What they say versus what they mean (First Debate)

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
HyperionX
Village Idiot
Posts: 390
Joined: 2004-09-29 10:27pm
Location: InDoORS

What they say versus what they mean (First Debate)

Post by HyperionX »

http://www.workingforchange.com/article ... emID=17818
What they say / what they mean (debate edition)
Reading between the lines from last week's foreign policy debate

WTS: "The Democrats are re-energized by Kerry's performance."
WTM: "Okay, maybe he's not a taller, richer, less ethnic Dukakis clone. For a while there, we were worried."

WTS: "George Bush's strengths aren't easily articulated. But his message still resonates with the American people."
WTM: "Our butts got kicked so hard, we just hope the bruises fade by the next debate."

WTS: "We're thankful America finally got to see the real John Kerry."
WTM: "We're also thankful the Senator's responses were limited by a two-minute clock."

WTS: "The foreign policy debate was Bush's issue."
WTM: "Oh dear."

WTS: "I don't care who has the better debating skills. I still think George Bush is the more decisive candidate."
WTM: "I would vote for a footstool before a Democrat."

WTS: "I thought the debate was a tie."
WTM: "I was really watching Extreme Makeover."

WTS: "John Kerry definitely appeared more statesman-like."
WTM: "He's taller."

WTS: "Sending mixed messages isn't good for our troops or our allies or for the Iraqi people."
WTM: "Logic complicates things."

WTS: "George Bush has waged the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time."
WTM: "This would be a hell of a lot easier if I knew when I said what in front of whom."

WTS: "I was provided with faulty intelligence."
WTM: "DNA is a bitch."

WTS: "Every one of the President's reasons to go to war have been proven to be fabricated."
WTM: "I can't believe I'm losing to this twit."

WTS: "It's hard work. We're working hard."
WTM: "Are my two minutes up yet?"

WTS: "Our only chance to succeed in Iraq is to build a new coalition."
WTM: "I speak French."

WTS: "The administration at this time has no plans to re-institute the draft."
WTM: "This is a permanent policy that will last right up until after the election."

WTS: "I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it."
WTM: "And I would do it again in a heartbeat. And not do it again as well."

WTS: "The economy's turned the corner."
WTM: "Then it rolled twelve times, hit a tree and burst into flames."

WTS: "I know what it's like to follow hollow orders for empty aspirations."
WTM: "Bronze Star, Silver Star and three Purple Hearts."

WTS: "Freedom is on the march."
WTM: "Not necessarily marching forward."

WTS: "I made a mistake talking about the war. He made a mistake going to war. Which is worst?"
WTM: "Don't answer that question."

WTS: "The Iraqi people hunger for democracy."
WTM: "As long as it doesn't include heretical covenants like women driving and stuff like that."

WTS: "Bilateral talks are better than multilateral talks."
WTM: "I'm going to blind him with fancy negotiation-speak."

WTS: "I know Saddam had nothing to do with 911. I know that."
WTM: "All those swarthy sand jockeys look the same to Americans."
That sounds about right :lol:.
"Hey, genius, evolution isn't science. That's why its called a theory." -A Fundie named HeroofPellinor
"If it was a proven fact, there wouldn't be any controversy. That's why its called a 'Theory'"-CaptainChewbacca[img=left]http://www.jasoncoleman.net/wp-images/b ... irefox.png[/img][img=left]http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/4226 ... ll42ew.png[/img]
User avatar
Darth Raptor
Red Mage
Posts: 5448
Joined: 2003-12-18 03:39am

Re: What they say versus what they mean (First Debate)

Post by Darth Raptor »

WTS: "I was provided with faulty intelligence."
WTM: "DNA is a bitch."
WTS: "The economy's turned the corner."
WTM: "Then it rolled twelve times, hit a tree and burst into flames."
These two are absolutely priceless. :lol:
User avatar
White Cat
Padawan Learner
Posts: 212
Joined: 2002-08-29 03:48pm
Location: A thousand km from the centre of the universe
Contact:

Post by White Cat »

WTS: "Bilateral talks are better than multilateral talks."
WTM: "I'm going to blind him with fancy negotiation-speak."
Which one said this?
LISTEN TO MY LOUSY ANIME SONG
User avatar
The Kernel
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2003-09-17 02:31am
Location: Kweh?!

Post by The Kernel »

White Cat wrote:
WTS: "Bilateral talks are better than multilateral talks."
WTM: "I'm going to blind him with fancy negotiation-speak."
Which one said this?
Bush, he seemed to think that Bilateral talks in the NK situation gave the US more leverage since we can more easily control such a situation. Obviously he failed to grasp the purpose behind multilateral talks in the first place.
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

The Kernel wrote:
White Cat wrote:
WTS: "Bilateral talks are better than multilateral talks."
WTM: "I'm going to blind him with fancy negotiation-speak."
Which one said this?
Bush, he seemed to think that Bilateral talks in the NK situation gave the US more leverage since we can more easily control such a situation. Obviously he failed to grasp the purpose behind multilateral talks in the first place.
You've got that backwards, dude. Kerry wants bilateral talks, while Bush refuses to talk to North Korea without the Chinese and Russians at the table. It's one of the few issues where Bush is dead right and Kerry is dead wrong.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
The Kernel
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2003-09-17 02:31am
Location: Kweh?!

Post by The Kernel »

RedImperator wrote: You've got that backwards, dude. Kerry wants bilateral talks, while Bush refuses to talk to North Korea without the Chinese and Russians at the table. It's one of the few issues where Bush is dead right and Kerry is dead wrong.
Excuse me I mispoke, I meant that Bush wants unilateral talks while Kerry wants bilateral/multilateral talks. And actually, I would tend to agree with Kerry on this since neither China, Russia, Japan or South Korea wants NK to have nuclear weapons. I'm not that familiar with the talks but what exactly is the rational behind unilateral talks?
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Post by salm »

RedImperator wrote: You've got that backwards, dude. Kerry wants bilateral talks, while Bush refuses to talk to North Korea without the Chinese and Russians at the table. It's one of the few issues where Bush is dead right and Kerry is dead wrong.
yeah, how exactly does kerry get to that conclusion? it seems so much like a thing bush would support.
User avatar
Iceberg
ASVS Master of Laundry
Posts: 4068
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:23am
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by Iceberg »

salm wrote:
RedImperator wrote: You've got that backwards, dude. Kerry wants bilateral talks, while Bush refuses to talk to North Korea without the Chinese and Russians at the table. It's one of the few issues where Bush is dead right and Kerry is dead wrong.
yeah, how exactly does kerry get to that conclusion? it seems so much like a thing bush would support.
You realize that everybody BUT the US is having bilateral talks with NK while the multilateral talks are going on, right?
"Carriers dispense fighters, which dispense assbeatings." - White Haven

| Hyperactive Gundam Pilot of MM | GALE | ASVS | Cleaners | Kibologist (beable) | DFB |
If only one rock and roll song echoes into tomorrow
There won't be anything to keep you from the distant morning glow.
I'm not a man. I just portrayed one for 15 years.
Post Reply