Which one to play first?

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » 2004-11-18 06:01pm

I got both Vampire: The Masquerade Redemption and Command and Conquer: Generals but I can't make up my mind which one to play first.

Which one would you suggest?

Arthur_Tuxedo · Post by **Arthur_Tuxedo** » 2004-11-18 07:14pm

I found V:tMR to be very enjoyable. Haven't played Generals enough to vouch for or against it, though.

Ma Deuce · Post by **Ma Deuce** » 2004-11-18 08:21pm

The campaign for Generals is very fun the first few times: too short for my tastes, and with little story connecting the missions, but still loads of fun (playing as China is the most fun, for their flame weapons, nukes, and Overlord tanks)

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-11-18 08:28pm

Command & Conquer.

Ace Pace · Post by **Ace Pace** » 2004-11-19 09:52am

Rogue 9 wrote:Command & Conquer.

Echoed.

No RPG matchs the sheer crazyness of walking a bunch of arab halftracks into a street, then bunkering it with AT men.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2004-11-19 10:21am

Vampire because I already played Generals in your case however you'll probably get more milage out of Vampire then Generals

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » 2004-11-19 07:05pm

Thanks! Now to conquer!

Soontir C'boath · Post by **Soontir C'boath** » 2004-11-19 07:11pm

Play Generals first, then you'll get tired of it sooner or later as I have and then it'll be endless fun for your other game.

SecondStorm · Post by **SecondStorm** » 2004-11-19 07:35pm

Ive played both.

Generals without Zero Hour was mediocre.

V:TR would take alot more of your time and IMO more enjoyable but you have to be a player/fan of Vampire the Masquerade or else you'll lose alot of flavour.
And remember to get the patch! V:TR without that patch is damn near impossible to play because of a huge amount of bugs.