Lock On: Modern Air Combat
Moderator: Thanas
Lock On: Modern Air Combat
So, I'm thinking of getting this flight sim. Does anyone else here own it? If so, I'd like some opinions before decide to buy it. The screenshots I've seen of LOMAC look quite impressive, and I've heard the realism is also top-notch. However, I'd appreciate some feedback from people who have actually played it before I make my decision...Thanks in advance.
The M2HB: The Greatest Machinegun Ever Made.
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke
"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke
"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
- lukexcom
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 2003-01-04 03:49am
- Location: Ah, Northern Virginia. The lone island of stability in an ocean of recession.
- Contact:
The realism is quite good. It's not as top-notch as Falcon 4.0 (after you implement a myriad of community-developed "fixes" developed over the years) but it's quite good.
The graphics require some very powerful equipment. Heck, nobody can maximize the water reflectivity detail and keep over 20fps in 12x9 right now. The sim was designed for future systems in mind.
Most bugs have gone away, there are still some issues like an underpowered ECM burn-through feature on the F-15's radar, or the AMRAAMs having their range a bit short, but that's being fixed in patch 1.02, due out any day now.
I have it. I really like it. And I'd recommend it. It's great.
The graphics require some very powerful equipment. Heck, nobody can maximize the water reflectivity detail and keep over 20fps in 12x9 right now. The sim was designed for future systems in mind.
Most bugs have gone away, there are still some issues like an underpowered ECM burn-through feature on the F-15's radar, or the AMRAAMs having their range a bit short, but that's being fixed in patch 1.02, due out any day now.
I have it. I really like it. And I'd recommend it. It's great.
-Luke
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
It's a fun game to play, both the Air to Air and Air to Ground. The realism is pretty good with pretty realistic radar, EW, weapons and flight performance for each plane (though wimps can switch off things like G forces and turn on a birds eye view radar if they can't handle it).
The biggest problem for me personally is that there are few differences between the Su-27 and 33/MiG-29A and S. I would have preffered different varients (plus a third US plane). Of course, you've got the pure coolness of the A-10/Su-25.
If you like modern day combat flight sims, (as oppossed to Il-2:FB) I'd recomend it.
The biggest problem for me personally is that there are few differences between the Su-27 and 33/MiG-29A and S. I would have preffered different varients (plus a third US plane). Of course, you've got the pure coolness of the A-10/Su-25.
If you like modern day combat flight sims, (as oppossed to Il-2:FB) I'd recomend it.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
Highly recommended. The Su-25 is a joy to fly. Too bad I can't seem to comprehend the steam guage navigation equipment, no matter how hard I try.
Well, they didn't really have much choice; the Su-27, MiG-29 and MiG-29S are the only eligible variants actually in Russian service; and they are designed with commonality in avionics in mind, for ease of pilot conversion. I quite like the MiG-29S. The R-77 AMRAAMskis are fun to use.The biggest problem for me personally is that there are few differences between the Su-27 and 33/MiG-29A and S. I would have preffered different varients (plus a third US plane).
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Alright then, I've decided I will get it...
Thanks for the input
Thanks for the input
The M2HB: The Greatest Machinegun Ever Made.
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke
"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
HAB: Crew-Served Weapons Specialist
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." --P.J. O'Rourke
"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." --J.S. Mill
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK