the volume – lambasting the Prime Minister as a headless chicken and the House of Lords for its toxic cocktail of money and politics

Interview by Andrew Grice
Wednesday, 28 January 2009

"I choked on my porridge this morning," David Cameron said. He wasn't joking about his favourite breakfast food at his family's regular 7.30am start to the day in Notting Hill, west London. What stuck in his throat yesterday was a newspaper report of Gordon Brown describing the economic crisis as "the birth pangs of a new global order."

The Tory leader is still angry about it six hours later when The Independent interviews him in his Westminster office overlooking the river Thames. The Brown Government, he declares, is "in a state of denial" about the economy. "Imagine how you would feel if you had just had your home repossessed, lost your job or couldn't get credit: 'It's all right, I'm just a birth pang.' It was a bit of a moment."

Mr Cameron accuses Mr Brown of "behaving like a headless chicken" and "an opposition rather than a government" as he rolls out economic initiatives almost daily. "There is a sense that the Government is thrashing around wildly, throwing stuff out, hoping something will stick. That is not good for confidence or the economy," he says.

"It is confusing activity with action. What people want is strong, bold and straightforward action on the things that matter. Instead, they get initiatives. It doesn't work because things are not followed through, and adds to the sense of fear and panic because it helps to undermine confidence."

For once, Mr Cameron's main theme is not the economy but how to clean up the House of Lords. Across the board, he wants to avoid repeating Tony Blair's mistake of over-promising. On this issue, he admits he would not deliver overnight a "nirvana" of squeaky-clean politics in which everyone wears "halos".

But he does pledge a better system so that inevitable problems stemming from the dangerous cocktail of politics and money are "found out and rooted out". He adds: "We have to be realistic. Money and politics is like water running down a street. It always funds a crack in the pavement. We have to be perennially vigilant." The Lords, he argues, is the weak leak in the chain. MPs have put a lot of effort into cleaning up the Commons, but not the second chamber, despite its extensive work on revising legislation and influence, because Labour does not enjoy an overall majority in the Upper House.

He said tougher rules would in future cover promises by those awarded peerages, such as to live in Britain and pay taxes here. This is potentially tricky territory. Lord Laidlaw, a Tory donor, had the party whip withdrawn after failing to honour his commitment to bring his tax affairs back to Britain. Lord Ashcroft, who remains a donor and a Tory deputy chairman, made a similar promise. What about his tax status? "You can ask him. I'm sure he will tell you," says Mr Cameron. (In fact, he won't, since his spokesman always argues that it is a private matter.)

The Tory leader is proud he cracked down on MPs' expenses before Labour, persuading all but four of the 193 Tories to voluntarily publish the details of their claims. Now he is trying to keep ahead of the game on the Lords by setting up a task force to produce reforms to bring it into line with the Commons.

However, his drive to clean up politics will stop short of imposing a ban on Shadow Cabinet members holding outside paid jobs after a rebellion led by William Hague, the shadow Foreign Secretary. "What matters is: are people working, performing, putting the hours in, doing the job. If we win the election, everyone will immediately be subject to the ministerial code," he insists.

"Cash for questions" bedevilled the last Tory government led by John Major. Now "cash for honours" and this week's "cash for laws" have engulfed Labour. "If Labour cried 'Tory sleaze' now," he says, "I think people would laugh at them."

He is worried that Mr Brown is using too many peers in important ministerial posts, citing four heavily involved in handling the banking crisis – Lord Mandelson, the Business minister Baroness Vadera, the City minister Lord Myners and the Trade minister Lord Davies. Although he intends to bring more peers on to his front bench, Mr Cameron insists: "If all the ministers making the decisions are in the House of Lords, that is not good for democracy."

Despite his growing feeling that time is running out for the Brown Government and two opinion polls this week putting the Tories 15 and 12 points ahead of Labour, Mr Cameron is taking nothing for granted. His warnings against complacency were vindicated when Mr Brown, written off by many in his own party, staged a remarkable fightback last autumn after saving the banks.

Although he now says Mr Brown's "hubris" over the first rescue was a mistake, Mr Cameron admits that at the end of last year, he believed the "Brown bounce" in the polls was so real that the Prime Minister might be tempted to call a general election next month "to trade on people's anxieties" in the recession.

Now the Tory leader appears to expect a 2010 poll, while insisting he will be ready at any time. "There is a very long road between now and whenever an election is called," he says revealingly. "You have to be ready. That is my job," he says. "I, my Shadow Cabinet, my party have to prove we would do better, have better ideas, would be a stronger team." It's not just about the economy: he promises that Tory thinking on health and education will be threshed out in the coming months, even if there is no election.

Mr Cameron is convinced his team is stronger after last week's Shadow Cabinet reshuffle. He is delighted that Kenneth Clarke, the shadow Business Secretary, is back after an 11-year absence from the front bench. It is a huge asset, he believes, to have in his team "the last Chancellor to lead us out of recession".

To his relief, even hardened Eurosceptics in his Witney constituency in Oxfordshire came up to him in the street last weekend to welcome his decision to recall Mr Clarke. They don't agree with the Clarke view of Europe, but were delighted to see him back where he belongs.

Like everyone at Westminster, Mr Cameron's eyes are on Washington. Shrugging off Labour claims that he is isolated on economic policy around the world, he insists: "Because Barack Obama is not having an immediate election, he is able to take the right long-term decisions. A new government in Britain would be able to take the right long-term decisions.

"The whole focus is on what the Conservative Party has to do to deserve to win. There is no such thing as a moment when politics has suddenly fundamentally shifted. You have got to keep working at making sure that when it comes to the election, you can look the British public in the eye and say we have the right policies, approach, character and judgement to take the country forward."

'It's 1.25 and I've met Ken three times already'

"I've had three meetings with Ken Clarke already today and it's only 1.25pm," David Cameron said. They were his daily 9.15am "council of war"; a meeting about the Government's package for the car industry and a session on the banks which also included George Osborne and Oliver Letwin.
Link

I want suggestions of workable solutions for the current problems partially caused by David Cameron's 1980s forebearers, not heckling and gimmicks. I dislike the lack of solidarity when the burning ship is sinking.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
DaveJB
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2003-10-06 05:37pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by DaveJB »

On a similar note, I just saw an extract from today's PMQT on the news... after the predictable round of mudslinging over the economy, Brown turned to the Speaker and said "Are we going to let this degrade to the level of student politics?" Cameron's response was literally "I'm not the student politician! You are!"

Cameron at least has the advantage of a decent support team, instead of the collection of fuckups that Brown has amassed. He still needs that certain something to give him a push over the top, though - right now you'd expect Labour to be headed for a Canada '93-style obliteration and reduction to third party status at the next election, yet most of the recent polls are only predicting a hung Parliament, with a slight Tory edge.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Vince Cable for PM!
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Rye »

I hate the Tories; their idiot right-wing bullshit infects the world and the only hope Labour had at getting in was to become fellators to the rich and famous and they almost ruined the country last time with their fucking privatisation. I hate Labour; they were "centrist" while it suited them and have since become more authoritarian, more faith-schooly and didn't clamp down on the bankers while it all looked too good to be true. I hate the Lib Dems; they're too allied with environmentalists that hate Nuclear. They've pretty much stated that one of the best things the Labour government has done (albeit too half-heartedly), the building of new nukes is evil and harmful and needs to be stopped in favour of wind turbines and shit.

I'm voting BNP! Image
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Monster Raving Looney need to come back. The main three parties really bug me in many ways, each having maybe one or two redeeming members or policies. It's too bad things are always black or white, never "Hey, good plan. Let's work together for that too". Partisanship is such a winning strategy, especially when combined with lobbying and frequent battles for re-election, rather than getting the damn job done. Least the Chinese got something right there.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Big Orange »

Britain's political system is edging perilously close to complete deadlock, complete and utter deadlock.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
Jade Falcon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1705
Joined: 2004-07-27 06:22pm
Location: Jade Falcon HQ, Ayr, Scotland, UK
Contact:

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Jade Falcon »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Monster Raving Looney need to come back. The main three parties really bug me in many ways, each having maybe one or two redeeming members or policies. It's too bad things are always black or white, never "Hey, good plan. Let's work together for that too". Partisanship is such a winning strategy, especially when combined with lobbying and frequent battles for re-election, rather than getting the damn job done. Least the Chinese got something right there.
Wasn't it the MRLP who once asked why there was only one Monopolies Commission? :)
Don't Move you're surrounded by Armed Bastards - Gene Hunt's attempt at Diplomacy

I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own - Number 6

The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
User avatar
The Guid
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1888
Joined: 2005-04-05 10:22pm
Location: Northamptonshire, UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by The Guid »

Big Orange wrote:Britain's political system is edging perilously close to complete deadlock, complete and utter deadlock.
That statement couldn't be more false. The biggest problem with the political system is that it is very rare to get deadlock. One party, even with a fraction of the support can, because of our electoral system, push things through as laws without giving a single thing up to the other side. It is very rare that the cabinet and Downing Street don't get exactly what they want pushed through at least the Commons, and most likely the House of Lords.
I'm voting BNP!
I'm going to presume this is a joke in very poor taste.
Vince Cable for PM!
Or Chancellor of the Exchequer? Maybe in a Lib Dem government. I can dream.
Self declared winner of The Posedown Thread
EBC - "What? What?" "Tally Ho!" Division
I wrote this:The British Avengers fanfiction

"Yeah, funny how that works - you giving hungry people food they vote for you. You give homeless people shelter they vote for you. You give the unemployed a job they vote for you.

Maybe if the conservative ideology put a roof overhead, food on the table, and employed the downtrodden the poor folk would be all for it, too". - Broomstick
User avatar
Dartzap
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5969
Joined: 2002-09-05 09:56am
Location: Britain, Britain, Britain: Land Of Rain
Contact:

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Dartzap »

Vince Cable is about the only fellow who generally sounds like he knows what he's doing, and generally isn't one for pussy footing around issues. Daily Politics is always more amusing when he's on.
EBC: Northeners, Huh! What are they good for?! Absolutely nothing! :P

Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus

Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
User avatar
DaveJB
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2003-10-06 05:37pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by DaveJB »

The Guid wrote:That statement couldn't be more false. The biggest problem with the political system is that it is very rare to get deadlock. One party, even with a fraction of the support can, because of our electoral system, push things through as laws without giving a single thing up to the other side. It is very rare that the cabinet and Downing Street don't get exactly what they want pushed through at least the Commons, and most likely the House of Lords.
In all fairness, polls are showing a hung Parliament if we were to have an election now, and neither David Cameron nor Gordon Brown have very high approval ratings. I can't see that scenario lasting however, and if Cameron isn't Prime Minister by the end of next year, then he has screwed up royally (or Brown has actually saved the world, which is even less likely IMO).

Question is, where do Labour go after this? The apotheosis of "Old" Labour's policies was the Winter of Discontent, and "New Labour" has lead us into this situation. They're probably going to have to reinvent themselves again, but what as?
User avatar
Dartzap
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5969
Joined: 2002-09-05 09:56am
Location: Britain, Britain, Britain: Land Of Rain
Contact:

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Dartzap »

Question is, where do Labour go after this? The apotheosis of "Old" Labour's policies was the Winter of Discontent, and "New Labour" has lead us into this situation. They're probably going to have to reinvent themselves again, but what as?
Competent preferably, able at a minimum :wink:

The Tories do indeed have a better chance of getting in Power than for the last decade, although peoples memories are very long. (Just not long enough for the winter of discount tents) Labour are up the creek, and possible forgot to invest in a boat, let alone a paddle.

The Libs were last in power uh..... almost a century ago now. Fat chance any of them know how to get the CS to do what the party wants in the highly unlikely scenario they get into power sometime in the next millennia or so.

The BNP are losing ground as well (thank the hells for that), since the Poles are doing the job for them and fleeing for greener pastures.

UKIP, whilst not as bad as the BNP is most respects, are pretty much a one trick pony (The EU) So...uh.....anyone else left that aren't racists, imbeciles or George Galloway?

Ooh! Boris for PM! Vince for the Chancellorship! :lol:
EBC: Northeners, Huh! What are they good for?! Absolutely nothing! :P

Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus

Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
User avatar
Jade Falcon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1705
Joined: 2004-07-27 06:22pm
Location: Jade Falcon HQ, Ayr, Scotland, UK
Contact:

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Jade Falcon »

God, that would be an unholy combination, George Galloway for PM with Tommy Sheridan as Deputy.
Don't Move you're surrounded by Armed Bastards - Gene Hunt's attempt at Diplomacy

I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own - Number 6

The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
User avatar
Ubiquitous
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2825
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:07pm

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Ubiquitous »

Jade Falcon wrote:God, that would be an unholy combination, George Galloway for PM with Tommy Sheridan as Deputy.
Israel would be destroyed within a day if that came to fruition!

Has anyone read on the political blogs the rumours circulating about Brown's current mental state, how he was almost crying last night when pleading for his rebels not to vote against the government on the Heathrow vote?

And the Guy Fawkes blog also mentioned that Brown, allegedly, pissed his pants during a press conference on monday. Literally pissed his pants.

Disturbing stuff.
"I'm personally against seeing my pictures and statues in the streets - but it's what the people want." - Saparmurat Niyazov
"I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent." - Q
HAB Military Intelligence: Providing sexed-up dodgy dossiers for illegal invasions since 2003.
User avatar
DaveJB
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2003-10-06 05:37pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by DaveJB »

Sounds dubious on both counts. Brown probably wouldn't directly deal with the rebels directly, he'd have the party whips and maybe a couple of frontbenchers do it, and you'd expect the tabloids to have been all over Brown's case if he did wet himself in a press conference.
User avatar
Ubiquitous
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2825
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:07pm

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Ubiquitous »

DaveJB wrote:Sounds dubious on both counts. Brown probably wouldn't directly deal with the rebels directly, he'd have the party whips and maybe a couple of frontbenchers do it, and you'd expect the tabloids to have been all over Brown's case if he did wet himself in a press conference.
I should have included a link for my assertion:

http://blogs.news.sky.com/boultonandco/ ... 1d2d268749

Quotes unnamed Labour MP's, but this source is a strong one.
"I'm personally against seeing my pictures and statues in the streets - but it's what the people want." - Saparmurat Niyazov
"I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent." - Q
HAB Military Intelligence: Providing sexed-up dodgy dossiers for illegal invasions since 2003.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Big Orange »

The trouble is the reason Labour came back into power was mainly because they essentially became the Conservative Party Mk. II by also becoming patsies for the Turbo-Capitalist Kleptocracy who have a vested interest in the entire country being sold down the river. And on a related note British workers at a fuel refinery have taken Gordon Brown's quote 'British jobs for British workers' as their battle cry, when they fiercely protested against their employers hiring hundreds of Italians.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
DaveJB
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2003-10-06 05:37pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by DaveJB »

I've said before that Brown's premiership is a re-run of Jim Callaghan's, but it's starting to get truly ridiculous now - we seem to be having a second Winter of Discontent! We've even got car manufacturers operating 3 day weeks, as if we didn't need more reminders of the 1970s.
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Rye »

Ubiquitous wrote:
DaveJB wrote:Sounds dubious on both counts. Brown probably wouldn't directly deal with the rebels directly, he'd have the party whips and maybe a couple of frontbenchers do it, and you'd expect the tabloids to have been all over Brown's case if he did wet himself in a press conference.
I should have included a link for my assertion:

http://blogs.news.sky.com/boultonandco/ ... 1d2d268749

Quotes unnamed Labour MP's, but this source is a strong one.
What? Where does it say he pissed himself? It said he was "emotional and teary eyed" trying to get Heathrow's new terminal through.
The Guid wrote:I'm going to presume this is a joke in very poor taste.
What the hell do you think?
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
The Guid
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1888
Joined: 2005-04-05 10:22pm
Location: Northamptonshire, UK

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by The Guid »

Zuul wrote:
The Guid wrote:I'm going to presume this is a joke in very poor taste.
What the hell do you think?
That it is a joke in poor taste. I would love confirmation. I don't find the BNP amusing. Sorry.
Self declared winner of The Posedown Thread
EBC - "What? What?" "Tally Ho!" Division
I wrote this:The British Avengers fanfiction

"Yeah, funny how that works - you giving hungry people food they vote for you. You give homeless people shelter they vote for you. You give the unemployed a job they vote for you.

Maybe if the conservative ideology put a roof overhead, food on the table, and employed the downtrodden the poor folk would be all for it, too". - Broomstick
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Big Orange »

The Guid wrote: That it is a joke in poor taste. I would love confirmation. I don't find the BNP amusing. Sorry.
I find them amusing in a darkly comical way - they're on the opposite side of the similarily irrelevant (also disproportionately vocal) Green Party. But these morons are having a field day with the Total Oil strike, although to be fair there was an above board bidding between sub-contractors and it went to a foreign company fair and square, which shipped its own workers in from Europe, a 200 million pound business process that was likely signed through same time last year before the global economy went South. Which still strikes me as a little audacious and unnecessary, since the workers came from Italy and Portugal, countries with (overall) similar wages and standards of living to Britain, and it seems especially unpleasant that they're confined onto boats (so they don't fraternize or contribute to the local service economy).

I hope this strike is more than just jealous and petty xenophobia, but a strike against the system itself which is becoming unworkable and turning Europeans (and the rest of the world) into expendable serfs to shipped everywhere or left on the scrapheap, with no investment into the societies they're been transplanted into or away from.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
Raptor
Youngling
Posts: 60
Joined: 2008-06-10 12:15am

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Raptor »

The problem is with the Total Oil strike, is that it is perfect BNP material -a foreign company bring in its own worker to the UK and not employing British workers and keeping them seperate from everone else. The BNP press couldn't have come up with a better story (I suppose they could- black, jewish workers ?). But the main reason is the construction industry in this country has been hit hard. Except for the financial sector contsruction is the worst hit. My Dad, is a carpenter and has been out of work for about 5 months now. Despite the recessions in the 80's and 90's him and his work mates haven't seen it this bad. Now to him and all the others out of work, can now point to someone and say 'they DID take my job this time'. This situation is made worse by Gordon Brown's 'British jobs for British workers' speech a load of shit, which it was at the time but people didn't have a good enough example to point to. The other parties can point at these two things and slam the goverment over it. Are we right too? Thats tough. The EU idea of people bring able to travel and work freely is good. Until it starts affecting the native population?
User avatar
Ubiquitous
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2825
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:07pm

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Ubiquitous »

I am getting very worried that this country is going to have a winter like none of us have ever experienced before, and to make matters worse we have a compulsive liar in control of us who pretends that we are in a better place than other nations to get through this, but in reality are in an awful mess even compared to the Mediterranean economies.

I hate Wildcat strikes, and I fear that this is just the first wave to hit the economy unless Brown does something about them.

[the comment about Brown pissing his pants is at the Guido Fawkes blog not to Sky News blog].
"I'm personally against seeing my pictures and statues in the streets - but it's what the people want." - Saparmurat Niyazov
"I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent." - Q
HAB Military Intelligence: Providing sexed-up dodgy dossiers for illegal invasions since 2003.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Gordon Brown (PM) and David Cameron (Tory leader) Bicker.

Post by Big Orange »

The British government as we know could go through a new, drastic watershed, like Argentina did when their economy went bust in the early 00s because of the same boneheaded Neo-Liberal economic polcies, with heads of state changing every few days or weeks.

Our public transport also needs a good kick up the backside and we should be geared more towards producing than consuming, which like in America has run up fecktastic trade deficits. While it is crass to pull out of the EU altogether, our politicians should stop aggressively enforcing draconian EU rugulations and polcies that are not really in Britain's interests - back in 2004 only Ireland, Britain, and Sweden's governments greedily opted to flood their countries with cheap Eastern European workers which went down well in Britain as a brick through a coffee table if you weren't an employer.

Now that many Polish workers and the like have been going back to their homelands, prompeted by the UK economy dying, Total Oil bringing in non-local workers confined onto boats now seems in very bad taste hence the more angry than usual response from British workers, buggering Total's operation up. Which should make the French owned EDF think twice about potentially snubbing local workers from taking part in their nuclear power projects (which we really need).
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
Post Reply