Intel is coming back...

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Post Reply
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Intel is coming back...

Post by Ace Pace »

Anandtech.com linky

Amazing, we're talking anywhere from 20% improvement to 40%.

Lets try hotlinking them.

Image

Image
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

And the chip test I read a couple weeks ago had AMD spanking Intel in every catagory, especialy games. And they were testing the highest of the high end.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

Alyeska wrote:And the chip test I read a couple weeks ago had AMD spanking Intel in every catagory, especialy games. And they were testing the highest of the high end.
Chip test where? With what CPUs?

Let me guess, a currently out Pentium D?

Let me clarify: Conroe is not out yet, Conroe is pre-production sillicon to be released at the middle of this year, with a completly new architecture(yes, I know its not 100% new).
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Alyeska wrote:And the chip test I read a couple weeks ago had AMD spanking Intel in every catagory, especialy games. And they were testing the highest of the high end.
They were probably testing high-end Pentium D/EE processors; this appears to be the first public Conroe benchmark but under blackbox conditions. Benchmark cooking is a long tradition but 20% gain over K8 is very reasonable (I'd be shocked if Intel didn't deliver on those gains).
Ace Pace wrote:Let me clarify: Conroe is not out yet, Conroe is pre-production sillicon to be released at the middle of this year, with a completly new architecture(yes, I know its not 100% new).
Intel Core Microarchitecture (P7?) is supposedly an entirely new design but strongly influenced from the Pentium M line.
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

phongn wrote: They were probably testing high-end Pentium D/EE processors; this appears to be the first public Conroe benchmark but under blackbox conditions. Benchmark cooking is a long tradition but 20% gain over K8 is very reasonable (I'd be shocked if Intel didn't deliver on those gains).
Wouldn't the fact that these X2 benchs match previously recorded numbers taken from the X2 pretty much deny cooking?
Intel Core Microarchitecture (P7?) is supposedly an entirely new design but strongly influenced from the Pentium M line.
Yes, influenced actully by both the Pentium M and the Netburst, from what I understand they are trying to take the best of both worlds.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Ace Pace wrote:Wouldn't the fact that these X2 benchs match previously recorded numbers taken from the X2 pretty much deny cooking?
Intel could have done some tuning voodoo with Conroe one way or another.
Yes, influenced actully by both the Pentium M and the Netburst, from what I understand they are trying to take the best of both worlds.
Yes, but there are other features of it not seen in either P6 or P4.
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

phongn wrote:
Ace Pace wrote:Wouldn't the fact that these X2 benchs match previously recorded numbers taken from the X2 pretty much deny cooking?
Intel could have done some tuning voodoo with Conroe one way or another.
How would they go around doing that?
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Arrow
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2003-01-12 09:14pm

Post by Arrow »

I wonder how AMD's next big thing stacks up against Conroe.
Artillery. Its what's for dinner.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

AnandTech has some more details about Conroe in their Spring IDF 2006 article
Ace Pace wrote:How would they go around doing that?
No real clue, honestly :P
Arrow wrote:I wonder how AMD's next big thing stacks up against Conroe.
K8 is moving to DDR2, which has greater bandwidth but also greater latency. No major core revisions are planned for the near future, AFAIK.
Post Reply