Apple's new music service: Will it help curb piracy?
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Durandal
- Bile-Driven Hate Machine
- Posts: 17927
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
Apple's new music service: Will it help curb piracy?
Well Apple has just launched the iTunes Music Store, with the support of the Big 5 record labels. It works as follows:
The user can download songs for $0.99 a pop. There is no subscription.
Album downloads are $10.00 a piece (mostly).
All songs are 128 kbps AAC audio files in MP4 containers.
30-second previews are available for the user.
The user can stream the audio to a limit of three other Macs, using iTunes' ZeroConf/Rendezvous support.
The user can burn the same playlist up to 10 times, to prevent mass-distribution of a burned CD.
The user can copy the songs to an unlimited number of iPods (currently the only portable player I can think of that supports MP4).
The drawbacks:
Currently, the service only supports Macs ... and only those running OS X ... version 10.2. This makes for only a few million people who will be downloading at most, which is probably why the record labels cut the deal in the first place. It's a small testbed. I think Jobs said that they were working on Windows support, and that it would be available by the end of the year.
So, assuming this service makes it to Windows in a timely fashion, do you think it would help curb music piracy and make everyone happy due to the rather reasonable DRM in place? Do you think that, as the service becomes more popular, the record labels will demand stricter and more intrusive DRM measures?
Discuss.
The user can download songs for $0.99 a pop. There is no subscription.
Album downloads are $10.00 a piece (mostly).
All songs are 128 kbps AAC audio files in MP4 containers.
30-second previews are available for the user.
The user can stream the audio to a limit of three other Macs, using iTunes' ZeroConf/Rendezvous support.
The user can burn the same playlist up to 10 times, to prevent mass-distribution of a burned CD.
The user can copy the songs to an unlimited number of iPods (currently the only portable player I can think of that supports MP4).
The drawbacks:
Currently, the service only supports Macs ... and only those running OS X ... version 10.2. This makes for only a few million people who will be downloading at most, which is probably why the record labels cut the deal in the first place. It's a small testbed. I think Jobs said that they were working on Windows support, and that it would be available by the end of the year.
So, assuming this service makes it to Windows in a timely fashion, do you think it would help curb music piracy and make everyone happy due to the rather reasonable DRM in place? Do you think that, as the service becomes more popular, the record labels will demand stricter and more intrusive DRM measures?
Discuss.
Damien Sorresso
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
Mac fans are dedicated
I wouldn't be surprised if this takes off~ Apple also claims that AAC at 128 is better than vbr at 128
Who knows
I wouldn't be surprised if this takes off~ Apple also claims that AAC at 128 is better than vbr at 128
Who knows
"Right now we can tell you a report was filed by the family of a 12 year old boy yesterday afternoon alleging Mr. Michael Jackson of criminal activity. A search warrant has been filed and that search is currently taking place. Mr. Jackson has not been charged with any crime. We cannot specifically address the content of the police report as it is confidential information at the present time, however, we can confirm that Mr. Jackson forced the boy to listen to the Howard Stern show and watch the movie Private Parts over and over again."
- Queeb Salaron
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
- Location: Left of center.
No way will it work. Poor college kids can't afford a dollar a song, especially not when I have 1400 music files on my computer. That's $1400 bucks I wouldn't have otherwise. Fuck that, I like my Kazaa and Direct Connect. What would those Apple users get that I won't get, besides protection from lawsuits?
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
- Durandal
- Bile-Driven Hate Machine
- Posts: 17927
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
- Contact:
Guaranteed quality, download bandwidth and absense of spyware.Queeb Salaron wrote:What would those Apple users get that I won't get, besides protection from lawsuits?
Damien Sorresso
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
- Queeb Salaron
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
- Location: Left of center.
::shrugs:: I get good quality stuff. And if it happens to be bad, I can always download another version in about 10 seconds.Durandal wrote:Guaranteed quality,
I use Direct Connect on a local hub that links every computer in the school to everyone else's computer. Bandwidth ain't no thing. I dl between 800 and 1000 kB/s.download bandwidth
Quick fix: AdAware. Download it off Kazaa.and absense of spyware.
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
- Queeb Salaron
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
- Location: Left of center.
Fuck yourself. You'll get more pussy.Durran Korr wrote:Fuck you.I dl between 800 and 1000 kB/s.
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
- Wicked Pilot
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 8972
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Queeb Salaron
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: 2003-03-12 12:45am
- Location: Left of center.
[Generagion Y] What's a Mac? [/Generation Y]Wicked Pilot wrote:I think the bigger and more important question here is if anybody gives a shit about Mac any more.
Proud owner of The Fleshlight
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
G.A.L.E. Force - Bisexual Airborn Division
SDnet Resident Psycho Clown
"I hear and behold God in every object, yet I understand God not in the least, / Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself."
--Whitman
Fucking Funny.
RDF, man. RDF.Wicked Pilot wrote:I think the bigger and more important question here is if anybody gives a shit about Mac any more.
BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman
I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
- Wicked Pilot
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 8972
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
No, Reality Distortion Field. It's what Steve Jobs puts out in order to convince Mac users that their computers are faster than a P233.Wicked Pilot wrote:I too like Rarely Dressed Females, but what does this have to do about that other what's it called computer plarform?Durran Korr wrote:RDF, man. RDF.
BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman
I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
- Wicked Pilot
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 8972
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Ah, and for a second I thought it was Rabid Donkey Fuckers. I guess the WCOTC uses Winblows.Durran Korr wrote:No, Reality Distortion Field. It's what Steve Jobs puts out in order to convince Mac users that their computers are faster than a P233.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
I sense another Mac vs. PC flamewar occuring with that last silly quote (at least the part regarding the P233)Durran Korr wrote:No, Reality Distortion Field. It's what Steve Jobs puts out in order to convince Mac users that their computers are faster than a P233.Wicked Pilot wrote:I too like Rarely Dressed Females, but what does this have to do about that other what's it called computer plarform?Durran Korr wrote:RDF, man. RDF.
Re: Apple's new music service: Will it help curb piracy?
Nonono, you can run the file on up to three Macs (via DRM key) but you can stream to quite a few more (I think it was ten/machine).Durandal wrote:The user can stream the audio to a limit of three other Macs, using iTunes' ZeroConf/Rendezvous support.
It won't make a dent, IMHO. People are cheap.So, assuming this service makes it to Windows in a timely fashion, do you think it would help curb music piracy and make everyone happy due to the rather reasonable DRM in place? Do you think that, as the service becomes more popular, the record labels will demand stricter and more intrusive DRM measures?
It is kinda of a crapshot, however, especially with all of those Xing-encoded MP3s on the 'net. People don't take the time to use LAME to make good MP3s usually.Queeb Salaron wrote:::shrugs:: I get good quality stuff. And if it happens to be bad, I can always download another version in about 10 seconds.Durandal wrote:Guaranteed quality,
128kBit AAC is arguably near parity with a LAME-encoded 128kBit ABR MP3. Apple is making this claim based on the Fraunhofer MP3 codec, which isn't that good. AAC really shines at low bitrates, IMHO.Hamel wrote:Mac fans are dedicated
I wouldn't be surprised if this takes off~ Apple also claims that AAC at 128 is better than vbr at 128
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Nobody in his right mind is going to want to pay for fucking DRM files which you can't transfer freely and can't burn to make conventional CD's.
I might be able to see a dollar per song for regular MP3 files and all of the flexibility that they entail, although I suppose one could argue that it's still too much money for a college student (what a load of bullshit; they must have gotten a lot poorer since I went to school and bought hundreds of CD's with my own money).
In any case, the music industry deserves to die and be replaced by an improved offspring. In a conventional business, you must produce and keep producing all of the time. Very few businesses are based on decades of residuals for a one-off product, and most workers in conventional industries generally cannot do ONE good thing and then live the rest of their lives on that, the way musical one-hit wonders can. The exception would be patents, but they are time-limited, and anyone who seriously thinks that a song benefits humanity as much as a genuine advance in technology is deluding himself.
In any case, if free music can't be killed, then the end result is to force artists and music studios to provide more bang for the buck when they sell something (eg- replacing CD audio with DVD videos and sell them for the same price; they already make videos of all their songs anyway, for fuck's sake). But if even that is only a temporary fallback position which will be overtaken by technology eventually, then the long-term solution is to simply base their economic model on things which cannot be copied on a computer, such as the live performance experience and related merchandising.
Would this kill most of the music industry's revenue? Yes. Is this a bad thing? No. The music industry stands alone in its expectation that a healthy business should be able to:
A) Live indefinitely off of residuals for product which is made for comparatively miniscule material costs.
B) Charge such enormous profit margins that the product is sold for an order of magnitude greater than its cost.
C) Tell the customer what they can and can't do with the product once they've purchased it.
And artists seem to be living under the ridiculous expectation that once they write a song, they deserve to be able to live off it forever. If some genius invented a device which cured fucking cancer, he would only be able to live off the patent royalties for 17 years, but some idiot writes a song and he can live off it forever
In short, fuck the music companies. This is not just about being cheap; it is about seeing a business model which is based on cartel practices and having no sympathy for the fat cats who profit from it, not even the artists. Normal people have to work for 40 years to retire; an artist needs only make one good song. Boo fucking hooo for those sad artists who see people trading their music.
I might be able to see a dollar per song for regular MP3 files and all of the flexibility that they entail, although I suppose one could argue that it's still too much money for a college student (what a load of bullshit; they must have gotten a lot poorer since I went to school and bought hundreds of CD's with my own money).
In any case, the music industry deserves to die and be replaced by an improved offspring. In a conventional business, you must produce and keep producing all of the time. Very few businesses are based on decades of residuals for a one-off product, and most workers in conventional industries generally cannot do ONE good thing and then live the rest of their lives on that, the way musical one-hit wonders can. The exception would be patents, but they are time-limited, and anyone who seriously thinks that a song benefits humanity as much as a genuine advance in technology is deluding himself.
In any case, if free music can't be killed, then the end result is to force artists and music studios to provide more bang for the buck when they sell something (eg- replacing CD audio with DVD videos and sell them for the same price; they already make videos of all their songs anyway, for fuck's sake). But if even that is only a temporary fallback position which will be overtaken by technology eventually, then the long-term solution is to simply base their economic model on things which cannot be copied on a computer, such as the live performance experience and related merchandising.
Would this kill most of the music industry's revenue? Yes. Is this a bad thing? No. The music industry stands alone in its expectation that a healthy business should be able to:
A) Live indefinitely off of residuals for product which is made for comparatively miniscule material costs.
B) Charge such enormous profit margins that the product is sold for an order of magnitude greater than its cost.
C) Tell the customer what they can and can't do with the product once they've purchased it.
And artists seem to be living under the ridiculous expectation that once they write a song, they deserve to be able to live off it forever. If some genius invented a device which cured fucking cancer, he would only be able to live off the patent royalties for 17 years, but some idiot writes a song and he can live off it forever
In short, fuck the music companies. This is not just about being cheap; it is about seeing a business model which is based on cartel practices and having no sympathy for the fat cats who profit from it, not even the artists. Normal people have to work for 40 years to retire; an artist needs only make one good song. Boo fucking hooo for those sad artists who see people trading their music.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
- Einhander Sn0m4n
- Insane Railgunner
- Posts: 18630
- Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
- Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.
So, let me think here.
Option A is free and lets me do whatever I want.
Option B costs money and restricts my abilities to do what I want.
Duuuuh...
Option A is free and lets me do whatever I want.
Option B costs money and restricts my abilities to do what I want.
Duuuuh...
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
I was going to leap to the defense of the artists as copyright holders, seeing as my dream is to be a professional writer, but if the publishing industry tried to pull the same shit the music industry has, they'd deserve to go bankrupt, and at any rate, the solution for publishers if they want to prevent losing sales to file transfers is to keep publishing in a format that's difficult and time-consuming to convert into an easily copied and transfered file--i.e., books. Or, conversely, they could sell e-books, realize they're going to lose money to file-sharing, and then smile and realize how much money they've saved not having to print, bind, and distribute physical books.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
The music industry could simply revert to selling DVD-9's packed with videos and special additions and viewable lyrics and lots of other goodies. You can't burn a DVD-9 (DVD-R only goes to 4.7GB) and most people don't have a DVD-R anyway, so there would be very little piracy. Even those people who have the resources and know-how to down-compress a DVD-9 to fit on a DVD-4.7 are settling for an inferior, kludgy version which is not as good as the real thing, and the vast majority would prefer to just buy the real thing.RedImperator wrote:I was going to leap to the defense of the artists as copyright holders, seeing as my dream is to be a professional writer, but if the publishing industry tried to pull the same shit the music industry has, they'd deserve to go bankrupt, and at any rate, the solution for publishers if they want to prevent losing sales to file transfers is to keep publishing in a format that's difficult and time-consuming to convert into an easily copied and transfered file--i.e., books. Or, conversely, they could sell e-books, realize they're going to lose money to file-sharing, and then smile and realize how much money they've saved not having to print, bind, and distribute physical books.
A radical idea, eh? Actually give an unhappy customer more bang for the buck instead of trying to shaft him. Too bad the music industry would never go for it.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html