Page 1 of 1
Looking for an mp3 player
Posted: 2006-12-10 04:58pm
by Tolya
Hey, Im looking for an mp3 player. Its a christmas gift for my fiancee.
- Must be reliable and well built. We had bad experiences in the past with some mp3 players (cheapest ones really), which worked for about a month and then broke.
- Capacity is not that important. Anything above 256mb will do.
- Must have a pendrive feature (but I imagine all do)
- Radio receiver is a very welcome feature.
Posted: 2006-12-10 05:03pm
by Bounty
Creative. I don't know what the current must-have line is but check their website and you'll find what you need.
ETA: the
ZEN, perhaps, or maybe a
ZEN Nano Plus
Posted: 2006-12-10 08:05pm
by Praxis
iPod Shuffle, otherwise, the Creative Zen Nano Plus.
Don't bother with anything else.
Posted: 2006-12-11 04:25am
by Bounty
Praxis wrote:iPod Shuffle
I would not spend a cent on a music player that doesn't even have a screen.
Posted: 2006-12-11 04:31am
by Stark
Bounty wrote:I would not spend a cent on a music player that doesn't even have a screen.
Yeah, because it's not designed for people who use music while jogging/working out etc and can't see the screen anyway! When I had an old SD card MP3 player, it had a display... and it was WORTHLESS, since I only ever used random anyway. I wouldn't miss it, particularly if it gives better batterylife, smaller footprint, and made it cheaper.
Posted: 2006-12-11 04:35am
by Bounty
Stark wrote:Bounty wrote:I would not spend a cent on a music player that doesn't even have a screen.
Yeah, because it's not designed for people who use music while jogging/working out etc and can't see the screen anyway! When I had an old SD card MP3 player, it had a display... and it was WORTHLESS, since I only ever used random anyway. I wouldn't miss it, particularly if it gives better batterylife, smaller footprint, and made it cheaper.
Shuffle battery life: 12 hours
Nano Plus battery life: 18 hours
Shuffle price, 1 gig: $79.99
Nano Plus price, 1 gig: $69.95
You were saying?
Posted: 2006-12-11 04:41am
by Stark
Yeah, because I own a shuffle, and I'm trying to change your mind, right?
I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
Course, the Nano Plus *does* need a screen for it's FM tuning. Even if it appears it's incredibly small.
Posted: 2006-12-11 04:49am
by Bounty
I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
To be honest, you're the first person I've ever heard saying you don't need a screen. I used to have a Creative Muvo with a tiny screen and I can't imagine how I could have managed without it. Equalizer settings and FM tuning has to be a complete bitch when you try to do it blind.
Posted: 2006-12-11 06:45am
by Tolya
Im going for a Creative then. I too cant imagine setting up the equalizer and FM without a screen.
Plus here in Poland Creative is a LOT cheaper than iPod. About 20$ of difference.
Posted: 2006-12-11 08:05am
by Lazarus
I bought a Creative MuVoTX Nomad 512 about a year and a half ago, and its still in ok working order now (the battery plate has lost its staying-in-ability so sellotape is needed, and the headphones have just died, but otherwise its fine). I paid £60 for it then, I'm sure its cheaper now, but to be honest I'd recommend paying a bit more and getting a larger one.
Posted: 2006-12-11 04:32pm
by Master of Ossus
Stark wrote:I'm simply saying that 'loller no screen' is retarded, since the crappy screens many mp3 players have are useless anyway. Unless they're full-navigation stuff like the larger players, it's hardly a huge sacrifice, certainly not instant death as you claim.
Even if it's not a feature that you find useful, I find his analysis compelling. It's clearly not wasting batteries too much, and it's not costly, so if it's even a non-issue (as opposed to an inconvenience) then it's the better deal.
Posted: 2006-12-11 05:52pm
by Stark
Master of Ossus wrote:Even if it's not a feature that you find useful, I find his analysis compelling. It's clearly not wasting batteries too much, and it's not costly, so if it's even a non-issue (as opposed to an inconvenience) then it's the better deal.
Let it never be said I think the Shuffle is worth buying.
However, small mp3 players just don't need one, as the overhead for a 'proper' screen is too high and all the screen says is 'this is the song you can hear' and 'this is how loud it is, that thing you're hearing'. Like I said, the Creative has a tuner, so it actually needs one, and the Shuffle is inferior in all respects except size. However, EQ settings on small mp3 players doesn't sound like something you're going to be changing all the time: does anyone actually change their EQ preset on a song-by-song basis without just using ID3 tags to do it for you?
Posted: 2006-12-13 04:41pm
by Tolya
I received a Creative Zen Nano today, following Bounty's advice. Thanks for help guys.