One country planting mysterious spy devices near whitehouse

[mr friendly guy]

It's totally China via Huawei

Israel accused of planting mysterious spy devices near the White House
The likely Israeli spying efforts were uncovered during the Trump presidency, several former top U.S. officials said.

By DANIEL LIPPMAN 09/12/2019 05:14 AM EDT Updated 09/12/2019 06:34 PM EDT

The U.S. government concluded within the past two years that Israel was most likely behind the placement of cellphone surveillance devices that were found near the White House and other sensitive locations around Washington, according to three former senior U.S. officials with knowledge of the matter.

But unlike most other occasions when flagrant incidents of foreign spying have been discovered on American soil, the Trump administration did not rebuke the Israeli government, and there were no consequences for Israel’s behavior, one of the former officials said.

The miniature surveillance devices, colloquially known as “StingRays,” mimic regular cell towers to fool cellphones into giving them their locations and identity information. Formally called international mobile subscriber identity-catchers or IMSI-catchers, they also can capture the contents of calls and data use.

The devices were likely intended to spy on President Donald Trump, one of the former officials said, as well as his top aides and closest associates — though it’s not clear whether the Israeli efforts were successful.

Trump is reputed to be lax in observing White House security protocols. POLITICO reported in May 2018 that the president often used an insufficiently secured cellphone to communicate with friends and confidants. The New York Times subsequently reported in October 2018 that “Chinese spies are often listening” to Trump’s cellphone calls, prompting the president to slam the story as “so incorrect I do not have time here to correct it.” (A former official said Trump has had his cellphone hardened against intrusion.)

By then, as part of tests by the federal government, officials at the Department of Homeland Security had already discovered evidence of the surveillance devices around the nation’s capital, but weren’t able to attribute the devices to specific entities. The officials shared their findings with relevant federal agencies, according to a letter a top Department of Homeland Security official, Christopher Krebs, wrote in May 2018 to Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

POLITICO Playbook newsletter
Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics

Email
Your email…
Sign Up
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Based on a detailed forensic analysis, the FBI and other agencies working on the case felt confident that Israeli agents had placed the devices, according to the former officials, several of whom served in top intelligence and national security posts.

That analysis, one of the former officials said, is typically led by the FBI’s counterintelligence division and involves examining the devices so that they “tell you a little about their history, where the parts and pieces come from, how old are they, who had access to them, and that will help get you to what the origins are.” For these types of investigations, the bureau often leans on the National Security Agency and sometimes the CIA (DHS and the Secret Service played a supporting role in this specific investigation).

“It was pretty clear that the Israelis were responsible,” said a former senior intelligence official.

An Israeli Embassy spokesperson, Elad Strohmayer, denied that Israel placed the devices and said: “These allegations are absolute nonsense. Israel doesn’t conduct espionage operations in the United States, period.”

A senior Trump administration official said the administration doesn’t “comment on matters related to security or intelligence.” The FBI declined to comment, while DHS and the Secret Service didn’t respond to requests for comment.

After this story was published, Trump told reporters that he would find it "hard to believe" that the Israelis had placed the devices.

"I don't think the Israelis were spying on us," Trump said. "My relationship with Israel has been great...Anything is possible but I don't believe it."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also denied after publication that Israel was behind the devices. "We have a directive, I have a directive: No intelligence work in the United States, no spies," he said in a gaggle with reporters. "And it's vigorously implemented, without any exception. It [the report] is a complete fabrication, a complete fabrication."

But former officials with deep experience dealing with intelligence matters scoff at the Israeli claim — a pro forma denial Israeli officials are also known to make in private to skeptical U.S. counterparts.

One former senior intelligence official noted that after the FBI and other agencies concluded that the Israelis were most likely responsible for the devices, the Trump administration took no action to punish or even privately scold the Israeli government.

“The reaction ... was very different than it would have been in the last administration,” this person said. “With the current administration, there are a different set of calculations in regard to addressing this.”

The former senior intelligence official criticized how the administration handled the matter, remarking on the striking difference from past administrations, which likely would have at a very minimum issued a démarche, or formal diplomatic reprimand, to the foreign government condemning its actions.

“I’m not aware of any accountability at all,” the former official said.

Beyond trying to intercept the private conversations of top officials — prized information for any intelligence service — foreign countries often will try to surveil their close associates as well. With the president, the former senior Trump administration official noted, that could include trying to listen in on the devices of the people he regularly communicates with, such as Steve Wynn, Sean Hannity and Rudy Giuliani.

“The people in that circle are heavily targeted,” the former Trump official said.

Another circle of surveillance targets includes people who regularly talk to Trump’s friends and informal advisers. Information obtained from any of these people “would be so valuable in a town that is like three degrees of separation like Kevin Bacon,” the former official added.

That’s true even for a close U.S. ally like Israel, which often seeks an edge in its diplomatic maneuvering with the United States.

“The Israelis are pretty aggressive” in their intelligence gathering operations, said a former senior intelligence official. “They’re all about protecting the security of the Israeli state and they do whatever they feel they have to to achieve that objective.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with President Donald Trump. | Michael Reynolds/Getty Images

So even though Trump has formed a warm relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and made numerous policy moves favorable to the Israeli government — such as moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, ripping up the Iran nuclear deal and heavily targeting Iran with sanctions — Israel became a prime suspect in planting the devices.

While the Chinese, who have been regularly caught doing intelligence operations in the U.S., were also seen as potential suspects, they were determined as unlikely to have placed the devices based on a close analysis of the devices.

“You can often, depending upon the tradecraft of the people who put them in place, figure out who’s been accessing them to pull the data off the devices,” another former senior U.S. intelligence official explained.

Washington is awash in surveillance, and efforts of foreign entities to try to spy on administration officials and other top political figures are fairly common. But not many countries have the capability — or the budget — to plant the devices found in this most recent incident, which is another reason suspicion fell on Israel.

IMSI-catchers, which are often used by local police agencies to surveil criminals, can also be made by sophisticated hobbyists or by the Harris Corp., the manufacturer of StingRays, which cost more than $150,000 each, according to Vice News.

“The costs involved are really significant,” according to a former senior Trump administration official. “This is not an easy or ubiquitous practice.”

Morning Cybersecurity
A daily briefing on politics and cybersecurity — weekday mornings, in your inbox.

Email
Your email…
Sign Up
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Among professionals, the Israeli intelligence services have an especially fearsome reputation. But they do sometimes make mistakes and are “not 10 feet tall like you see in the movies,” a former senior intelligence official noted.

In 2010, the secret covers of a Mossad hit team, some of whom had been posing as tennis players, were blown after almost 30 minutes of surveillance video was posted online of them going through a luxury Dubai hotel where they killed a top Hamas terrorist in his room.

Still, U.S. officials sometimes have been taken aback by Israel’s brazen spying. One former U.S. government official recalled his frequent concern that Israel knew about internal U.S. policy deliberations that were meant to be kept private.

“There were suspicions that they were listening in,” the former official said, based on his Israeli counterparts flaunting a level of detailed knowledge “that was hard to explain otherwise.”

“Sometimes it was sort of knowledge of our thinking. Occasionally there were some turns of phrase like language that as far as we knew had only appeared in drafts of speeches and never been actually used publicly, and then some Israeli official would repeat it back to us and say, ‘This would be really problematic if you were to say X,’” said the former official.

Back when the Obama administration was trying to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians, for example, the Israelis were eager to get advance knowledge of the language being debated that would describe the terms of reference of the talks.

“They would have had interest in what language [President Barack] Obama or [Secretary of State John] Kerry or someone else was going to use and might indeed try to find a way to lobby for language they liked or against language that they didn’t like and so having knowledge of that could be advantageous for them,” the former official said.

“The Israelis are aggressive intelligence collectors, but they have sworn off spying on the U.S. at various points and it’s not surprising that such efforts continue,” said Daniel Benjamin, a former coordinator of counterterrorism at the Obama State Department and now director of the John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding at Dartmouth.

Benjamin, who emphasized that he was not aware of the FBI's investigation into the cell-phone spoofing, recalled once meeting with a former head of Mossad, the premier Israeli intelligence agency, when he was out of office. The first thing the former Mossad official told Benjamin was that Israel didn’t spy on the U.S.

“I just told him our conversation was over if he had such a low estimate of my intelligence,” Benjamin said.

Israeli officials often note in conversations with their American counterparts — correctly — that the U.S. regularly gathers intelligence on Israeli leaders.

As for Israel’s recent surveillance of the White House, one of the former senior U.S. intelligence officials acknowledged it raised security concerns but joked, “On the other hand, guess what we do in Tel Aviv?"

This article has been updated to clarify that Daniel Benjamin had no knowledge of the alleged Israeli spying, and that the Israeli official he was speaking with was a former official at the time of their conversation.

I can't wait for the Israel gate coverage. Oh wait...

[The Romulan Republic]

Your sarcasm aside, a lot of the Democratic Party, at least, is DONE giving the Israeli government a free pass. Its not because they're anti-Semites, of course, though that's what Netanyahu and his fellow fascists will claim. Its because Netanyahu and Trump have openly tied support for Israel to the American far Right and white supremacy, and to Trumpism.

This, I suspect, will be Netanyahu's legacy- making American support for Israel a partisan issue.

Fucking dipshit.

[mr friendly guy]

Well I hope people stop giving Israel a free pass. All should be treated equally. I am just going to wait a bit longer before I say, yeah the Dems are done giving them a free pass. Although I would hope the media also applies the same standards. Well the media aside from RT.

[The Romulan Republic]

Fuck RT.

But yeah, its going to be hard for Democrats to justifying writing the Israeli government a blank check when that government basically coordinated with Trump's campaign of white supremacist harassment against sitting Democratic members of Congress.

[mr friendly guy]

In case it wasn't obvious, my implication was the the media now starts applying the same standards, aside from RT, because they already are applying the same standards, and they have pointed out if this was not Israel, but Iran/China/Russia, people like Rachael Maddow would be having a fit.

[The Romulan Republic]

In case it wasn't obvious, my implication was the the media now starts applying the same standards, aside from RT, because they already are applying the same standards, and they have pointed out if this was not Israel, but Iran/China/Russia, people like Rachael Maddow would be having a fit.

While arguing over RT is off-topic and a thread derail waiting to happen, the idea that RT is consistent in its criticism (as opposed to attacking the US and its allies while shielding Russia and its allies) is utterly laughable, or it would be if it wasn't so dangerous.

It continues to embarrass me to see supposed Left-wingers pretend that the Putin Regime is a bastion of fairness and integrity simply because they are critical of Western nations. Bias in the opposite direction is not fairness- its just more bias. Even if the Western media were as homogenously corrupt as you seem to believe, then at best RT would just be the flip-side of the same coin. But I forgot: "Both sides are just as bad" somehow means that everything the Kremlin and its puppets do is okay, even though the West is evil for doing the exact same things. That's the magic power of Whataboutism.

[mr friendly guy]

While arguing over RT is off-topic and a thread derail waiting to happen, the idea that RT is consistent in its criticism (as opposed to attacking the US and its allies while shielding Russia and its allies) is utterly laughable, or it would be if it wasn't so dangerous.

On this issue its consistent, ie all sides doing similar things against the US should get similar level of coverage in national news. Now they could be bullshitting on several other topics, but on this one they are at least consistent.

It continues to embarrass me to see supposed Left-wingers pretend that the Putin Regime is a bastion of fairness and integrity simply because they are critical of Western nations.

Who are these supposed Left Wingers? Who thinks Putin's regime is a bastion of fairness and integrity?

Bias in the opposite direction is not fairness- its just more bias. Even if the Western media were as homogenously corrupt as you seem to believe, then at best RT would just be the flip-side of the same coin.

I would say they are crap, lazy in the sense they can't even take 2 minutes of google to clarify things, uses what the old guard here on SD.net would describe as the "no numbers" / "irrelevant numbers" method of debating to create a certain narrative, and conveniently seem to forget to ask obvious questions, and they engage in gaslighting, but I wouldn't necessarily call them corrupt.

Not that I consider RT, or any news service to be perfect or free from bias. Such a standard to be free from bias is a bullshit standard, and trying to win the argument by saying my opponent is bias is a fallacious line of reasoning. However sometimes the bias is so obvious that the story is distorted in which case, you can attack the evidence provided, attack the fallacious reasoning or look at the double standards in which they apply the evidence.

And just for shits and giggles, I am going to go out on a limb here, but I don't think RT would mistake the Polish president for Vladimir Putin (unlike the NYT) or mistake a dildo for an ISIS symbol (unlike CNN). Just saying.

But I forgot: "Both sides are just as bad" somehow means that everything the Kremlin and its puppets do is okay, even though the West is evil for doing the exact same things. That's the magic power of Whataboutism.

Well..... must resist.... ok since you insist. Both sides are not just as bad. The US is in more military engagements right now than Russia, China and Iran combined. Yeah both sides are just as bad.

[The Romulan Republic]

On this issue its consistent, ie all sides doing similar things against the US should get similar level of coverage in national news. Now they could be bullshitting on several other topics, but on this one they are at least consistent.

Yes, they are consistently a propaganda mouthpiece for a gay-torturing, journalist-murdering, chemical-weapon using Neo-Fascist Mafia state.

Who are these supposed Left Wingers? Who thinks Putin's regime is a bastion of fairness and integrity?

Every stupid fucking "anti-establishment" Green and Bernie or Buster who thinks that by regurgitating Putin's propaganda and denying election interference, murder, and imperialism by the Russian state they're waging a righteous war against American Imperialism and capitalism.

I would say they are crap, lazy in the sense they can't even take 2 minutes of google to clarify things, uses what the old guard here on SD.net would describe as the "no numbers" / "irrelevant numbers" method of debating to create a certain narrative, and conveniently seem to forget to ask obvious questions, and they engage in gaslighting, but I wouldn't necessarily call them corrupt.

You are still overgeneralizing, treating "the media" as a homogenous block rather than as a collection of individual organizations and people (which plays into the "fake news" narrative of autocrats like Trump), but otherwise, fair enough.

Not that I consider RT, or any news service to be perfect or free from bias. Such a standard to be free from bias is a bullshit standard, and trying to win the argument by saying my opponent is bias is a fallacious line of reasoning. However sometimes the bias is so obvious that the story is distorted in which case, you can attack the evidence provided, attack the fallacious reasoning or look at the double standards in which they apply the evidence.

And just for shits and giggles, I am going to go out on a limb here, but I don't think RT would mistake the Polish president for Vladimir Putin (unlike the NYT) or mistake a dildo for an ISIS symbol (unlike CNN). Just saying.

Any organization every can make honest mistakes, even seemingly absurd ones. You can cherry pick a few examples out of literally thousands of stories over a span of decades to make any organization look bad. But there is a difference between a stupid fuck-up (like the examples described above) and deliberate propagandizing (what RT consistently does for Putin, because he'd have them murdered if they didn't), and the two should not be conflated.

Well..... must resist.... ok since you insist. Both sides are not just as bad. The US is in more military engagements right now than Russia, China and Iran combined. Yeah both sides are just as bad.

At least you admit what "Both Sides are just as bad" generally means in foreign policy debates- "I support Russia and China over the US."

Personally, I condemn no nation or its people, but I condemn every government which violates human rights or wages wars of aggression. I strive to be consistent in my support for democracy and human rights and my condemnation of imperialism and dictatorship, rather than judging it by which country is doing it.

And there are other measures of evil than how many wars a country is fighting. Like how many hundreds of thousands of racial or religious minorities it has in concentration camps (China is "winning" that one), or whether a viable domestic political opposition is allowed to exist (the US does increasingly badly on that score, but not nearly as badly as Russia and China).

But fuck it, enough with talking about who's better or worse. Condemn all tyrants, whatever borders they rule within and whatever flag they march under, or be condemned as one of them. Stop defending or ignoring the Kremlin's and Chinese governments' crimes, if you truly oppose warmongering and Imperialism. There are two sides: those who believe in the fundamental equality of all people, and those who don't. To hell with the rest of it.

[Ace Pace]

In what may be just a coincidence, a series of arrests in an Israeli defense contractor relating to selling espionage equipment without a license.

Ynet (hebrew)

The Ministry of Defense and the Police are investigating suspected "Ability" companies for crimes related to security exports, fraud and money laundering on a significant scale. The details of the investigation are not allowed for publication

...

The development in the investigation came after the Ministry of Defense had already suspended the companies from Israel's defense export register in March. This was after the ministry held a hearing on suspicion of violating the Security Export Control Act as part of marketing and export operations of listening and licensing systems without licenses.

I'm quite unsurprised if it turns out to be related.

Israel has a policy really does not spy in the U.S. since the Pollard case, while the Israeli arms industry basically sells to anyone who has cash.