Nobel winners support weapons export banA popular initiative calling for a ban on Swiss weapons exports has locked pacifists and business leaders in a conflict that will be resolved on polling day.
Swiss industry has mobilised a campaign against the ban, arguing that it would cost jobs while the "yes" camp says lives come before profits. The government has recommended that voters reject a ban.
On November 29, Switzerland will vote on the controversial and emotional subject for the third time since 1972. Two previous attempts to halt Swiss-made weapons exports have failed.
Unlike previous attempts, the current initiative only calls for a ban on military, not civilian, weapons and ammunition. It also stipulates that taxpayers' money should be spent on retraining the industry's workforce for more peaceful production.
The Group for a Switzerland without an Army – the body behind the initiative – is convinced that people would back an export ban this time around.
War and peace
"We don't want Swiss weapons to be involved in wars any longer and we don't want Switzerland to export weapons that are used in conflicts that the majority of the Swiss population are not in favour of," spokesman Tom Cassee told swissinfo.ch.
"It also contradicts our neutrality. When a country is not involved in foreign wars it should not export weapons to other countries," he added.
Switzerland's leading business and manufacturing organisations launched a coordinated campaign this week against a ban. They believe companies would collapse and that 10,000 jobs could be lost, also in the civilian sector where some military technological innovations are used.
"It's not a question of war and peace. We have to be realistic, there are conflicts around the world," Swiss Business Federation director Pascal Gentinetta told swissinfo.ch.
"Most of the weapons are used for self-defence and Switzerland also has the right to defend itself. Because we are a small country we have to export goods abroad [to support the industry]."
In addition, the campaign argues that spending an estimated SFr500 million ($490 million) of federal funds to repair the damage would be folly in the current economic climate.Export destinations
The Swiss cabinet has also come out against a weapons export ban. Economics Minister Doris Leuthard told a public meeting in Zurich on Monday that Swiss controls of the annual 2,000-2,500 export requests are the tightest in Europe.
She added that 70 per cent of material goes to European Union countries. "Even in less developed countries people have the right to defend themselves. Humanitarian aid is only possible with a certain amount of military back-up," Leuthard said.
She added that a collapse of the Swiss weapons industry would also harm the country's own army.
Tom Cassee said the popular initiative was not a back door route to getting rid of the Swiss army. And he insisted that some Swiss-made weapons end up in the wrong hands, taking particular issue with exports to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
"There are a lot of Swiss weapons killing innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan at the moment," he told swissinfo.ch. "Nobody can be sure that [Swiss-made] weapons are not in the hands of the Taliban because we know that a lot go directly from the Pakistan army to the other side."
A survey by the gfs.berne polling and research institute, six weeks before the vote, found that 41 per cent of those questioned intended to vote in favour of the export ban while 44 per cent said they would oppose the popular initiative.
Yeah, I guess those damn Taliban have stolen those anti-aircraft systems from the Pakistani Army and are now using them to slaughter civilians. Where is he getting his "information" from? And when he says it isn't "a back door route to getting rid of the Swiss army" he's lying, that's what the whole organisation (Group for a Switzerland without an Army) is about.
Two Nobel Peace Prize winners, South Africa's Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Argentina's Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, have backed an initiative to ban Swiss arms exports.
The Swiss will vote on the proposal on November 29.
The pacifist organisation behind the initiative, Group for a Switzerland without an Army, released a statement on Monday saying it was surprised to receive the letters last week from Tutu and Esquivel, which arrived independently of each other.
"By halting its delivery of war material, Switzerland could make a unique contribution to support the peaceful and sustainable development of our planet and a shining example for other countries to question their export policies," Tutu said in a copy of the letter made public by the Group.
"I think it is vital that swords are beaten into ploughshares and awareness is raised of the necessity for the arms industry to convert to making products for civil use," added Esquivel in his note.
Meanwhile, Ruag, the state-owned technology concern with a large defence unit, said on Monday that it would have to shed up 2,000 jobs – or more than a quarter of its worldwide workforce – if the Swiss vote in favour of the ban.
What a naive bunch of morons. But hey, lets get rid of a bunch of jobs (estimates of up to 10K jobs that could be lost) when the economy isn't doing well.
). The last big contraversy was that Chad jury-rigged a bunch of machine guns onto a Pilatus flight trainer they had, that was apparently the manufacturer's fault (I guess Toyota is to blame for every one of their Hilux trucks that get turned into technicals