As every professional knows communication is vital to the success of people striving for common goals, e.g. a business. Bad communication = poor performance. This is beyond pathetic. Especially the way Rumsfeld handled those questions.Iraq Shake-up Skipped Rumsfeld
Confidential Memo Was First Alert, Defense Secretary Says
By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 8, 2003; Page A10
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said yesterday that he was not told in advance about a reorganization of the Iraq reconstruction, which he heads. He said he still does not know the reason for the shake-up.
Rumsfeld said in an interview with the Financial Times and three European news organizations that he did not learn of the new Iraq Stabilization Group until he received a classified memo about it from national security adviser Condoleezza Rice on Thursday.
Rumsfeld was asked several times why the changes were necessary. "I think you have to ask Condi that question," he said, according to a transcript posted on the Web site of the Financial Times.
Pressed, he said: "I said I don't know. Isn't that clear? You don't understand English? I was not there for the backgrounding."
Rumsfeld's tart remarks offer a window on the tensions among members of President Bush's war cabinet, which are vividly described by administration officials but are rarely visible to outsiders. Rumsfeld's bluntness has occasionally rankled allies and caused headaches for the White House, but Bush is said to remain supportive.
The new group, headed by senior Rice aides at the National Security Council, gives the White House a stronger role in overseeing the reconstruction effort, which is under attack on Capitol Hill as poorly planned and unexpectedly expensive. Republican sources said the White House realizes that the consequences could be dire if the pace of the reconstruction does not improve markedly before the 2004 presidential election campaign begins.
Rumsfeld said he has not talked to Bush about the changes. When an interviewer said it sounded as though Rumsfeld had not been briefed about the changes before the memo and an interview Rice gave the New York Times, he replied, "That's true."
"She gave a background, she said what she said, and the way I read the memorandum is that it is basically what the responsibility of the NSC is and always has been, which is what's been going on," he said.
Rumsfeld said Rice's new system looks like a restatement of "the job of the National Security Council, to coordinate among different departments and agencies."
"Unfortunately, it's a classified memo. It shouldn't be. There's nothing in it that's classified," he said. "I kind of wish they'd just release the memorandum."
One source said the perception among some in the administration was that the Pentagon had been "neutered" by the changes, inasmuch as the White House now will be involved in budget and other decisions that had been the sole province of L. Paul Bremer, the civilian administrator in Iraq, who reports to Rumsfeld.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan told reporters Monday that Rumsfeld had been "very involved" in the overhaul. McClellen said last night, "This did not come as a surprise to the secretary because, as he noted in his interview, 'That is what is the charter of the National Security Council.' "
Bush's aides noted that the new group is a Washington support group for Bremer and that it was not meant to undercut him but to clear bureaucratic bottlenecks. "This is still being led by the Pentagon," McClellan said.
Donald Rumsfeld - chucking a spaz
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- BoredShirtless
- BANNED
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: 2003-02-26 10:57am
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany