StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Is there a hosting site that isn't going to mass delete 10 drawings at a time because they have boobs in them, but NOT delete pictures of ACTUAL boobs?

P.S. I can understand them deleting Hulk Rape.

P.P.S. Is there a way I can host from my own computer? Or would I have to get a server or my own web page for that?

Imageshack? DeviantArt? They have those oh so horrible boobies on. I'll have to question their containing any Hulk rape though.

Admiral Valdemar wrote:Imageshack? DeviantArt? They have those oh so horrible boobies on. I'll have to question their containing any Hulk rape though.

Deviantart would work, but not everyone has an account there, and I do tag mature content, and you can't view it without signing up. Imageshack is a pain in the ass, or it was last time I used it.

Most of the doujin scanners at a site I frequent use Picamatic for hosting sample pages. It's kind of like imageshack, though, in that you hotlink to a thumbnail that the viewer clicks to open the full image.

If you have a Google Pages account or however they're calling it these days, you can upload your images to it and hotlink from there. It's not suitable for very high traffic, but for a few dozen images it works fine and there's no active censorship as far as I know.

Why not use Flickr? You can mark the content as innapropiate, and the basic account is free and lets you upload 100MB a month.

Hulk rape?

Kaiser Caesar wrote:Hulk rape?

Trust me you don't wanna know.

Fuck, is Hulk Rape gone? That was like Havok's manifesto! A testament to the qualities and virtues he held dear!

Dammit. I knew I should have saved it locally when I saw it.

Don't put "boobs," "tits," "knockers," "adult," or "NSFW" in your image tags and you should be OK. The filters look at text, not images.

Count Chocula wrote:Don't put "boobs," "tits," "knockers," "adult," or "NSFW" in your image tags and you should be OK. The filters look at text, not images.

AH! Useful information! Thanks. That would also explain why the pictures I have of girls flashing in a booth with me haven't gotten nailed.

Old Plympto wrote:Dammit. I knew I should have saved it locally when I saw it.

Don't worry buddy! I will save Christmas YET!

havokeff wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:Don't put "boobs," "tits," "knockers," "adult," or "NSFW" in your image tags and you should be OK. The filters look at text, not images.

AH! Useful information! Thanks. That would also explain why the pictures I have of girls flashing in a booth with me haven't gotten nailed.

Well wait. Looking at the titles only one or two have any words that would be considered bad... "sluttly", "naked" and "satan", which I would think would be pushing it. So that is two out of thirteen that would qualify in the filter search. I wonder if some prude just went through tagging them?

Any answer on my last question anyone?

havokeff wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:Don't put "boobs," "tits," "knockers," "adult," or "NSFW" in your image tags and you should be OK. The filters look at text, not images.

AH! Useful information! Thanks. That would also explain why the pictures I have of girls flashing in a booth with me haven't gotten nailed.

Wait, you have a pic of girls (plural) flashing, and you're there, and the rest of us haven't seen this? How could you deprive us of that?

Braedley wrote:

havokeff wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:Don't put "boobs," "tits," "knockers," "adult," or "NSFW" in your image tags and you should be OK. The filters look at text, not images.

AH! Useful information! Thanks. That would also explain why the pictures I have of girls flashing in a booth with me haven't gotten nailed.

Wait, you have a pic of girls (plural) flashing, and you're there, and the rest of us haven't seen this? How could you deprive us of that?

Second that request for a PM.

You guys are fucking sad.

Hav, it's possible someone reported the images. Most of these places don't follow up reports like that, they just insta-kill the file.

Stark wrote:You guys are fucking sad.

Hav, it's possible someone reported the images. Most of these places don't follow up reports like that, they just insta-kill the file.

Are you saying someone snitched on Havok for Hulk Rape?

Fucking rats.

When Hav finds out who did it, HULK SMASH!

Did a little digging on Photobucket's terms of use:

8. Content/Activity Prohibited.
8.3 exploits people in a sexual or violent manner;

8.4 contains nudity, excessive violence, or offensive subject matter or contains a link to an adult website;

As someone else noted, you were likely reported and unfortunately they're within terms of use to remove images. Dammit.

Don't people read OPs anymore? I'm not bitching about them removing items that fall under the terms of service, just the arbitrary nature of it, and that they didn't remove ALL the pictures that fall under Photobuckets TOS. And was asking if there were sites that didn't have this particular TOS rule.