Lebanon has no goverment but is in the UNSC

[Ace Pace]

Lebanon, which some of you may know as this country that has recently been in a war, survived or lost to an attempted coup and currently does not have a functioning goverment, has been appointed to the United Nations Security Council.

Bosnia, Brazil, Gabon, Lebanon and Nigeria were elected Thursday to non-permanent seats on the U.N. Security Council. They will serve two-year terms starting January 1 and will participate in decisions ranging from deploying U.N. peacekeepers to imposing sanctions.

This year's vote lacked the suspense of some previous elections, because all five candidates were unopposed and succeeded in getting the two-thirds majority required in the first round of secret ballots.

Ten of the council's 15-seats are filled by regional representatives for two-year terms. The other five seats are permanent ones held by veto-wielding members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States.

British Ambassador John Sawers said the additions to the council will make it even stronger.

"We have two large countries in Brazil and Nigeria who carry the weight of being a regional power," he said. "We have two countries in Lebanon and Bosnia who have been through conflict and can bring their own national experiences to the Security Council."

Lebanon and Bosnia and Herzegovina, are in the unusual position of also being on the council's agenda.

Bosnia is a multiethnic country still recovering from the war that accompanied the break-up of Yugoslavia. It has experienced internal divisions and rising tensions in the past year, as major political parties struggle to agree on a basic political structure.

Bosnian Foreign Minister Sven Alkalaj said the current political crisis would not adversely impact its role on the council or prevent it from taking common positions.

"The situation in Bosnia is going to be stable, it is now stable. What is happening now is some political crisis that [also] happens elsewhere in world," he said.

Lebanon has one of the largest U.N. peacekeeping forces in the south of its country. It is also the subject of a U.N.-backed tribunal which is considering indictments in the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. Internal divisions have prevented the formation of a new government following June elections.

One council diplomat said Lebanon could prove to be something of a wild card on Middle East issues - particularly Iran's nuclear ambitions. He noted that if the Iranian dossier comes back to the council for possible sanctions, Lebanon, which will likely have members of Iranian-backed Hezbollah's political wing in its next government, could have a conflict of interest and choose to abstain from voting.

Meanwhile, Brazil joins the council for the 10th time. It is a founding member of the United Nations and was part of the first group elected to the Security Council in 1946.

Nigeria has served three times before. Foreign Minister Ojo Maduekwe said his country would work to prevent crises and conflicts, deal with human rights issues and generally promote international solidarity.

"We intend that working with all the other members of the U.N. Security Council," he said. "Our preventive diplomacy will be central to our approach to a lot of issues."

Nominations for non-permanent seats are not required, countries simply announce their intention to run. Consideration is given to an equitable geographical distribution and a candidate's contribution to the maintenance of international peace and security.

The five new members are replacing out-going council members Burkina Faso, Costa Rica, Croatia, Libya and Vietnam. In addition to the five permanent council members, they will join Austria, Mexico, Japan, Turkey and Uganda on the 15-member council.

Anyone thinks the nomination of countries to the UNSC should at the very least include only stable countries? I mean, if Lebanon is a go, why not Afghanistan, Iraq or any other nation that barely qualifies has having a government?

[frogcurry]

No, because if you start trying to discriminate between UN members on some criteria, then the whole idea loses its purpose. Plus by that criteria North Korea is potentially a better candidate than many democratic nations who have problems forming governments due to split votes. You don't need a political-level government to stick a diplomat in a chair in New York, just a functioning foreign office and an embassy to the UN who can provide the representative staff.

[weemadando]

Awwwww. Poor Kevin Rudd's plan to gain REAL ULTIMATE POWER obviously failed. And we're instead landed with two nation which might as well be in a state of civil war, one that is a monarchy re-labelled democracy which just had the courts uphold fraudulent election, one where the seccessonists are only slightly crazier than those in the US and only marginally more racist. And Brazil.

[Mr Flibble]

Awwwww. Poor Kevin Rudd's plan to gain REAL ULTIMATE POWER obviously failed. And we're instead landed with two nation which might as well be in a state of civil war, one that is a monarchy re-labelled democracy which just had the courts uphold fraudulent election, one where the seccessonists are only slightly crazier than those in the US and only marginally more racist. And Brazil.

Ahh Rudd was pushing for Australia to be elected to the UNSC in 2013, not now. In other words, he is using it to look like he is a big statesman to the Australian voters, but not actually doing anything (hence picking a time, well after the next election).