Nothing found at site of attack on Saddam.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Zoink
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2170
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:15pm
Location: Fluidic Space

Nothing found at site of attack on Saddam.

Post by Zoink »

Yahoohoo!

BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. troops have found no sign of bodies or even a bunker at the site where intelligence had said Saddam Hussein was sleeping on the war's opening night, a senior officer said Thursday.


-----------

This strengthens my comments I made on the eve of this war, that the attack on Saddam was simply a propaganda attack. IMHO: The goal of this attack was to demonstrate that the U.S. was attacking Saddam and not the Iraqi people, and would have been carried out in the complete absence of any *real* intelligence.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

I seriously doubt they fully excavated the site in a day, and it was hit with about twenty tons of penetrating high explosives. The lack of any bunker is meaningless anyway, Saddam spent the first war mostly in wood and brick houses.

Though its quite possibul he was there and that the site was evacuated on word that the attack was coming. Simple ground observers could alert the city in time to move to another location, Tomahawks have a long time of flight.

Propaganda make little sense, this attack threw away much of the shock effect of the opening campaign and expended a considerable amount of ordinance. Two F-117's could have conducted an effective propaganda attack with 80,000 dollars worth of bombs, rather then forty two million dollars worth of missiles.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Post Reply