[STGOD] Preliminary Force Declarations & Rules

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

SirNitram wrote:
I'd love to see a Roman patrol ship try to say that to a Generation Ship... :lol:
I don't expect the lost would want to risk them in combat however
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
SirNitram wrote:
I'd love to see a Roman patrol ship try to say that to a Generation Ship... :lol:
I don't expect the lost would want to risk them in combat however
No, but they do tend to wander like senile old men.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Beowulf
The Patrician
Posts: 10621
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:18am
Location: 32ULV

Post by Beowulf »

The OU would respond with asking the generation ship to leave politely, and then not so politely, and then definitely not politely, then would come the warning shot.
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
User avatar
Thirdfain
The Player of Games
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2003-02-13 09:24pm
Location: Never underestimate the staggering drawing power of the Garden State.

Post by Thirdfain »

Why? It's not like the Lost are invading or anything- acts of aggression against those who peacefully share the freedom of the Void would certainly assure that the fleets defending the Lost would be augmented by Floater warships.
Image

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

Thirdfain wrote:Why? It's not like the Lost are invading or anything- acts of aggression against those who peacefully share the freedom of the Void would certainly assure that the fleets defending the Lost would be augmented by Floater warships.
Pretty much. The Lost won't intentionally piss people off with those ships, but it's not like they'll turn these slow-as-molasses ships around and add weeks to transit time because someone refuses to allow basic right of passage. And besides, it would rapidly become clear antagonizing one is generally unwise: It's impossible to tell how many ships are escorting it while under cloak, and it's doubtful most patrol ships can really do anything but look intimidating at it.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

So long as the Lost stay within their assigned space lanes and keep their weapons locked down while transiting across Reynari space, and pay the nominal transit fee, the Empire would have no problem granting passage rights to any Lost mothership seeking to cross Reynari space. You will understand, however, that possessing cloaked warships within our space will be viewed as an unfriendly act. The warships will be allowed to cross if they take a Reynari observer on board, run without cloaks, and keep their weapons locked down. Otherwise, they can go around Reynari space while the motherships cross--the Reynari Empire does not attack unarmed civilians, so there's no need to send those escorts through our space to begin with.

As for the Floaters, if they find themselves, through a change in borders, within Reynari territory, they will acknowledge the right of the Matriarch to rule over them or they will leave. We will not have our domestic policy dictated to us by anyone, let alone a pack of nomads with no proper state.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Pablo Sanchez
Commissar
Posts: 6998
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
Location: The Wasteland

Post by Pablo Sanchez »

Straha wrote:Excuse me for becoming slightly angered here, but the civil war I was trying to portray was relativley peaceful, with the government allowing those that wanted out, out, and those that didn't want out could stay in.
That doesn't make sense. Do you understand how amazingly charged matters of ethnicity are? You're talking about a single Catholic, Western-European ethnic group ruling over the entire rest of the world. There will be gaffes, there will be misunderstandings, and there is no way that it is going to disintegrate without violence.

Shi Huang Di had to burn books, mass-execute opposing scholars, and institute a nation-wide informer network to rule China effectively--and that was with a single ethnic group and a population in the millions. What you're trying to depict is, simply put, impossible.
The brilliant general could fit in with any military action, but troops firing into crowds would not even be concieved of (the military recognizes its purpose is to serve the people, that's why the declare independence from the government with their teritories) by anyone in the army.
I'd like to point out that there is, literally speaking, absolutely no way in Heaven, Earth, or Hell that Monaco and Andorra could conquer and hold a world-wide empire without brutal violence. The concept of them doing this at all is difficult enough...
Secondly according to my original description and timeline the civil war took place in 2350, not 2250...
Simple error of addition, easily corrected.
Image
"I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war."
--The Lord Humungus
User avatar
Thirdfain
The Player of Games
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2003-02-13 09:24pm
Location: Never underestimate the staggering drawing power of the Garden State.

Post by Thirdfain »

As for the Floaters, if they find themselves, through a change in borders, within Reynari territory, they will acknowledge the right of the Matriarch to rule over them or they will leave. We will not have our domestic policy dictated to us by anyone, let alone a pack of nomads with no proper state.
And we don't recognize the rule of archaic despots! Failure to observe the native right of all sentient life to freedom from despotic rule without consent will earn you the hatred of all those who accept the liberty of the void. Systems which allow their floater populace their few, simple, native rights will earn the friendship (and military support) of the great industrialised Clusters. Those who would seek to destroy those native rights will earn the enmity of all floaters, from clusters both large and small.

Besides, few nonmilitary Floater vessels mount superlightspeed drives. We can't leave.
Image

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

SirNitram wrote:
Pretty much. The Lost won't intentionally piss people off with those ships, but it's not like they'll turn these slow-as-molasses ships around and add weeks to transit time because someone refuses to allow basic right of passage. And besides, it would rapidly become clear antagonizing one is generally unwise: It's impossible to tell how many ships are escorting it while under cloak, and it's doubtful most patrol ships can really do anything but look intimidating at it.
Course, the odds of such a force actually entering another system are basically non-existent unless they intentionally do so, and I doubt anyone would really care otherwise. With only a few systems at most in any powers hand, no ones going to be claiming vast areas of deep space.

I do however have a problem with claiming a perfect cloak, those didn't exist in DS9.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
SirNitram wrote:
Pretty much. The Lost won't intentionally piss people off with those ships, but it's not like they'll turn these slow-as-molasses ships around and add weeks to transit time because someone refuses to allow basic right of passage. And besides, it would rapidly become clear antagonizing one is generally unwise: It's impossible to tell how many ships are escorting it while under cloak, and it's doubtful most patrol ships can really do anything but look intimidating at it.
Course, the odds of such a force actually entering another system are basically non-existent unless they intentionally do so, and I doubt anyone would really care otherwise. With only a few systems at most in any powers hand, no ones going to be claiming vast areas of deep space.

I do however have a problem with claiming a perfect cloak, those didn't exist in DS9.
Not perfect, no, but it becomes very hard to accurately track how many ships are around a Generation Ship and cloaked, especially since some will be Phase-Cloaked.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

I'm afraid I'll be bowing out of this before it starts up so I don't cause any trouble. I don't think I should be obligated to something of this magnitude until I see how it works better.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Consideration of territory in the STGOD

Should entire systems be considered "land" insomuch as their owning powers can allow or deny free passage through them? Certainly, they are rather small things compared to the great space around them, but some might argue that indeed, only the planets and stations (and a certain radius around them) are actually belonging to someone.

How should we define territory and international space?
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

Thirdfain wrote:And we don't recognize the rule of archaic despots! Failure to observe the native right of all sentient life to freedom from despotic rule without consent will earn you the hatred of all those who accept the liberty of the void. Systems which allow their floater populace their few, simple, native rights will earn the friendship (and military support) of the great industrialised Clusters. Those who would seek to destroy those native rights will earn the enmity of all floaters, from clusters both large and small.

Besides, few nonmilitary Floater vessels mount superlightspeed drives. We can't leave.
We would be happy to provide transit for those unwilling to accept the few restrictions that would be placed upon them and the small taxes imposed in exchange for a place in the Imperium.

You would be wise, Floater, to cease threatening sovereign nations. We will enforce our law within our territory and we will not tolerate interference from outside powers.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Thirdfain
The Player of Games
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2003-02-13 09:24pm
Location: Never underestimate the staggering drawing power of the Garden State.

Post by Thirdfain »

We would be happy to provide transit for those unwilling to accept the few restrictions that would be placed upon them and the small taxes imposed in exchange for a place in the Imperium.

You would be wise, Floater, to cease threatening sovereign nations. We will enforce our law within our territory and we will not tolerate interference from outside powers.
How does owning a few tiny peices of atmosphere-swabbled rock in a system give you the right to declare the huge area around it as your own? Space is free.

Should entire systems be considered "land" insomuch as their owning powers can allow or deny free passage through them? Certainly, they are rather small things compared to the great space around them, but some might argue that indeed, only the planets and stations (and a certain radius around them) are actually belonging to someone.

How should we define territory and international space?
I think we need to treat space like modern powers treat the ocean. Any planet which is owned by a single faction has a buffer zone of space around it which belongs to the planet's owners, and the rest of the system is International Territory. Obviously, emipres can place legal claims on resources in a system, but allowing the ownership of a single world in a system to convey complete control over that system is ridiculous.

Planets with mixed ownership, like Earth would probably have to make special arrangements. Anyone have any ideas?
Last edited by Thirdfain on 2003-04-22 11:37pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )
User avatar
Beowulf
The Patrician
Posts: 10621
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:18am
Location: 32ULV

Post by Beowulf »

I think the territorial limit should extend to the edge of the heliopause of a given star, which for a Sol like star, has been estimated at 110 AU.
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Post by RedImperator »

phongn wrote:Consideration of territory in the STGOD

Should entire systems be considered "land" insomuch as their owning powers can allow or deny free passage through them? Certainly, they are rather small things compared to the great space around them, but some might argue that indeed, only the planets and stations (and a certain radius around them) are actually belonging to someone.

How should we define territory and international space?
If a power is in control of all the inhabitable territory within a system, then I think that power can claim control of the entire star system. I was planning on claiming the four inhabited star systems and a sphere of space around the home system as Reynari space and I intend to enforce those borders. This issue could actually make for a possible flashpoint in the STGOD.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Whole systems should be consider territory, with the outer limits being well beyond effective weapons range. Basically we'd end up with huge elliptical areas, very wide and long but not extended all that far above and below the orbits of a systems planets.

Earth does need special arrangements no matter what.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Thirdfain wrote:
How does owning a few tiny peices of atmosphere-swabbled rock in a system give you the right to declare the huge area around it as your own? Space is free.
Or so your form of world less scum would wish it would be. Security concerns and the range of modern weapons make anything less unacceptable.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Thirdfain
The Player of Games
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2003-02-13 09:24pm
Location: Never underestimate the staggering drawing power of the Garden State.

Post by Thirdfain »

On second thought, you are right- all it takes is one q-ship loaded down with mass drivers or some other nasty kinetic weapon, get within a dozen AUs and you can bomb a planet into the stone age.

The original law for a nation's controlled water was one mile- the range of naval artillary at the time of the first maritime law. Let's work out a max range for strategic weapons, and use that as the controlled area around a planet.
Image

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )
User avatar
Beowulf
The Patrician
Posts: 10621
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:18am
Location: 32ULV

Post by Beowulf »

Sea Skimmer wrote:Whole systems should be consider territory, with the outer limits being well beyond effective weapons range. Basically we'd end up with huge elliptical areas, very wide and long but not extended all that far above and below the orbits of a systems planets.

Earth does need special arrangements no matter what.
What if you're system has rather odd ball orbits for it's planets?

I think a spherical volume would be better.
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
User avatar
Seggybop
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1954
Joined: 2002-07-20 07:09pm
Location: USA

Post by Seggybop »

Thirdfain wrote:Let's work out a max range for strategic weapons, and use that as the controlled area around a planet.
An FTL cruise missile could attack from any range.
my heart is a shell of depleted uranium
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

Thirdfain wrote:On second thought, you are right- all it takes is one q-ship loaded down with mass drivers or some other nasty kinetic weapon, get within a dozen AUs and you can bomb a planet into the stone age.

The original law for a nation's controlled water was one mile- the range of naval artillary at the time of the first maritime law. Let's work out a max range for strategic weapons, and use that as the controlled area around a planet.
Then whoever controls whatever colony is present in a system(Be it traditional planetary control, a Floater asteroid home, or a Lost Orbital), controls the system and it's Heliopause, dictating law within that region. Sound fair to everyone?
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Beowulf
The Patrician
Posts: 10621
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:18am
Location: 32ULV

Post by Beowulf »

SirNitram wrote:
Thirdfain wrote:On second thought, you are right- all it takes is one q-ship loaded down with mass drivers or some other nasty kinetic weapon, get within a dozen AUs and you can bomb a planet into the stone age.

The original law for a nation's controlled water was one mile- the range of naval artillary at the time of the first maritime law. Let's work out a max range for strategic weapons, and use that as the controlled area around a planet.
Then whoever controls whatever colony is present in a system(Be it traditional planetary control, a Floater asteroid home, or a Lost Orbital), controls the system and it's Heliopause, dictating law within that region. Sound fair to everyone?
What if there's more than one colony in a given system?
"preemptive killing of cops might not be such a bad idea from a personal saftey[sic] standpoint..." --Keevan Colton
"There's a word for bias you can't see: Yours." -- William Saletan
User avatar
Thirdfain
The Player of Games
Posts: 6924
Joined: 2003-02-13 09:24pm
Location: Never underestimate the staggering drawing power of the Garden State.

Post by Thirdfain »

An FTL cruise missile could attack from any range.
I'm pretty sure that every FTL system we are using in this STGOD either
A. Is easy to detect when in action, or
B. is restricted to operationg outside of a planet's garvity well.

Inert projectiles coming in at fractional C would be harder to detect.
Image

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
John Kenneth Galbraith (1908 - )
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Thirdfain wrote:On second thought, you are right- all it takes is one q-ship loaded down with mass drivers or some other nasty kinetic weapon, get within a dozen AUs and you can bomb a planet into the stone age.

The original law for a nation's controlled water was one mile- the range of naval artillary at the time of the first maritime law. Let's work out a max range for strategic weapons, and use that as the controlled area around a planet.
One mile, then three miles, then seventeen miles, twenty two now IIRC, with the addition of a 200 mile economic exclusion zone with areas well beyound that often claimed.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Post Reply