Woah, and here I was treating my old NES games with care back in the day!

Also, what's with these cute-voiced game reviewers? I mean, this Rinry girl, Little Miss Gamer, Angry Joe...
Moderator: Thanas
I had two NES's, and both of them broke within five years of getting them (we got the second one to replace the first one when it broke).I recall that the snes console never had a problem but the nes console itself wouldoften break down. I don't know if my experience is unique though.
Modern electronics appear to be far more fragile and more easily breakable than older ones. Pre-electronic technologies are better at surviving since they have less fragile components. The monuments most likely to survive into the far future are the ones that have survived into the present, i.e. stone, metalwork etc. They might find city ruins but unless something is preserved very well I doubt they'll find any electronics.LordOskuro wrote:I think the Game Boy I got for my bday like 18 years ago is still floating around my parents' house, with its original tetris cartridge being the main attraction.
Will aliens from the far future deduce we never got past 16 bit gaming when all their digsites can uncover are NES and SNES consoles?
Shame the N64 controller was designed by an idiot and would fail if you played too much of the only good games on N64.Darksider wrote:My N64 is practically as good a new, but my SNES has some problems. It will work for a while, but any vibration or movement will cause it to reset.
Not sure if it's true, but I heard that they designed it that form because they weren't sure if the analogue stick would be popular, so they had the extra hand position as redundancy, you get a SNES controller if you hold it with the left and right halves, then the Analogue if you hold middle and right.Shame the N64 controller was designed by an idiot and would fail if you played too much of the only good games on N64.
Isn't that the point though? More sophisticated components = more dense chips, higher frequency clocks, higher runing temperature, more moving parts. Obviously the 360 was a pile of turd, but the lifespan of well designed video-game systems is unlikely to exceed 50 years, unless you've got it locked up in a vault and are treating it like an antique (A treatment I'm sure at least a couple will get). I'd expect PSWii60's to last less than, say, the SNES will, even leaving aside design issues like RROD.PS moving parts = less reliable than no moving parts, high temperature = less reliable than low temperature, let's not make some ridiculous statements here. Remember, 360 has design flaw = advanced technology is fragile.
If you had more datapoints to give me, I'd be happy to factor them in. Comparative console failure rates over generations would be ideal, but I'm 99% sure such things don't exist.Stark wrote:So your conclusion is based on a single datapoint around an engineering failure? The biggest issue in common with modern consoles is firmware bricking, not 'MS designed a crap box therefore modern tech is vulnerable'.
I'm not interested in whether they're designed shittily or not, I'm interested in whether denser circuitry and memory, beefier power supplies and higher clock speeds results in lower mean time to failure. I didn't base this on the 360 RRODing at all. I'd be stupid to, since we also have PC's, the PS3 and (arguably) the Wii to gauge this generation by.So if the NES was designed with a box-killing flaw you'd be baselessly claiming new tech is more stable?
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
The push down nes would break due to the pins getting bent. They can be refurbished so as to not do this though.ArmorPierce wrote:I recall that the snes console never had a problem but the nes console itself wouldoften break down. I don't know if my experience is unique though.