Vista Gaming Performance

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Post Reply
User avatar
Arrow
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2003-01-12 09:14pm

Vista Gaming Performance

Post by Arrow »

Several sites now have articles up going into Vista's game performance:

Gamespot

PC Perspective

Firing Squad AMD Only

Firing Squad Aero in Background

Doesn't look at all like the doom and gloom I've seen tossed around, and in some tests, Vista is faster than XP. Once the drivers are in a more complete state, there shouldn't be much performance difference Vista and XP.
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

The tomshardware benchmarks do show a performance hit though (and a rather severe hit running OpenGL apps). Might be just specific to their test setup though (since they only tested one set of hardware).

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/

And isn't the hardcore gamer type also the type to go through huge effort overclocking to get a slight performance increase? This kind of negates the standard slight overclock.

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
User avatar
Arrow
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: 2003-01-12 09:14pm

Post by Arrow »

Tom's game benchmarks appear to be in line with other sites (CoD2, Fear, etc.). OpenGL is purely dependent on the GPU vendors now (almost like it was on XP), so AMD and Nvidia need to come up big here; for the moment, I'm going to blame the drivers for the poor performance.

The CPU benchmarks are interesting. Some run well, others look like shit. It looks more like a program issue or compatibility settings issue than anything, since some programs run well.
User avatar
Xon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6206
Joined: 2002-07-16 06:12am
Location: Western Australia

Post by Xon »

Considering how immature drivers are for Vista, I dont find this suprising at all. Drivers make or break modern gaming preformance.
"Okay, I'll have the truth with a side order of clarity." ~ Dr. Daniel Jackson.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Xon wrote:Considering how immature drivers are for Vista, I dont find this suprising at all. Drivers make or break modern gaming preformance.
WDDM is certainly different from the old WDM architecture! I'd bet that most companies are trying for correctness first, performance later.
User avatar
Count Dooku
Jedi Knight
Posts: 577
Joined: 2006-01-18 11:37pm
Location: California

Post by Count Dooku »

So, as I understand this, there won't be any significant jump in what you see unless you have a DX10 card, Vista and a game made for DX10? I'll probably wait a good year to upgrade (unless I'm actually able to pick up a copy from the bookstore. Student discounts are a life saver).
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." (Seneca the Younger, 5 BC - 65 AD)
Post Reply