AMD Phenom is a gigantic dissapointment

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

User avatar
The Kernel
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2003-09-17 02:31am
Location: Kweh?!

Post by The Kernel »

Durandal wrote: Even when Intel was on top of the speed wars, they never had an architecture that was so cradle-to-the-grave as Core. Intel has one architecture that annihilates the mobile competition in terms of performance per Watt, outperforms AMD's best offerings on the desktop and still has plenty of room to grow.

What Intel's got right now is basically a perfect storm. They have the clearly superior architecture, gigantic amounts of money to keep that architecture going and the fab resources to pump them out and take advantage of economies of scale. It's kind of a shame that they're doing so well at systematically destroying the competition, because that means no more CPU wars.
Indeed, and they show no signs of slowing down. Their next generation core Nehalem (which has already been publically displayed by Intel over a year before launch) seeks to bring eight cores, 16-way SMT, on-die memory controller and the elimination of the FSB to be replaced with a serial interconnect similar to Hyper Transport. Overnight they will eliminate any trace of AMD advantage that is left (meager as it might be).

Furthermore, these are only the details about Nehalem that we know about at this point, which are still not complete. Rumors of an integrated GPU (derivative of the Larrabee x86 graphics processor) and more are swirling about along with further advancements to the hardware virtualization system.

Heck, Intel even recently signed a MOU with Rambus to potentially license XDR, which would give them a serious boost in memory technology (Rambus may have been a bust for the P4, but the technology is still very sound, especially in the XDR variety).
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

I'm being pedantic, but that's 2-way SMT, since it's accounted for on a per-core basis, usually.
User avatar
The Kernel
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2003-09-17 02:31am
Location: Kweh?!

Post by The Kernel »

phongn wrote:I'm being pedantic, but that's 2-way SMT, since it's accounted for on a per-core basis, usually.
Ack, I swear I thought that while I was writing "16-way SMT" but for some reason I didn't correct it. ;)
User avatar
atg
Jedi Master
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2005-04-20 09:23pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by atg »

Its a real shame to see AMD go this way. If they can keep the prices low like now, they can survive in terms of sales, but whether AMD can afford to keep the prices low is the real question.

With the Phenoms being compatible with AM2+ motherboards, I'll probably upgrade to a Phenom processor when I tire of my 6000+ only because it'll be cheaper than having to buy a new motherboard.
Marcus Aurelius: ...the Swedish S-tank; the exception is made mostly because the Swedes insisted really hard that it is a tank rather than a tank destroyer or assault gun
Ilya Muromets: And now I have this image of a massive, stern-looking Swede staring down a bunch of military nerds. "It's a tank." "Uh, yes Sir. Please don't hurt us."
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

The Kernel wrote:Ack, I swear I thought that while I was writing "16-way SMT" but for some reason I didn't correct it. ;)
You know, in theory that means Windows XP could be running on a 32-threading machine? ( Two 8-core Nehelam with 2-way SMT)
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

fusion wrote:Ohh, if you are going to play that way here is something better:
5.5GHz
Core 2.
You're on, 8GHZ.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
The Kernel
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7438
Joined: 2003-09-17 02:31am
Location: Kweh?!

Post by The Kernel »

phongn wrote:
The Kernel wrote:Ack, I swear I thought that while I was writing "16-way SMT" but for some reason I didn't correct it. ;)
You know, in theory that means Windows XP could be running on a 32-threading machine? ( Two 8-core Nehelam with 2-way SMT)
Christ, I've GOT to see the task manager CPU utilization graphs on that one. :D
Post Reply