The rest of the story isn't really that interesting, to be honest. We've seen it all before, and the restaurant is promising to change its ways. What's more entertaining is the sheer idiocy of the people commenting on the news website linked above. Seriously, what is wrong with these idiots?Moms Stage 'Nurse-In' At Chick-Fil-A
Restaurant Says It Will Do More to Educate Staff About Breastfeeding
POSTED: Friday, August 14, 2009
UPDATED: 1:46 pm EDT August 14, 2009
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A group of breastfeeding women descended on a local Chick-Fil-A restaurant Friday afternoon.
They're trying to make a point the point that it's OK to breastfeed in public.
The "Nurse-In," as it is being dubbed, was organized by a mother who felt she was discriminated against at the restaurant.
She was breastfeeding her child when a restaurant employee told her to cover up.
...
Look at some of these comments:
robbie79 wrote:I think the problem comes in is YOU WANT TO LOOK but can't. That's what makes it uncomfortable. Like a car wreck. And I stick by my opinion that u never see a hot lady breastfeeding.
YeaEnfamil wrote:I know, I know, Robbie ,you're right.
I just get het up over this one.
I keep thinking of some of those stories I've read of these gals who still claim it's groovy to be doing this when the kid is even old enough to ask for it.
Still getting their little thrill at the expense of an innocent kid.
It takes a certain 'kind' I guess
breezyboo wrote:You crazy moms! No body is saying you SHOULD NOT BREASTFEED. Breastfeed away, breastfeed till their in their teens! A lot of people just don't want to see some ladies boob while eating! I mean if we're letting boobs out in public, lets bring the rest of the no-no-parts out for some fresh air too!
broosa wrote:I think breastfeeding is a very special and private connection between a mother and a baby. I wouldn't want anybody to see and especially to interfere these happy moments.
Why would a woman want it? It disturbs a baby. It's not a show.
I like old times morals. Women have to respect themselves.
robie78 wrote:A boob is a boob. A drink is a drink. A lunch is a lunch. Breastfeeding in public fine. Asking some on in a restaurant to cover with a blanket or towel is not telling them they can't. People just need a little common desency.
breezyboo wrote:Silly people, your minds could not comprehend my superior analogy! I did not say MILK was URINE. I was simply implying that the action of breast feeding, just like the action of urinating, in public might be offensive to people. In America, the country we live in, breasts are commonly associated with sex, and thats it. If you want to have your boobs more accepted, move, because here boobs=sex to the majority of american minds.
Believe it or not, all of this idiocy is just from the first page of comments. I couldn't be bothered to click to see the rest of the comments. You can't even dismiss this as a bunch of idiot teenagers, because this is pitiful even for a dumbshit teenager.YeaEnfamil wrote:I LUVED the comment from whomever who said if these thrill-seeking 'moms' think they have the right to expose themselves in public , then folks should have the right to stare and ogle!
I think it would be hilariously funny to sit in the booth next to them ala 'Lucy in the Restaurant with William Holden' and just lean on one's arms and stare and stare for the entire time.
I am a female who has had seven beautiful children and only tried the breastfeeding thing with my second marriage twins because my hubby wanted me to try it.
It totally felt unnatural and wrong and....I don't know...... I once read an article by a Militantly ANTI Breastfeeding woman who said she honestly wonders if humans breastfeeding didn't evolve somehow through centuries of men and women constantly seeking the ever sought after sexual thrill by watching the animals. Maybe a stretch, but an interesting thought, because if certain insects or animals can adapt and be both genders over time, as some can, maybe it isn't too far fetched to think of.