AvP2 refused classification in Australia
Posted: 2009-12-03 09:49pm
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=139102
This is a new AvP game, they just haven't given it a number, like they didn't with the first PC one.PeZook wrote:Isn't that shooter, like, really old?
Or is it another case of people reusing old names for some unfathomable reason, like with the new Medal Of Honor?
Bureaucratic inertia being Attorney-General Michael Atkinson in this case. Only one person needs to veto the addition of a new rating category. That person is Michael Atkinson. Every fucking time. (In my limited understanding of the whole matter)/Vendetta wrote:So, presumably its just bureaucratic inertia that prevents an 18 rated certificate being added ?
If I recall correctly, there's a pretty hefty fine involved in the selling of an unclassified game, much as there is a hefty fine for importing one. There's no penalty for possessing one, as I recall, though.What's the penalty for selling unclassified video games anyway?
I guess the fact that one person can stop the process is a symptom of the need for restructuring or revision of the system.Ford Prefect wrote:While it's funny to blame it on Atkinson, and it's broadly accurate, this doesn't really address theo ther problems that exist with the OFLC, like it's complete lack of internal consistency.
This new game is really more like Alien vs. Predator 3... having said that though, there are some fans who refuse to acknowledge the existence of the second game (can't see why, myself, I really enjoyed it at the time).PeZook wrote:Isn't that shooter, like, really old?
Or is it another case of people reusing old names for some unfathomable reason, like with the new Medal Of Honor?
PeZook wrote:The second game was way, way better than the first one, IMHO. An actual plot? Levels that are more than straight corridors? Ability to save the game?
Oh noes! The franchise is ruined!
Levels were even more linear corridors in the second AVP. And the plot was not good enough to make up for how much the gameplay sucked in comparison. Take the predators cloak charge for example. Every few seconds you have to a lame repetitive animation where you pull out a charging devices and press shiny buttons. It was cool the first two or three times. But having to repeat it every time you have to fight got extremely irritating. AVP 1s auto charging power source was much more intuitive.PeZook wrote:The second game was way, way better than the first one, IMHO. An actual plot? Levels that are more than straight corridors? Ability to save the game?
Oh noes! The franchise is ruined!
Huh? You may not like the art or animations, but all these elements were even crappier in the first game. And I have to wonder: how does a genuine game set in the Aliens universe feel like?Commander 598 wrote: Hooray, a completely generic and poorly scripted experience with an art team that watches too much anime and and an animation team that wouldn't even be accepted on a mod team! It's like I'm not even playing a game set in the Aliens universe! Best AvP game! 10/10!
They were pretty linear, but it also had open spaces and sometimes you could even take an alternate routeSarevok wrote: Levels were even more linear corridors in the second AVP.
It was a rather generic Aliens plot, with stupid humans getting themselves murdered en masse due to their own massive dumbassness, but at least you had a sense of a goal, rather than AvP1's "move forward through random disjointed levels". For me at least, the first game felt like an acid trip.Sarevok wrote:And the plot was not good enough to make up for how much the gameplay sucked in comparison.
Yeah, the "charging device" was a horrible, horrible design choice. So were most other stuff, like hacking equipment, which was pretty much a nicely dressed button to press, and thus completely unnecessary.Sarevok wrote:Take the predators cloak charge for example. Every few seconds you have to a lame repetitive animation where you pull out a charging devices and press shiny buttons. It was cool the first two or three times. But having to repeat it every time you have to fight got extremely irritating. AVP 1s auto charging power source was much more intuitive.
The outdoor sequences did convey the feeling of a barren desolate alien world. I played as predator first and the crappy graphics and weird alien landscape felt surreal and yet believable especially as I cycled through vision modes. I would have loved more levels like the first two. Its the claustrophobic indoor levels when AVP 2 is at it's worst.They were pretty linear, but it also had open spaces and sometimes you could even take an alternate route
Personally both games felt like that for me. I primarily used the predator and I think it contributed towards the "pretend you are an extraterrestial hunter" experience.It was a rather generic Aliens plot, with stupid humans getting themselves murdered en masse due to their own massive dumbassness, but at least you had a sense of a goal, rather than AvP1's "move forward through random disjointed levels". For me at least, the first game felt like an acid trip.
In my opinion biggest problem with AVP 1 was poor level design. They could have done a lot more with the three races and unique arsenal of weapons. Yet the game was just designed to be a difficult shooting gallery instead of exploring, stalking, combating etc experience.My jab was directed more at the fanboys who thought AvP1 was the best Aliens game ever despite its massive, glaring flaws. Did you know not being able to save is an integral part of the Aliens experience?
The animations in 2 were AWFUL. Everything looks so robotic in movement, and the worst part is: IT'S OBVIOUS. The art style was only an issue until someone modded in vastly better skins which made it not only look less like a cartoon but GASP, like AvP1. It literally changed the whole mood of the game.PeZook wrote:Huh? You may not like the art or animations, but all these elements were even crappier in the first game.Commander 598 wrote: Hooray, a completely generic and poorly scripted experience with an art team that watches too much anime and and an animation team that wouldn't even be accepted on a mod team! It's like I'm not even playing a game set in the Aliens universe! Best AvP game! 10/10!
Drab, grungy, strobe lights, and PITCH darkness illuminated only by a very bright light at the far end of the hallway? Like the movies basically.And I have to wonder: how does a genuine game set in the Aliens universe feel like?
Yeah, it was overpowered. You could dismember a whole group of humans in an instant. Of course, you were also insanely fragile as well, dashing around a corner fight in front of a sentry gun or Marine with a smart gun was a quick death and the former was a bit frightening if you weren't expecting it and your speakers were turned up.Of course, the Alien was absurdly overpowered in AvP2 (it might have been in the first game as well, I can't really remember)
In a statement released this morning by Rebellion's Jason Kingsley, concerning the Australian Classification Board's so-called "ban" of Rebellion's Aliens vs. Predator game, the CEO expressed his studio's disappointment with the board's ruling, but added, "as we understand the law in that country the authorities had no choice as we agree strongly that our game is not suitable for game players who are not adults."
The subtle swipe at the Australian ratings system, which tops out at an MA15+ classification, turned into a full-on blow as Kingsley concluded, "We will not be releasing a sanitized or cut down version for territories where adults are not considered by their governments to be able to make their own entertainment choices."
Because the Attorney General of one state doesn't like adult content. It's not actually a personal thing against video games though: he says that if he had his way, there'd be no R18+ rating for movies either, so at least it is somewhat consistent. He is also highly unpopular with everyone except the Premier, who's the only one with the authority to remove him. Unfortunately, the Premier is very popular and is a former publicity dude, so he knows how to milk the media, and the opposition party is a bunch of morons who couldn't find their arse if it was on fire.LordOskuro wrote:I still don't get what's the excuse to not have an Adults Only classification in Australia.
I also don't get the fines. Aren't ratings kind of an aid to customers in the rest of the world? How come down there they have legal status?