More on sex bomb: "We wern't gonna do it"

[Lord Zentei]

This topic has just about scrolled offscreen, so in an effort to avoid necromancy here is a link to it...

...and a futher link to the news.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. military rejected a 1994 proposal to develop an "aphrodisiac" to spur homosexual activity among enemy troops but is hard at work on other less-than-lethal weapons, defense officials said Sunday.

The idea of fostering homosexuality among the enemy figured in a declassified six-year, $7.5 million request from a laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio for funding of non-lethal chemical weapon research.

The proposal, disclosed in response to a Freedom of Information request, called for developing chemicals affecting human behavior "so that discipline and morale in enemy units is adversely affected."

"One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior," said the document, obtained by the Sunshine Project.

The watchdog group posted the partly blacked-out, three-page document on its Web site.

Lt. Col. Barry Venable of the Army, a Defense Department spokesman, said: "This suggestion arose essentially from a brainstorming session, and it was rejected out of hand."

The Air Force Research Laboratory also suggested using chemicals that could be sprayed on enemy positions to attract stinging and biting bugs, rodents and larger animals.

Another idea involved creating "severe and lasting halitosis" to help sniff out fighters trying to blend with civilians.

The U.S. military remains committed to developing less-than-lethal weapons that pass stringent legal reviews and are consistent with international treaties, said Captain Dan McSweeny of the Marine Corps, a spokesman for the Pentagon unit spearheading their introduction.

"We feel it's very important to offer our deployed service members and their commanders a greater range of options in dealing with increasingly complex operational environments," said McSweeny, of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate.

The pentagon must have gotten quite a lot of critique from both left and right after the earlier story broke. And they seem to have some brains after all... I don't know wether to be releived or disapointed.

[Illuminatus Primus]

The bitching about it is pure PC, critiquing over minutae, bullshit. From a purely pragmatic perspective, such a hypothetical may have genuine effectiveness and is not inappropriate to mention in brainstorming.

[Rye]

What I don't get is why they'd think it'd be a detriment to morale, in various armies throughout history, the soldiers fucking one another relieved tension and created a closer bond between them. Other than the distraction it would cause in the short term, I don't think it'd be that effective in demoralising. Sure, it sounds bad in principle if you're a product of a society that thinks it's not really acceptable, but in a warzone the more animal realities of it will sink in.